That's because 90%+ of PCs aren't built for gaming.
Gaming PCs can handle Mass Effect at a higher quality than ANY console can, though. Velocitas8
Even the majority of "gaming" PCs (other than the super high-end ones) wouldn't be able to run Mass Effect. And even on the super high-end ones it would probably still be choppy.
[QUOTE="viper7721"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]it's not the developer it's ps3, why is oblivion downgraded? why is splinter cell downgraded? the darkness? f.e.a.r? tony hawk? call of duty 3? hmm because ps3 hardware less powerful than xbox 360 and devs did the best they can with weak ps3 hardware they could.
sega is more of a sony fan than microsoft anyway and still sucks lol.mazdero
Very true. The PS3 is significantly weaker than the 360.
You're a fanboy as well. PS3 and 360 are almost equal, with the nod going to PS3.Look in the PS3 forum and read the article from IGN and see if oblivion is downgraded. How can you make that claim with ZERO proof to back it up. when you develope game for both systems, then you can talk.
360 and PS3 are not equal. The 360 is significantly more powerful than the PS3. Look at how all the multiplat games look better on the 360. Look at how GeOW looks better than any PS3 game. Look at how Kameo (a launch 360 game) looks better than any PS3 game. The 360 is just a more powerful system.
it's not the developer it's ps3, why is oblivion downgraded? why is splinter cell downgraded? the darkness? f.e.a.r? tony hawk? call of duty 3? hmm because ps3 hardware less powerful than xbox 360 and devs did the best they can with weak ps3 hardware they could.
sega is more of a sony fan than microsoft anyway and still sucks lol.mcdonaldsfdfd
Very true. The PS3 is significantly weaker than the 360.
Log in to comment