@Black_Knight_00 said:
@Randolph said:
I'll be very interested to see if this "petit standard" for harsh score deductions when a game does "nothing new" is applied to the yearly sports and Call of Duty games.
I'm not a fan of the "does nothing new" criticism. New ideas in general are few and far between, I think there is absolutely nothing wrong with "more of the same" if the material was good to start with.
People can't expect developers to make a game every two years and find something revolutionary with each new installment. It's just unrealistic.
I'm not either. I just find it entertaining how every few years a game get's slammed for bringing nothing new to the table, but then that standard seems to just melt away when the yearly juggernauts arrive. Then all of a sudden they admit it has nothing new, but what IS there is excuted so well that it is still a great game. (mark my words some game reviewed after this one will have something to that effect) I just find the constantly shifting double standards in reviews hilarious here, and even near on saints like GregK were not immune to doing this. (DMC3 is too HARD, I am docking points... DMC3 Special Edition is lacks the original games difficulty, I am docking points... wait... what??)
I say all of this as an amused outsider when it comes to reviews, those things are purchasing guides. I don't need a purchasing guide on the new Batman, because I already knew I didn't want to get it any time soon anyway. Hell, I'm buying a $500 gaming system in November for ONE game, Killer Instinct, and I already know that game will be slaughtered here, if it gets review at all. I'm forecasting a 5 or 6 review score. (won't comment on potential content of the written review because GS has absolutely no fighting game proficient members on it's staff, so it won't matter and likely won't be terribly well informed)
But that isn't relevant to me, because again, reviews are a purchasing guide for people who have not made up their minds already. People really do need to keep that in perspective.
Log in to comment