or the lack there of...
one of these screen shots is the Wii, and the other 2 are from the dreamcast and xbox 1.
i mean im not asking for a PS3 graphics whore but come on? couldnt we have atleast got 720p support?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
couldnt we have atleast got 720psupport?chargr67
No, because the Wii only supports up to 480p. :?
And the graphics in this game were intentional, as others have already said. The House of the Dead games retain their original graphics for nostalgia. And for much lower development costs.
If you're going to complain about the Wii's graphics, at least choose games where the developers were actually trying to be impressive.
Why would you only look at the worst looking Wii game (Or close to it)?
I suggest you stop being a graphics whore. I have a 360 but I still have no problem with Wii's graphics, or SNES graphics for that matter.
[QUOTE="chargr67"]couldnt we have atleast got 720psupport?JordanElek
No, because the Wii only supports up to 480p. :?
And the graphics in this game were intentional, as others have already said. The House of the Dead games retain their original graphics for nostalgia. And for much lower development costs.
If you're going to complain about the Wii's graphics, at least choose games where the developers were actually trying to be impressive.
Yeah, look at Super Mario Galaxy. It's absolutely a gem.
Sorry people, but I'm gonna have to defend this guy on this. Not for the proposed 720p support because that's not necessary. After seeing Metroid Prime, Mario Galaxy, and Resident Evil 4, we know that the wii is capable of quality graphics. PS2 titles shouldn't be on par with quality Wii titles. What is shown is a comparison of a game that's running on a dreamcast console that's about 10 years old, an xbox console that's 8 years old, and a nintendo wii that's 2 years old. There should be no comparison in quality. And with 480p, the graphics in motion should be much more impressive. I'm not blaming it on the wii, I'm blaming devs for S-L-A-C-K-I-N-G big time. This has got to stop.supreuphFirst off I dont think you are really defending the TC because it seems like he is blaming the Wii...second jaysonguy made a pretty good thread the other day where he was very clear about the harmfulness of wiimakes but not of ports on the wii... this was just a port that sega did, it didnt take up to much time and as we can see from sega's line up it really didnt hurt the other games that sega is putting out. Its just a quick low cost port and if you want to buy it you can but you dont have too... I would have been much more upset with this game if they made it look great because that would have pulled a lot more resoures from sega that they are useing for other things. wiimakes are slowing down progress too much but ports while not helping progress are not slowing it down nearly as much.
[QUOTE="supreuph"]Sorry people, but I'm gonna have to defend this guy on this. Not for the proposed 720p support because that's not necessary. After seeing Metroid Prime, Mario Galaxy, and Resident Evil 4, we know that the wii is capable of quality graphics. PS2 titles shouldn't be on par with quality Wii titles. What is shown is a comparison of a game that's running on a dreamcast console that's about 10 years old, an xbox console that's 8 years old, and a nintendo wii that's 2 years old. There should be no comparison in quality. And with 480p, the graphics in motion should be much more impressive. I'm not blaming it on the wii, I'm blaming devs for S-L-A-C-K-I-N-G big time. This has got to stop.ag1052First off I dont think you are really defending the TC because it seems like he is blaming the Wii...second jaysonguy made a pretty good thread the other day where he was very clear about the harmfulness of wiimakes but not of ports on the wii... this was just a port that sega did, it didnt take up to much time and as we can see from sega's line up it really didnt hurt the other games that sega is putting out. Its just a quick low cost port and if you want to buy it you can but you dont have too... I would have been much more upset with this game if they made it look great because that would have pulled a lot more resoures from sega that they are useing for other things. wiimakes are slowing down progress too much but ports while not helping progress are not slowing it down nearly as much.
Yes. Ports need to stop. We need to boycott ports. Can we do that? Who's with me on this!?!? I guess it is important to differentiate between ports and "wiimakes". I like that...wiimakes. These devs need to wiimake these half-assed ports.
Lol so true , some n64 graphics had better quality graphics , cough * banjo tooie* , Developers need to put some more effort into there games , half the crap on the wii is from developers , trying to cash in on nintendo's sucess, until i see good games from 3rd party developers , i am only going to play some ea games , but mostly first party games
i agree with ozzsoad, get over it, if you want better graphics for your little zombie gamego buy a360 or PS3. the wii is all about gameplay over graphics. I highly believe that the wii gameplay is Twice as good as any other game console and I love my 360. We all bought the Wii knowing we werent getting graphics compared to either of the other consoles, and complaining about it isn't going to make it better, so let it go the graphics arn't ever going to be great on this console. Rickettsz0780
That or we could somehow make my Zombie game idea.
All I can think of when I look at them is... every zombie looks exactly the same... A dev that does that isn't going to care about 'jaggies' or anything else for that matter. And it is pointless to complain about it. raahsnavj
Either that, or blue jeans with rips in them were really popular where this outbreak occured.
It's House of the Dead, what more do you want? It's about killing zombies not stopping and going "oooh look, I can't see jaggies around that mean looking flesh eating creature. Oh and look, that tree looks so life-like, see how it flows in the breeze?" Get over it.ozzsoad
LMAO!
That's on purpose...
It's a direct port of House of the Dead 2 so they didn't fancy up any graphics.
Dark_Link142
dido...
I would have agree with the TC if he/she had said this about Alone in the Dark, i`m not asking for ps3 graphics but a lil better (of what i saw a couple of weeks back) would have being nice. You know at least use what the Wii can do. Now of course those may have not being the final graphics *crosses fingers*
But on topic, it was ment as direct port so even if this game were on 360 or ps3 it would have had same graphics... imo..
It's a quick port of a budget-priced title do you really think they would go to all the effort of making a gme in 720p?Popadophalis
why would they make it in 720 when the Wii only supports up to 480? it would be nice i suppose.
We're lucky they updated the graphics at all. It's an 8 and 10 year old port.
And in all fairness, the Dreamcast version still looks pretty good, after 10 years.
if your a gamer u can't just own a wii but u can sure do without 1, I think that says a lot about the system.Zeekeal
Three of the world's top selling 10 (and still current) video game series' are owned/created by Nintendo. You're wrong.
i know how to get better graphics send a message to nintendo tell nintendo that you need to upgrade the wii graphics and that what people to do to tell nintendo to make games thay wantlouisfoxtonNintendo is doing a great job at making games, its just those da** 3rd party game companies, who seem to give the console such a bad rep. Remember the P**ptastic company who made ninja bread man?
This topic is pointless.
We knew ahead of time that all we were getting was a PORT OF HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2 AND 3. Thats ALL IT IS. NOTHING MORE. So, of course its going to look like the original game, considering it IS IT and stuff.
And its impossible to not have fun with The House of the Dead anyway, especially the second one.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment