theone86's forum posts

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@mrbojangles25: For all their faults, Valve is really good at what they do. Steam's definitely got some problems here and there, but they've built up a really user-friendly ecosystem with an amazing selection and good support features. A big part of the reason why they're still on top is because no one's done anything that would dethrone them.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@jeezers: The kids give me hope for the future. Honestly, when I get really depressed from fighting with Boomers I usually think to myself: at least the next generation is turning out alright.

@AFBrat77 said:

@theone86:

You need to learn to count....none of the microgenerations are 4 years, each is 5 as I stated. None are eleven. My point is, you aren't born on the last day of say Baby Boomers and those born next day are Generation X, that's ridiculous. They are way too different. Same goes between X and Millennials and Millennials and Z.....there are real generations between. I can easily be called Gen X also, as 1961 is also used as an X starting point. But Generation Jones is a real thing and we know it. Even the Boomers know we aren't part of their hippie/Vietnam/I love JFK crowd, we came of age in the late 70's and yeah we were the generation at the vanguard of the PC movement. We had nothing to do with those born late 40's.

Ditto for Xennials, grew up with analog until high school and things went digital.

Generations caught between.

I think you need to learn to count. 1959-1946=13 years; 1964-1960=4 years; 1976-1965=11 years.

I think most people realize that not every person born in a given year will exactly fit into that generation. In fact, most people realize that at the years closest to a generational border people are less likely to fit into one generation or the other. Most people say that President Obama is Gen X in spirit, even though he's technically a Boomer. That doesn't mean that we can invent these nonsensical and inconsistent categories to try to shoehorn people into, it doesn't solve the problem.

In fact, there are plenty of people who don't fit into your categories. I was born in 86, but I grew up with mostly analog technology. And as for the emergence of the PC, Wozniak was born in 1950, Jobs and Gates in 55. You weren't the vanguard of anything, you just happened to be around when companies started selling PCs as consumer products.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@AFBrat77 said:

@theone86:

Thanks for bumping up my post with your garbage :). I suppose if the boom continued from '46 - '85 they would all be Boomers right? Because that's all that holds them together. Microgenerations are real, you aren't born 1 day after the previous generation and become another generation. By your idiot "logic" last day of 64 you are completely a hippie Boomer, first day of '65 you are suddenly transformed into MTV video gamer X. No chance. Think! Boomers is not a 20 year generation.

And by your "idiot logic" one generation lasts thirteen years, the next one four, and the next one eleven, how does that make sense? Generations as officially classified last an average of 25 years, with subsequent ones usually not varying from the next by more than a couple of years. Boomers are, in fact, one of the smallest recent generations. If anything, Gen X and the pre-silent Generation should be made smaller and the Boomer generation should be made larger. Twenty years is enough time for the people born at the beginning of a generation to experience roughly the same events as the people born at the end of a generation, albeit at different stages in their respective lives.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

I’m not into streaming my games so something like this does nothing for me. Now if Microsoft ever decide to make an actual dedicated system like the Switch that plays games that I can buy on a physical format then I would definitely be interested.

I'd be cautiously interested in this. I know latency is always going to be an issue until they fix our country's wireless network (read: never), but it does solve some issues. For one, it gets rid of the need to buy a high-end system to play high-end games, and the need to buy a lot of storage to install all those games. It also (theoretically) gets rid of exclusivity as the whole thing seems to be an app that runs on compatible phones, which also gets rid of the need to constantly upgrade to a new system. It could also free developers to do bigger things with their games, as they don't need to worry about making the game fit on a certain size game card or within a certain standard for a reasonably sized file. I'd be most worried about what happens to my game data if I ever needed to pause my subscription, but other than that I welcome the day when I don't have to carry around cartridges or worry about filling a hard drive.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@IgGy621985 said:

Probably not, but I hope Epic hurts Steam even more because the competition is good for the end-user.

Valve became super lazy in the past several years.

I agree with you in theory, but the problem is the competition is not honest. If Epic offered something that actually competes with Valve--good prices, a large library, community-driven forums and guides and so on, mod support, and all that stuff--that would be fine.

But they don't. All they offer is exclusives, and that's fucking horseshit.

Yeah, I agree. Forums, guides, mod support is what's definitely missing at Epic Store at this time. Also, their sales aren't that great either.

But, they're a good, solid competition which made Valve do SOMETHING. I believe Epic did a great job as a competing side on this market because Valve got EA back, and they got Microsoft on their storefront.

Personally, I don't give a shit about having my games on one platform. I already have probably all the clients installed on my PC. But I do understand some people might be against that.

But monopoly is never good for the customer. Never. I seriously want Epic to do more. This competition is great for the customer.

I don't care that much about having all my games on one client, but I do worry about having them spread out among too many clients. I really hated all the dev-specific platforms like EA origin, especially when there didn't seem to be any benefit to using them. GOG and Humble Bundle offer enough that's different from Steam to keep them going and keep Valve on their heels. I don't see what Epic Store does in that regard, and I especially hated the exclusivity aspect. It's like most of what I hated about Origin combined with nothing of what I liked from GOG/Humble.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts
@ad1x2 said:
@Baconstrip78 said:

If your husband openly ridicules a city’s beloved elected official and civil rights leader, and then calls part of that city a rat-infested cesspool, then you probably shouldn’t give a speech to kids who live there unless it’s a public apology.

It's not like there is anything to apologize for in what he said. He could have been a little more presidential about it, but he's right if you look at the videos that came out of Baltimore showing how bad the place was.

Loading Video...

Catherine Pugh was the former Democratic mayor of Baltimore saying those things about that part of the city, but when Trump said it critics said he was lying and probably saying it because he was racist. People that tried to counter him by showing pictures of the nicer parts of Baltimore like the Inner Harbor were like people trying to counter criticism of Mexico by showing pictures of Cancún.

By the way, Pugh was the third mayor in a row to leave in disgrace (the second to resign in a ten year period) and she just plead guilty to several federal charges, with several more she has to go to trial for. If your response is "But Trump..." he's already being investigated for his alleged misdeeds, and the problems Baltimore deals with started prior to January 2017.

Do you not understand context or something? She was remarking on poor conditions with the implication that she wanted to do something to fix it. Trump was using the poor conditions to insult an entire city and discredit their opinions.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@zaryia said:
@r-gamer said:

Classes lefties... no surprise.

Lmao imagine being anti-cyber bullying and then trump being the biggest cyber bully.

Bad luck Mellenia.

It's like if Reagan smoked mountains of crack every day.

Trump supporters: Lock her up!

Liberals: Boo!

Trump supporters: You guys lack class!

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@Stevo_the_gamer said:
@theone86 said:
@Stevo_the_gamer said:

@theone86: The bigger hits come from the large scale counterfeiting operations. Criminals will exploit the system in any way they can, regardless of the legality/regulation that's imposed. To be honest, I'm not even sure what your argument even entails at this point. Very bizarre.

My argument is that I have a front row seat to the dirtiest, sleaziest, most corrupt police department in the country, so I know why badges want to keep weed criminalized. They regularly raid illegal drug operations in order to keep the dirty money for themselves, and if cannabis is legalized then they lose a potential revenue stream. No wonder, then, that they were able to literally dictate terms to the state legislature when they didn't like the first draft of the legislation that would legalize it.

"Cops will exploit the system in any way they can, regardless of the legality/regulation that's imposed."

Fixed.

Oh, you're arguing there's an underlying conspiracy.

Yeah, there's no conspiracy dude, it's fact. Two cops just got sentenced for this exact thing this last month, and there is a long and documented history of cops in my area raiding drug warehouses without making a single arrest. That's on top of the fact that they got caught red-handed trying to cover up evidence that eventually led to the conviction of a cop for murder and battery, that a high-ranking police officer ran a legitimate torture ring out of our police department, and an on-going investigation into a cop who ran his own drug ring and framed project residents in order to cover it up. The fact that you would try to paint police corruption as a conspiracy just solidifies in my mind that you're dirty yourself.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@ad1x2 said:
@theone86 said:

The more you talk better my argument sounds. Michael Vick didn't have the stats of Tom Brady or Ben Roethlisberger either, yet he was allowed back into the league. In fact, if you're saying that the bar for being signed by a team if you have even a hint of controversy is that you have to be as good as a generational talent who just might be the best player ever in the game, then I think you again made my point for me. Not to mention that there are PLENTY of players who have done far worse and gotten far less punishment. Jayron Kearse, Anthony Chickillo, Tyrel Dodson, Ryan Griffen, Mark Walton, Trevor Bates, and those are just the cases from this year. You could seriously fill an entire minor league with players less talented than Kaepernick who were given second and third chances for less. Like I said, he was a STARTING QUARTERBACK on a PLAYOFF TEAM. That would be enough to get anyone a job on an NFL roster, unless they kneeled of course. Not to mention the elephant in the room, he didn't actually do anything wrong. These people, who are less talented than him, are getting in drunken brawls and assaulting their girlfriends, and you're saying he got what he deserved because he kneeled? That makes my argument for me perfectly.

And this absolutely is about the anthem. Several GMs and other sources have said as much, and that if he hadn't have kneeled he'd still be playing. Plenty more have said that he has the talent to be a starter, but no one is going to sign him. Yes, it's 2019, which is why crap like that is ridiculous. It doesn't matter if it's 2019, it doesn't matter if he plays in San Francisco. The owners made a collective decision to shut him out of the league because they're running a faux-patriotism factory first and a sports league second.

You’re trying to make this into some huge injustice over Kap wanting to flex his First Amendment rights, but the NFL doesn’t have to let him kneel if he wants a job just like McDonald’s doesn’t have to let a cashier wear a Black Lives Matter t-shirt at the register. Kneeling was not his only action that made him a risky acquisition, I already mentioned the pig socks and there are a few other things to include a recent visit he did at Alcatraz Island. He could possibly have a job right now if he showed up to a practice at the Falcon’s facility in Atlanta. But instead of coming to the event the NFL set up for him he decides to pull out at the last minute and play at a high school several miles away while wearing a Kunta Kinte shirt.

Well the message has been heard loud and clear: he has the First Amendment right to say what he wants and the NFL has the right as an employer to not hire him. Him implying that racism is the reason he’s not in the NFL is laughable when 70 percent of the players are black, with salaries averaging in the millions for many of them. 200 players, many of whom were black, kneeled the day after a Trump rally when the president said what he really felt about players that kneeled.

I’ll partially concede to your opinion that the kneeling seems to be a bigger problem to the NFL than the ones that have criminal records. But the reason why they may see it as a bigger deal now is because he is making it a bigger deal. Those team owners don’t want all of that drama over a second or third string quarterback. On the other hand, many of the players with records don’t bring their drama to the field.

Ah, so might makes right? Jawohl, dude.

He is not a second or third string quarterback, he was a STARTING QUARTERBACK on a PLAYOFF TEAM. This is a league where second string quarterbacks are often given large contracts just based on the fact that they don't completely suck. Just this past week the Jaguars benched their starter, who used to be the quarterback of the future for a whole different team. Teams will grasp at any straw to get a good quarterback, except, like I said, one who kneels.

What happens if it starts becoming bad for business to point to the sky? Are you going to advocate for the league to shut down players' freedom of expression in the name of profits, or are you going to throw a shit fit over freedom of religion?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

54

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

2010 Republicans: We are going to launch investigations into every single aspect of Obama's presidency and you can't stop us!

2019 Republicans: It is an abomination that you are investigating our president and it amounts to a coup, do something useful with congressional power! Also, we're launching counter-investigations into Democratic figures to further our own political narratives.