Dragon's Dogma Online? All hopes, all dreams of 2015, of this gen, has been crushed. I literally expected nothing good from Capcom and still got disappointed
@neonmoss The first game was built with artistic story in mind. Churches and item descriptions told a myriad of stories. Hordes of enemies were not frustratingly hard. Contrary to popular belief, the theme of the game is not to die at every turn, but rather, being rewarded for being skilled enough to get in Death's face and laugh and you are now it's master. The second game...didn't really do that. Enemies want to kill you and the mechanics of DS2 are focused around dying than trying to outplay 100 enemies. In fact, the PvP is kind of destroyed, especially for DEX players. But it's still a great game.
You guys should see a list of all the awesome stuff they cut out of the final design. Bet you all of that will sold as DLC too. Another $300 investment. Poor Sims fans...
@Saidrex You say you're a harsh reviewer, yet despite the constant framerate drops, invisible walls, terrible and lengthy story, horrificly designed psycho battles, and the bland environment, you would give this game anything above a 5. This game has as much humor as a Transformer movie, with the main character having no sense of where he is, whether it be in an apocalypse or a movie, and acts with little consistency. You just want to give it a higher score becuase of le epik zombie explosionz.
I've come to the conclusion that you are Micheal Bay and therefore have your opinion invalidated.
People complain so much when a game is rated under 7. Did you not read the review? They said the writing is bad and the missions are repetitive. Yeah, the graphics are nice and the multiplayer is solid, but other than that, it's just a boring grindfest. The rating 6 is, as it says right next to the number, fair. That means, it's not too bad, but it's not too good either. Some will love it, others will find it boring, and overall a solid game in need of polishing. Since when did anything below 7, which is not halfway on the bar, but 2/3 up the bar, means it's crap? Also, in now way is this a 9. A 9 is near perfect, almost with no flaws that destroy an average gamer's experience. If you like the game, great, but don't sit here thinking it deserves more than 6 or 7. That number up there doesn't even matter.
In an age where The Walking Dead and Gone Home get high ratings, even though they are more of an interactive narrative with poorly implemented gameplay to try and pass it off as a game, and there are idiots out there that think they are the pinnacles of games, I'm not suprised by how many dislike your review. You probably knew this was going to happen. I thank you for not being like the other sheep, going against this mislead fanbase to give an honest review. They could have done so much better in terms of gameplay. I will agree, 4 is a bit harsh, but it is definitely not an 10/10 or even an 8. Nothing in the game pushes you to go forward. The story just goes on with out you, and it drags you through tedious shooter arenas to get to the next point.
LoL has enough money and viewers to survive. Dota 2 could use some of the exposure too, so no hard feelings. Also, they said citing the proximity next LoL World's event.
xzMasteRzx's comments