Do you think humans will ever visit a planet outside of our solar system?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Celldrax
Celldrax

15053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Celldrax
Member since 2005 • 15053 Posts

Once we find the Mass relays. 

CHOASXIII

Avatar image for Primordialous
Primordialous

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 Primordialous
Member since 2012 • 1313 Posts

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

No, we were created to stay on Earth.

gamerguru100

lol

Avatar image for Angie7F
Angie7F

1175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Angie7F
Member since 2011 • 1175 Posts

Maybe, but do we need to? 

Avatar image for Celldrax
Celldrax

15053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Celldrax
Member since 2005 • 15053 Posts

Maybe, but do we need to? 

Angie7F

The sun will eventually swallow up the earth.

So yeah.....in the event that humans end up surviving that long, we'll need to find some other system to migrate to.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Wolfetan"] He's very religious too. Anyways, we will make it to another galaxy sometime. Its impossible we won't.. Humans have more than a billion years on this planet. Why WOULDN'T we expand? At the rate technology is going, couldn't see it not happening.Wolfetan
I don't think so. Going to Mars is a huge step. Going to a star is not an equally huge step. It's a huge x100 step. And to stars on the other side of the galaxy is x1000 that step and to another galaxy (except for some dwarf galaxies orbiting the milky way) is that step x10000.

Think, in a BILLION years..

Do you realize just how long a billion years is? What makes you think humanity will be around then?

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="gamerguru100"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

No, we were created to stay on Earth.

GrayF0X786

lol

yes it is funny that you are deluded and ignorant, why don't you jump, defy gravity, land on Pluto or something like that and get back to me :) no? instead you breath the in the air around you, benefit from the Sun, use your eyes to see, your ears to hear and etc, you are a fking creation, get that into your head and don't beleive the lies of materials around you,

i could understand how some find it fascinating to leave the Earth some day, maybe that is because you have read too many novels, watched too many films or played too much Mass Effect, that your brain cannot accept the reality that you are on Earth and you have been preset with limitations.

but then again you can keep trying to reach the stars in a civilised sensible manner, and no i am not talking about strapping 0.0000001% of the population of the Earth to a multi billion dollar rocket to land on the moon in an uncomfortable suit only to shove a flag on the ground and tell the world anything is possible.

 

too late

 

moon-exploration_1098_600x450.jpg

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

[QUOTE="gamerguru100"] lolwis3boi

yes it is funny that you are deluded and ignorant, why don't you jump, defy gravity, land on Pluto or something like that and get back to me :) no? instead you breath the in the air around you, benefit from the Sun, use your eyes to see, your ears to hear and etc, you are a fking creation, get that into your head and don't beleive the lies of materials around you,

i could understand how some find it fascinating to leave the Earth some day, maybe that is because you have read too many novels, watched too many films or played too much Mass Effect, that your brain cannot accept the reality that you are on Earth and you have been preset with limitations.

but then again you can keep trying to reach the stars in a civilised sensible manner, and no i am not talking about strapping 0.0000001% of the population of the Earth to a multi billion dollar rocket to land on the moon in an uncomfortable suit only to shove a flag on the ground and tell the world anything is possible.

too late

moon-exploration_1098_600x450.jpg

:lol: did you read my post Sheikh Wisboi?

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"] yes it is funny that you are deluded and ignorant, why don't you jump, defy gravity, land on Pluto or something like that and get back to me :) no? instead you breath the in the air around you, benefit from the Sun, use your eyes to see, your ears to hear and etc, you are a fking creation, get that into your head and don't beleive the lies of materials around you,

i could understand how some find it fascinating to leave the Earth some day, maybe that is because you have read too many novels, watched too many films or played too much Mass Effect, that your brain cannot accept the reality that you are on Earth and you have been preset with limitations.

but then again you can keep trying to reach the stars in a civilised sensible manner, and no i am not talking about strapping 0.0000001% of the population of the Earth to a multi billion dollar rocket to land on the moon in an uncomfortable suit only to shove a flag on the ground and tell the world anything is possible.

GrayF0X786

 

too late

 

 

:lol: did you read my post Sheikh Wisboi?

 

Yes, it doesn't make you any less of a fool.

Avatar image for AFBrat77
AFBrat77

26848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 AFBrat77
Member since 2004 • 26848 Posts

Eventually yes but not in our lifetimesJML897

this

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38699 Posts
Eventually yes but not in our lifetimesJML897
/thread
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#61 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts

No, personally I think the human race will cease to exist long before this ever comes close to happening.

Vari3ty
This. And even if we should manage to make that jump, only the rich and successful will ever get the benefit of visiting/migrating to said planet....
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

Yes, I think at some point we would as we really wouldn't have a choice if the human race wants to live on. The earth is not going to be around forever, although humans do have a long time to come up with something for travel and to find a suitable place to live.

It does not seem likely that we will find another means of travel besides via a space craft that can sustain life for an extended period of time where generations of humans can live and prosper until the destination is reached. Who knows maybe someone finds a way to get to a worm hole and we can travel through it, but as of right now we are stuck here.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

No, personally I think the human race will cease to exist long before this ever comes close to happening.

tocool340

This. And even if we should manage to make that jump, only the rich and successful will ever get the benefit of visiting/migrating to said planet....

Andd lets be realistic here, do you really see any other way? If the population of earth continues to grow how in gods green earth are we supposed to transport 6 + billion people. It is just not feasible, unless there is a worm hole on planet earth.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#65 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts

No. We'll die before technology gets to that level. Fightingfan
Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

Maybe convert an artficial sun into a means to travel to a different universe...

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]No. We'll die before technology gets to that level. tocool340
Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

Well you're an idiot then
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]No. We'll die before technology gets to that level. tocool340
Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#68 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts
[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]No. We'll die before technology gets to that level. themajormayor
Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

Well you're an idiot then

How so?...
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="tocool340"] Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...tocool340
Well you're an idiot then

How so?...

 

- you can't make a star

- you have 5 billion years before ours dies, humans will not be around at that point, we'll be dead or have long since evolved into countless other animal types

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Well you're an idiot thenwis3boi

How so?...

we'll be dead or have long since evolved into countless other animal types

the fvck?!?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="tocool340"] Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

Well you're an idiot then

How so?...

Considering the sun makes up >99% of the mass of the solar system. The material needed for a sun pretty much requires us to mooch off of other planets. Many other planets.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="tocool340"] How so?...GrayF0X786

we'll be dead or have long since evolved into countless other animal types

I'm a moron!!!

we know
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#73 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]No. We'll die before technology gets to that level. wis3boi

Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

Of course we can't duplicate the sun in size and mass. But I'm talking about creating something that can replicate its solar power. It could be a massive structure that can work as an enclosure for the Earth or a giant light bulb that orbits the earth for all I care. But I think time should be spent trying to figure out a way to preserve this planet rather than attempting to migrate to another before the suns time is up...
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="tocool340"] Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...tocool340

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

Of course we can't duplicate the sun in size and mass. But I'm talking about creating something that can replicate its solar power. It could be a massive structure that can work as an enclosure for the Earth or a giant light bulb that orbits the earth for all I care. But I think time should be spent trying to figure out a way to preserve this planet rather than attempting to migrate to another before the suns time is up...

You mean like fusion? That's already happening pretty much
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

Hm. I think humanity would benefit more from trying to create an artificial sun than trying to find another planet that we can mooch off of...tocool340

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

Of course we can't duplicate the sun in size and mass. But I'm talking about creating something that can replicate its solar power. It could be a massive structure that can work as an enclosure for the Earth or a giant light bulb that orbits the earth for all I care. But I think time should be spent trying to figure out a way to preserve this planet rather than attempting to migrate to another before the suns time is up...

Listen even if you wanted to try to preserve this planet, which is a nice thought, it is impossible. The sun also holds us in the solar system, so you would need something the mass of the star to put in its place to keep us in the goldilocks zone. My feeling is the human race has a better chance of finding a habitable planet than finding a way to preserve the planet. It will eventually die off.
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#76 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts
[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

themajormayor
Of course we can't duplicate the sun in size and mass. But I'm talking about creating something that can replicate its solar power. It could be a massive structure that can work as an enclosure for the Earth or a giant light bulb that orbits the earth for all I care. But I think time should be spent trying to figure out a way to preserve this planet rather than attempting to migrate to another before the suns time is up...

You mean like fusion? That's already happening pretty much

Fusion is one solution I'm talking about, though creating something big enough to act as a miniature sun for our planet will be extremely difficult and would consider it a last ditch effort. But it don't have to be limited to just fusion. We got a billion years to figure out multiple way to get this planet to survive without the need of a sun. I honestly think that's more realistic than migrating to a different planet via a ship...
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#77 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts
[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

We can't/won't build a sun....but we can make a dyson sphere, possibly.

Of course we can't duplicate the sun in size and mass. But I'm talking about creating something that can replicate its solar power. It could be a massive structure that can work as an enclosure for the Earth or a giant light bulb that orbits the earth for all I care. But I think time should be spent trying to figure out a way to preserve this planet rather than attempting to migrate to another before the suns time is up...

Listen even if you wanted to try to preserve this planet, which is a nice thought, it is impossible. The sun also holds us in the solar system, so you would need something the mass of the star to put in its place to keep us in the goldilocks zone. My feeling is the human race has a better chance of finding a habitable planet than finding a way to preserve the planet. It will eventually die off.

I think we could probably see a habitable planet through a telescope. As far as getting there, I highly doubt it. It will take perhaps thousands of generations to get there and I doubt humans will be able to co-operate long enough in an enclosed environment to get there in one piece. Not to mention resources and population would probably become a problem...
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Well you're an idiot thenwis3boi

How so?...

 

- you can't make a star

Sure we can. We'll just make a huge cotton ball, send it into space, soak it in butane and light it on fire.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

nunovlopes

And 500 years ago people thought the Sun revolved around the Earth. We have a bit better understanding of physics now (including its limitations). Impossible? Perhaps not. Unlikely? Extremely. Sure it's cool to dream about travelling to other solar systems (or even other galaxies), but to deny the realities of the obstacles in our path is just silly.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="tocool340"] How so?...worlock77

 

- you can't make a star

Sure we can. We'll just make a huge cotton ball, send it into space, soak it in butane and light it on fire.

Genius!

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

 

- you can't make a starwis3boi

Sure we can. We'll just make a huge cotton ball, send it into space, soak it in butane and light it on fire.

Genius!

I have my moments.

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

Well Project Orion in the 1960s theorized nuclear bomb powered space craft that would need between 100 and 1000 years to reach Alpha Centauri, ofcourse all of this was theoretical, but it had alot of weight behind it, it wasn't just blabbering by some lunatic. So generally if something along the lines of the Project Orion craft was built today, it could reach Alpha Centauri in about 2 human life times.

But why would you do this? To reach Alpha Centauri the ship would have to be massive, the Super Orion craft proposed would have a mass of 8 million tonnes with 1080 3000 tonne nuclear bombs. This would allow the craft to house the necessary supplies and also give the voyagers enough comfort.

Also the first crew, who would probably be along the lines of 20-30 years old would spend their entire life aboard the vessel, would have to raise families, and some 2 or 3 generations would never even set foot on solid ground, while another 2 or 3 would be incredibly old by the time Alpha Centauri is reached. And once Alpha Centauri is reached, what will you do there? There is a slight chance that one planet is actually Earth-like, but again, slight chance. If there is nothing there a gigantic ammount of resources will be wasted and thousands of people will die in vain practically.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Someday, perhaps.
Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

worlock77

And 500 years ago people thought the Sun revolved around the Earth. We have a bit better understanding of physics now (including its limitations). Impossible? Perhaps not. Unlikely? Extremely. Sure it's cool to dream about travelling to other solar systems (or even other galaxies), but to deny the realities of the obstacles in our path is just silly.

No we don't. Not at a really large scale at least. I mean sure we know much more now about how the world works but in the grand scheme of things we know nothing. I'm not denying anything, I just think people think too much inside the box.

Avatar image for Yusuke420
Yusuke420

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#86 Yusuke420
Member since 2012 • 2770 Posts

A small version of the sun could give us the limitless power we seek. How has the work on building self sustaining fusion been going? I mean they have to use that giant particle smasher for something right?

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

A small version of the sun could give us the limitless power we seek. How has the work on building self sustaining fusion been going? I mean they have to use that giant particle smasher for something right?

Yusuke420
I think Nuclear is the best option at the moment, but no one wants to end up like Chernobyl.
Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

nunovlopes

It's a lot easier to say this in retrospect since we have a much better understanding of what it takes to accomplish getting to the moon. People back then would understandably be skeptical because they lacked what we now know about aerodynamics, astrophysics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and many other relevant fields of science that made the moon landing possible.

So it's silly to point out how people back then wouldn't have been able to imagine what we've accomplished today, because they hadn't made the key discoveries that made something like the moon landing feasible. It's also just as dumb to say that we're thinking too much inside the box since we're approaching the question of extrasolar colonization in terms of our current capabilities. We can't assume that we'll eventually make some discovery that completely changes how we go about solving our current problems just because it's happened before. We have to be aware of and work around our current limitations first since we have no real way of predicting what sort of future discoveries will be made and how they will impact things like colonization.

This is why it's stupid to sit back and tell ourselves that we'll just find some way to get around our current obstacles without having any sort of concrete understanding of how it'd be done, because that ignores the question of whether or not it's even plausible. Take the 'food printing' machine, for instance: What would be the mechanism behind the arrangement of the organic molecules that make up the food? How would we go about making 'blue prints' for food? How efficient would the process be? How safe would it be for consumptipn?

Saying that 'everything is possible' and that we're not thinking outside of the box is just intellectually lazy and ignores the problems that lie ahead of us.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I have a few thoughts on it.

First of all, it'll be several hundred years before we could conjure up the resources (not to mention energy - DEAR FVCKING JESUS CHRIST -- the thing would be MASSIVE AND REQUIRE SEEMINGLY INFINITE AMOUNTS OF ENERGY) to send a multi-generational vessel travelling under the speed of light (because that is probably the way things are going to go down) to a solar system with other (habitable) planets. It'll be a weird social experiment, too (though it could be tested beforehand, but that'd be weird). Even then there are problems with things like space dust, could easily wreck the entire endeavor (heard a proposed solution, not sure how practical it is, however).

My thoughts are a big: maybe, but, like planet terraforming, it's so far off in the future that commenting on when or how would be silly.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

Blood-Scribe

It's a lot easier to say this in retrospect since we have a much better understanding of what it takes to accomplish getting to the moon. People back then would understandably be skeptical because they lacked what we now know about aerodynamics, astrophysics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and many other relevant fields of science that made the moon landing possible.

So it's silly to point out how people back then wouldn't have been able to imagine what we've accomplished today, because they hadn't made the key discoveries that made something like the moon landing feasible. It's also just as dumb to say that we're thinking too much inside the box since we're approaching the question of extrasolar colonization in terms of our current capabilities. We can't assume that we'll eventually make some discovery that completely changes how we go about solving our current problems just because it's happened before. We have to be aware of and work around our current limitations first since we have no real way of predicting what sort of future discoveries will be made and how they will impact things like colonization.

This is why it's stupid to sit back and tell ourselves that we'll just find some way to get around our current obstacles without having any sort of concrete understanding of how it'd be done, because that ignores the question of whether or not it's even plausible. Take the 'food printing' machine, for instance: What would be the mechanism behind the arrangement of the organic molecules that make up the food? How would we go about making 'blue prints' for food? How efficient would the process be? How safe would it be for consumptipn?

Saying that 'everything is possible' and that we're not thinking outside of the box is just intellectually lazy and ignores the problems that lie ahead of us.

You

are

my

hero

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

No, we were created to stay on Earth.

GrayF0X786

pretty big talk from someone whose basic components most likely came from space.

RAW ingredients carried to Earth by meteorites may have been the seed of life on our planet, according to evidence revealed yesterday by NASA.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/life-came-from-outer-space-says-nasa/story-e6frg6so-1225991941243

Avatar image for Kats_RK
Kats_RK

2080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 Kats_RK
Member since 2010 • 2080 Posts

Maybe one day but we won't be alive to see it :(

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

You guys are thinking too much inside the box.

Imagine you told someone 500 years ago that one day we'd be able to land on the moon. Ok first you'd be burned for heresy, but getting past that I'm sure even the most prominent scientific minds would argue that the amount of energy we'd need to take off is impossible, cannot be done, and so on. Along with other impossible things they just couldn't wrap their mind around.

And you're talking about resources, lack of funds... It's absurd to think the current system (capitalism) will exist forever, maybe we move on to something else. And resources such as food, etc.? Maybe we come up with food "printers", machines that can create organic stuff from its chemical components.

Outright saying we'll all be dead is also absurd. Maybe but who knows.

Everything is possible.

Blood-Scribe

It's a lot easier to say this in retrospect since we have a much better understanding of what it takes to accomplish getting to the moon. People back then would understandably be skeptical because they lacked what we now know about aerodynamics, astrophysics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and many other relevant fields of science that made the moon landing possible.

So it's silly to point out how people back then wouldn't have been able to imagine what we've accomplished today, because they hadn't made the key discoveries that made something like the moon landing feasible. It's also just as dumb to say that we're thinking too much inside the box since we're approaching the question of extrasolar colonization in terms of our current capabilities. We can't assume that we'll eventually make some discovery that completely changes how we go about solving our current problems just because it's happened before. We have to be aware of and work around our current limitations first since we have no real way of predicting what sort of future discoveries will be made and how they will impact things like colonization.

This is why it's stupid to sit back and tell ourselves that we'll just find some way to get around our current obstacles without having any sort of concrete understanding of how it'd be done, because that ignores the question of whether or not it's even plausible. Take the 'food printing' machine, for instance: What would be the mechanism behind the arrangement of the organic molecules that make up the food? How would we go about making 'blue prints' for food? How efficient would the process be? How safe would it be for consumptipn?

Saying that 'everything is possible' and that we're not thinking outside of the box is just intellectually lazy and ignores the problems that lie ahead of us.

This is a much, much better version of what I was more or less trying to say.

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#94 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

No, we were created to stay on Earth.

Riverwolf007

pretty big talk from someone whose basic components most likely came from space.

RAW ingredients carried to Earth by meteorites may have been the seed of life on our planet, according to evidence revealed yesterday by NASA.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/life-came-from-outer-space-says-nasa/story-e6frg6so-1225991941243

*Yawn* Muslims already knew this 1400 years ago, keep up :)

Qu'ran 57:25

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

The faster something goes, the more thrust is required to propel it faster, and it's exponential.  It's too much energy.  We won't be able to go as fast as light, but wormholes are probably more likely form of travel

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

The faster something goes, the more thrust is required to propel it faster, and it's exponential.  It's too much energy.  We won't be able to go as fast as light, but wormholes are probably more likely form of travel

GOGOGOGURT

You don't need lightspeed to leave the system

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

The faster something goes, the more thrust is required to propel it faster, and it's exponential.  It's too much energy.  We won't be able to go as fast as light, but wormholes are probably more likely form of travel

wis3boi

You don't need lightspeed to leave the system

He didn't say that it did.

Avatar image for Walternatif
Walternatif

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Walternatif
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Probably yes,but I doubt that it will be soon..
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

No, we were created to stay on Earth.

GrayF0X786

pretty big talk from someone whose basic components most likely came from space.

RAW ingredients carried to Earth by meteorites may have been the seed of life on our planet, according to evidence revealed yesterday by NASA.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/life-came-from-outer-space-says-nasa/story-e6frg6so-1225991941243

*Yawn* Muslims already knew this 1400 years ago, keep up :)

Qu'ran 57:25

Apparently not since that doesn't mention anything about the subject of that article.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

The faster something goes, the more thrust is required to propel it faster, and it's exponential.  It's too much energy.  We won't be able to go as fast as light, but wormholes are probably more likely form of travel

wis3boi

You don't need lightspeed to leave the system

 

You're right.  And besides, even if we could travel lightspeed, we would still be pretty slow.  Way too slow.