The article, "10 things to make the PS3 worth buying" to be retracted.

  • 171 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts
[QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"] That's fine. But we're going here each day to actually find some light for the PS3, then this happened... It's belittling, I tell you.

It's really not belittling. It's conveying that there is a LOT of good about the PS3, but at its pricepoint, its current configuration of options and systems, and its current selection of games and features for those games, it's in an almost, but not quite, situation, and that's all the editors are commenting on. Most of the things they speak of are relatively small things to fix, if you look at it, and it's not like they are saying that the system sucks or isn't worth it for anyone.
Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
[QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"]

Signed... How could they write this?

Right after Sony's GDC big momment...

I don't understand... I'm trying so hard not to say that they're biased because I just got suspended for doing so... but wow...

Skylock00
Well, GS really isn't as biased as many people claim, because it seems like every year, people accuse them of being biased for someone else. I remember back when the PSP and DS came out, everyone claimed that GS hated Nintendo, was biased for Sony, and that prepetuated for quite some time, regardless of what happened.


I agree,but in my opinion i'm not really surprised at how someone can view Gamespot as being biased,with such articles and 1 page Ps3 reviews,you can see how a supporter of the Ps3 might view all this...

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
signed
wasnt need after GDC
xboxshenron


i don't see how GDC changes any of the facts in the editorial, it's almost as if the majority of people didn't even read it :?
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
[QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"][QUOTE="Skylock00"][QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"] But right now after GDC, things should be looking up for the PS3... then all of the sudden they write the article. I'm a lost for word here.

I simply think you're making too big of a deal over this matter, as are a lot of other people, IMHO.

That's fine. But we're going here each day to actually find some light for the PS3, then this happened... It's belittling, I tell you.

Come into it with a different attitude, then. Forget about system loyalties and buy what you like best. I didn't care for the PSP at all when it first came out, but I bought one last September when things got better for it. Rather than root for a system, buy something that has the games you want to play. The name Xbox carries no more weight to me than PlayStation does this time around, whereas last time around the name Xbox had a connotation of immature fanboys. If this sort of behavior keeps up, it's going to be PlayStation that has the immature angry fanboy connotation.
Avatar image for wizeguy41
wizeguy41

296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 wizeguy41
Member since 2006 • 296 Posts
signed....
Avatar image for stan618
stan618

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 stan618
Member since 2006 • 267 Posts
co siggity
Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
There's nothing wrong with the article. They're telling it like it is and they paint a bright future for the console. It didn't seem bad to me. The reality now is that the system isn't selling well. The article made me feel as though the PS3 will do well, which is something that I haven't been feeling for a long time.
The article is fine. You are overreacting.
Avatar image for version2pnt0
version2pnt0

424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 version2pnt0
Member since 2005 • 424 Posts
Signed.
Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts
[QUOTE="Skylock00"][QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"] That's fine. But we're going here each day to actually find some light for the PS3, then this happened... It's belittling, I tell you.

It's really not belittling. It's conveying that there is a LOT of good about the PS3, but at its pricepoint, its current configuration of options and systems, and its current selection of games and features for those games, it's in an almost, but not quite, situation, and that's all the editors are commenting on. Most of the things they speak of are relatively small things to fix, if you look at it, and it's not like they are saying that the system sucks or isn't worth it for anyone.

But we all knew that. Why now? Why after GDC? And there was so many little things that were just inane.
Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
Fumpa ^ ,your point about overreacting bears some truth.

But in all honesty,I believe it's more to do with the article's timing that makes people believe GameSpot are being biased.It's like,Sony finally gets something right,and instead of GameSpot shining light into what they got right at GDC and give them their props,they attempt to put them down again.

To me it doesnt really matter:I've played games on Playstations since the days of TestDrive,a negative article on Sony wont change nor affect my view on the greatest videogame company to date.
Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts
[QUOTE="ParasiteEveLust"] But we all knew that. Why now? Why after GDC?

Because while the GDC was a step in the right direction, the editorial is meant to express that it isn't quite enough to make up for the issues that the system has at the moment, I suspect. Furthermore, Alex Navarro brought up a VERY troubling issue in his latest blog entry about Motorstorm.
Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts
[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"][QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"][QUOTE="Skylock00"][QUOTE="Sexy_FFVII"] But right now after GDC, things should be looking up for the PS3... then all of the sudden they write the article. I'm a lost for word here.

I simply think you're making too big of a deal over this matter, as are a lot of other people, IMHO.

That's fine. But we're going here each day to actually find some light for the PS3, then this happened... It's belittling, I tell you.

Come into it with a different attitude, then. Forget about system loyalties and buy what you like best. I didn't care for the PSP at all when it first came out, but I bought one last September when things got better for it. Rather than root for a system, buy something that has the games you want to play. The name Xbox carries no more weight to me than PlayStation does this time around, whereas last time around the name Xbox had a connotation of immature fanboys. If this sort of behavior keeps up, it's going to be PlayStation that has the immature angry fanboy connotation.

I think if GameSpot keep on like this, the word PlayStation will obviously have that immature angry fanboy connotation, but I think it already had from the very beginning.
Avatar image for the_dunadan
the_dunadan

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 the_dunadan
Member since 2003 • 144 Posts
Signed.
Avatar image for KageMonkey
KageMonkey

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 KageMonkey
Member since 2003 • 660 Posts
Starting from the comparison article of the graphical powers of the PS3 and the Xbox360 -- in which many of the comparisons were chosen to cause the PS3 to look especially poor, to the consistent low review scores in relation to other sites, it has became more and more apparent that either: a) Gamespot is trying to take it upon themselves to teach Sony a lesson, or b) a competitor (known for buying their way into various markets) has been buying their way into the media. The latest article is no different. It is another Sony article that contain some truth, but also contains absurd notions that lacks any informed fact -- aiming to cause harm to Sony. Sure, some points in the article contain genuine legitimate concerns. However, there are few points which seem to have been thrown in just to make up "10 things". Firstly, the gripe about "Fix Online Fundamentals Before Going Home" was clearly not well-thought out. The Online Fundamentals are clearly what Home is trying to address. Some features will come with time, but in terms of content, it is exactly what Home will solve -- instead of Sony being the content providers, the users and developers will also be content providers. Secondly, Kevin VanOrd's "Change the Way We Play Games" is simply grasping for straws. Sure, Wii has "changed the way we play games", but how has the Xbox360 "change the way we play games"? By that logic, Kevin wouldn't be playing the Xbox360 either. Why the difference in opinion when Home offers just as much, if not more, than Xbox Live? Not only that, but to ask for spectator-mode is simply unfeasible due to the cost of development compared to how many people would actually use it. Think before writing such illogical ideas that is going to be posted on the first page. The worst of them all is Andrew's "Hardware and Product Support". Sure, I wouldn't want to waste $500-600 to find that the machine breaks the next day -- and that is the perfect reason NOT to buy an Xbox360. Did Andrew forget that the numerous hardware issues are suffered by the Xbox360 and not the PS3? Taken the above into consideration, there might be "7 things" on the list, but I can certainly make a list just as long for the Xbox360: And the number one point being "Provide Solid Hardware and Product Support".
Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts

[QUOTE="ParasiteEveLust"] But we all knew that. Why now? Why after GDC? Skylock00
Because while the GDC was a step in the right direction, the editorial is meant to express that it isn't quite enough to make up for the issues that the system has at the moment. Furthermore, Alex Navarro brought up a VERY troubling issue in his latest blog entry about Motorstorm.

GDC is not E3. And why can't they make an article about Xbox 360 or the Wii? Why single out the PS3?

And about Motorstorm, that's about the downloadable content, right? I don't know about that.

Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts

"But PlayStation Home will certainly have its applications. I look forward to getting invited to the private spaces of other users so they can show me their vast collection of ripped DVD porn films and mind-blowing animated GIFs. I also look forward to going to the Sponsored By Big Summer Movie Area, where I can watch the trailer for Big Summer Movie and perhaps even acquire a T-shirt with the logo for Big Summer Movie right on it!"

This was completely unnessesary. I don't understand. They do have ads in here right?

Avatar image for Evolutions999
Evolutions999

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Evolutions999
Member since 2006 • 129 Posts
Signed we are on to you Gamespot going against Sony is not good for a gaming site which gets to review Sony games before they come out.
Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts
[QUOTE="KageMonkey"]Starting from the comparison article of the graphical powers of the PS3 and the Xbox360 -- in which many of the comparisons were chosen to cause the PS3 to look especially poor, to the consistent low review scores in relation to other sites, it has became more and more apparent that either: a) Gamespot is trying to take it upon themselves to teach Sony a lesson, or b) a competitor (known for buying their way into various markets) has been buying their way into the media. The latest article is no different. It is another Sony article that contain some truth, but also contains absurd notions that lacks any informed fact -- aiming to cause harm to Sony. Sure, some points in the article contain genuine legitimate concerns. However, there are few points which seem to have been thrown in just to make up "10 things". Firstly, the gripe about "Fix Online Fundamentals Before Going Home" was clearly not well-thought out. The Online Fundamentals are clearly what Home is trying to address. Some features will come with time, but in terms of content, it is exactly what Home will solve -- instead of Sony being the content providers, the users and developers will also be content providers. Secondly, Kevin VanOrd's "Change the Way We Play Games" is simply grasping for straws. Sure, Wii has "changed the way we play games", but how has the Xbox360 "change the way we play games"? By that logic, Kevin wouldn't be playing the Xbox360 either. Why the difference in opinion when Home offers just as much, if not more, than Xbox Live? Not only that, but to ask for spectator-mode is simply unfeasible due to the cost of development compared to how many people would actually use it. Think before writing such illogical ideas that is going to be posted on the first page. The worst of them all is Andrew's "Hardware and Product Support". Sure, I wouldn't want to waste $500-600 to find that the machine breaks the next day -- and that is the perfect reason NOT to buy an Xbox360. Did Andrew forget that the numerous hardware issues are suffered by the Xbox360 and not the PS3? Taken the above into consideration, there might be "7 things" on the list, but I can certainly make a list just as long for the Xbox360: And the number one point being "Provide Solid Hardware and Product Support".

I completely agree. The part "Change the Way We Play Games" there was no mention at all about LittleBigPlanet... LBP is the innovation I've seen for awhile yet they couldn't mention anything about that.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
Signed we are on to you Gamespot going against Sony is not good for a gaming site which gets to review Sony games before they come out.Evolutions999
I suppose Gamespot was going against Nintendo when Twilight Princess didn't get a 9.x score, and they were going against Microsoft when Splinter Cell didn't get a 9.x score?
Avatar image for KageMonkey
KageMonkey

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 KageMonkey
Member since 2003 • 660 Posts
[QUOTE="Evolutions999"]Signed we are on to you Gamespot going against Sony is not good for a gaming site which gets to review Sony games before they come out.MAILER_DAEMON
I suppose Gamespot was going against Nintendo when Twilight Princess didn't get a 9.x score, and they were going against Microsoft when Splinter Cell didn't get a 9.x score?

Look at the consistent lower scores for Nintendo and Sony games compared to the gamerankings. And then look at the consistent higher scores for Microsoft games compared to gamerankings. Although I am not saying there is any bias, but there is definitely a trend.
Avatar image for stone_bro_racin
stone_bro_racin

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 stone_bro_racin
Member since 2006 • 51 Posts
Signed, i to would love to know why there wasn't any article like this one for the Xbox 360 and wii
Avatar image for slystallion26
slystallion26

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 slystallion26
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts
Where do i sign?
Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
Fumpa ^ ,your point about overreacting bears some truth.

But in all honesty,I believe it's more to do with the article's timing that makes people believe GameSpot are being biased.It's like,Sony finally gets something right,and instead of GameSpot shining light into what they got right at GDC and give them their props,they attempt to put them down again.

To me it doesnt really matter:I've played games on Playstations since the days of TestDrive,a negative article on Sony wont change nor affect my view on the greatest videogame company to date.
Dualshockin
Ah, I see now. Thanks for clearing it up for me.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"][QUOTE="Evolutions999"]Signed we are on to you Gamespot going against Sony is not good for a gaming site which gets to review Sony games before they come out.KageMonkey
I suppose Gamespot was going against Nintendo when Twilight Princess didn't get a 9.x score, and they were going against Microsoft when Splinter Cell didn't get a 9.x score?

Look at the consistent lower scores for Nintendo and Sony games compared to the gamerankings. And then look at the consistent higher scores for Microsoft games compared to gamerankings. Although I am not saying there is any bias, but there is definitely a trend.

...Right, especially when you consider that Gamespot ranks games differently than a lot of other sites. Maybe the 360 has been out longer and has better games at this point? The PS2 wasn't exactly shattering walls with its launch games, and neither was the 360. I think this is a case of barking up the wrong tree. The blame of whatever is going on doesn't belong with Gamespot.
Avatar image for ParasiteEveLust
ParasiteEveLust

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 ParasiteEveLust
Member since 2005 • 1545 Posts
Where do i sign?slystallion26
Just write it here.
Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts
[QUOTE="KageMonkey"] Look at the consistent lower scores for Nintendo and Sony games compared to the gamerankings. And then look at the consistent higher scores for Microsoft games compared to gamerankings. Although I am not saying there is any bias, but there is definitely a trend.

That doesn't really say anything, though, from what I see, and doesn't really imply any sort of inherent bias or fanboyism of the site in general, because there are times where GS rates several games on either Nintendo or Sony games as higher than other sites, and the other way around for Microsoft games.
Avatar image for sm66612
sm66612

453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 sm66612
Member since 2004 • 453 Posts
I agree!
Signed!
Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts
I must say even though this "GS is bias" thing is crap, that article was really unnecessary. At first glance it seems it's trying to help the ps3, but once you read it's a whole different thing altogether.

*signed*
Avatar image for Funglip
Funglip

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Funglip
Member since 2004 • 458 Posts
The only problem i see on the article is its title, the term "worth buying" to be exact.  The PS3 worth 600 bucks by itself, with blu-ray and stuffs.However by a video game console, it may not be as of yet; and i see nth wrong w/ their suggestions.What's wrong w/ the article is its poor execution of the title to make them seem saying "the ps3 as a whole is not worth buying right now"
Avatar image for sdifjds
sdifjds

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 sdifjds
Member since 2003 • 1088 Posts
Signed. I am normally not one to get into the whole bias thing, but this article seems awfully timed and ill-suited. Furthermore, it's really misleading. You lured users in with an interesting title that could be really constructive and positive towards Sony, but by the time the reader is done with the first paragraph it becomes painfully obvious this is no good will gesture towards the PS3. Also, for an article about the PS3, you praise the Xbox 360 just about every chance you guys get... I don't know.. It just looks bad. Sorry.
Avatar image for dragonsack
dragonsack

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 dragonsack
Member since 2007 • 210 Posts

I'm also a bit shocked. Not sure what else I'm feeling at the moment; mixed reactions. Still some effort has been put into the article. Even if it's not taken down, some parts really need to be edited. Way too blunt and/or unjustified. Especially on the Home service which is still not out yet so no one knows how it works in practice, yet is being criticised on. I found "Sony needs to rip off Xbox Live" to be really offensive.

Edit: As the internet doesn't portray tone very well, I'm not bashing GS at all. I am just expressing concern about the article.

-Antisocial-
did the srticle said "sony needs to rip off xbox live"???
Avatar image for sdifjds
sdifjds

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 sdifjds
Member since 2003 • 1088 Posts
[QUOTE="-Antisocial-"]

I'm also a bit shocked. Not sure what else I'm feeling at the moment; mixed reactions. Still some effort has been put into the article. Even if it's not taken down, some parts really need to be edited. Way too blunt and/or unjustified. Especially on the Home service which is still not out yet so no one knows how it works in practice, yet is being criticised on. I found "Sony needs to rip off Xbox Live" to be really offensive.

Edit: As the internet doesn't portray tone very well, I'm not bashing GS at all. I am just expressing concern about the article.

dragonsack
did the srticle said "sony needs to rip off xbox live"???

Yes
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
The intent may have been there GameSpot, but this feature just does not deliver. It seems like the title should read "10 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Buy A PS3", because thats all anyone can take away from it.
Avatar image for dragonsack
dragonsack

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 dragonsack
Member since 2007 • 210 Posts
[QUOTE="dragonsack"][QUOTE="-Antisocial-"]

I'm also a bit shocked. Not sure what else I'm feeling at the moment; mixed reactions. Still some effort has been put into the article. Even if it's not taken down, some parts really need to be edited. Way too blunt and/or unjustified. Especially on the Home service which is still not out yet so no one knows how it works in practice, yet is being criticised on. I found "Sony needs to rip off Xbox Live" to be really offensive.

Edit: As the internet doesn't portray tone very well, I'm not bashing GS at all. I am just expressing concern about the article.

sdifjds
did the srticle said "sony needs to rip off xbox live"???

Yes

i wish someone post this on the 1up.com and try to get the 1up your to talk about this!!!! can someone post it there and let see how other people in their profestion think about this!!!
Avatar image for dragonsack
dragonsack

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 dragonsack
Member since 2007 • 210 Posts
The intent may have been there GameSpot, but this feature just does not deliver. It seems like the title should read "10 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Buy A PS3", because thats all anyone can take away from it.KeyWii
when i saw that that article i thought gamespot was trying to get people to buy a ps3. but after what i just readed, i know gamespot didnt do it's job!!!
Avatar image for -Antisocial-
-Antisocial-

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 -Antisocial-
Member since 2003 • 372 Posts

To those who say we are "overreacting": quite clearly, an overraction of this scale must mean that something is wrong. Look at system wars. Look at the PS3 forum. Regardless of the sticky that says calling GS bias will impose upon you a minimum 5 day suspension, I've seen many today who disregarded that warning. So many people unanimously drawing the same conclusion... surely, that's basis enough to say we have grounds for "overreacting".

 I think I speak for others when I say we know what GS was trying to do by pointing out the PS3's faults. But in a manner that is so degrading, THAT is unacceptable. Quite frankly, I just don't think "Basically, Sony needs to rip off Xbox Live. If Sony can do that, then it will at least make the decision to purchase an Xbox 360 game versus a PlayStation 3 game a little less one-sided" (along with other glorious quotes) should be said, even in an editorial, by supposely-credible people who review games. It may be an opinion, but it's expressed unprofessionally.

By the way, thanks to everyone for keeping a such a heated topic like this civil.

Edit: Props to Brad Shoemaker and Aaron Thomas for their part in the tipping point. I feel that their approach to writing it is how the rest of the article should be.

Avatar image for dragonsack
dragonsack

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 dragonsack
Member since 2007 • 210 Posts
[QUOTE="-Antisocial-"]To those who say we are "overreacting": quite clearly, an overraction of this scale must mean that something is wrong. Look at system wars. Look at the PS3 forum. Regardless of the sticky that says calling GS bias will impose upon you a minimum 5 day suspension, I've seen many today who disregarded that warning. So many people unanimously drawing the same conclusion... surely, that's basis enough to say we have grounds for "overreacting". I think I speak for others when I say we know what GS was trying to do by pointing out the PS3's faults. But in a manner that is so degrading, THAT is unacceptable. Quite frankly, I just don't think "Basically, Sony needs to rip off Xbox Live. If Sony can do that, then it will at least make the decision to purchase an Xbox 360 game versus a PlayStation 3 game a little less one-sided" (along with other glorious quotes) should be said, even in an editorial, by supposely-credible people who review games. It may be an opinion, but it's expressed unprofessionally. By the way, thanks to everyone for keeping a such a heated topic like this civil.

why would anyone tell the ps3 to just copy xbox live??? you have to think about what you said because if i want my ps3 to be like xbox live i would have just go out and get a xbox that already have a install base!!! pluss you can ask sony to downgrade their ps3 online intention when you havent even try out the home serves!!!
Avatar image for diggyzoom
diggyzoom

19616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 diggyzoom
Member since 2005 • 19616 Posts
I thought most of the content contained in legitimate gripes was handled in very poor taste. I mean , look at the last comment from Aaron Thomas. You couldn't say uhhhhh ........ RR7 , Resistance , VF5 , Motorstorm ??? You guys don't like great games anymore ?

Very poor taste.Even my opposing buddies from System Wars would have put together something with better content bashing the ps3. Maybe Gamespot has to meet some kind of quota this month as far as hits go I don't know , but the article was rubbish.

.




Avatar image for bk170
bk170

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 bk170
Member since 2006 • 168 Posts
signed......by Bp0wter
Avatar image for Tamarind_Face
Tamarind_Face

2270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Tamarind_Face
Member since 2007 • 2270 Posts
Signed, But I think Users should contact Cnet because they own Gamespot.
Avatar image for Gamefisher86
Gamefisher86

588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#92 Gamefisher86
Member since 2004 • 588 Posts
Signed
Avatar image for badkolo
badkolo

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 badkolo
Member since 2005 • 26 Posts

once again you guys must be 16 years old.

the ps3 looks bad without this article, he tells the truth, i own a ps3 andbesides motorstorm i dont use it, i have no friends on it, chatting doesnt work well and its not made for online as of now.

But  a guy makes an artivcle which almost every site till now has basicaly said and you guys cry like children.

The ps3 has no games and has no unifies system, it has power and potential but i pay to play not to wait 3 years, it must hurt you all knowing that the 360 is doing so well and does everything so much better then the ps3 for now.

Avatar image for MisterEngilsh
MisterEngilsh

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 MisterEngilsh
Member since 2007 • 104 Posts

once again you guys must be 16 years old.

the ps3 looks bad without this article, he tells the truth, i own a ps3 andbesides motorstorm i dont use it, i have no friends on it, chatting doesnt work well and its not made for online as of now.

But a guy makes an artivcle which almost every site till now has basicaly said and you guys cry like children.

The ps3 has no games and has no unifies system, it has power and potential but i pay to play not to wait 3 years, it must hurt you all knowing that the 360 is doing so well and does everything so much better then the ps3 for now.

badkolo


There is no need to post an article such as that one on a mainstream platform such as GS. The article offers little in the way of substance, rehashing issues that have been beaten to death and are being adressed as we speak.

Exclusive titles? They will come with a larger install base.

Unified online? What do you think home is?

Seriously, if you don't use your PS3, just do us all a favor and return it.

BTW: I will sign.
Avatar image for dancinaps
dancinaps

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 dancinaps
Member since 2005 • 374 Posts
Signed
Avatar image for Gokuja
Gokuja

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Gokuja
Member since 2005 • 3767 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"]The intent may have been there GameSpot, but this feature just does not deliver. It seems like the title should read "10 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Buy A PS3", because thats all anyone can take away from it.dragonsack
when i saw that that article i thought gamespot was trying to get people to buy a ps3. but after what i just readed, i know gamespot didnt do it's job!!!

i don't see why they complain about the online, if any console needs that talk its the Wii.  and as for hardware problems yes they have had their problems, but the ps3 has been without any big problems so far, gamespot should have meantioned that at least.

the whole trophy thing was horrible and pointless, compare it to achievements its the same thing, different form but their not complaining about that.  as for the high price point, as people have meantioned over and over again, you are not gonna just spend $400 on a 360 and call it good, your either getting live, microphones, hddvd, or other "choices".  microsoft just did a good job of dividing the costs to make it look cheaper.  sony just said, here it is, you get everything that should be included, no addons.

and gs was kinda selfish in that article.  it was all me me me, i want this, why can't i get that.  just because they think that will make things better for sony doesn't mean it will, although I'm sure some things will.  This type of journalism isn't helping the gaming industry, if they want their jobs they need to support it.  and im not saying to lie, but that article was not written well. 

they should either rewrite it or take it down

Avatar image for PaintballinDude
PaintballinDude

1092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 PaintballinDude
Member since 2004 • 1092 Posts
Signed.