King of the Fighters XIV

it's not the prettiest game, but it's the best and most satisfying execution of any fighter this gen, the skill cap for this game is also far higher than Street Fighter V.

The game to beat that will be SNK's Samurai Sprites

Since lemmings have now all jumped on the XBL damage control argument...

Are you lemmings finally admitting that xbox the worst selection of MP games among any of the major console providers????

I mean you can't have it both ways since you're all claiming it was only XBL that made you claim Xbox has the best multiplayer and, as we know, don't care about the actual MP game quality.

So what's the declaration lems...Ya'll like xbox only for the service and don't care about having the worst MP selection now?

Way to backtrack again lem...did YOU just insinuate that"I" was the one who first brought up PSN vs XBL????

You claimed I bought it up and that is false. You're a filthy liar and there's nothing else to say about it. Damage control fail

Whoops yourself out of here.

You came in the thread trying to derail the thread with your damage control deflection argument of XBL, just pointing that fact out you were the one who initiated that exchange.

GOT ONE!

LMFAO...Ok I'll play...

Since you admit both PSN and XBL offer solid online service but claim Xbox offers "great 1st party MP" and Playstation offers "bad 1st party multiplayer"

(psst you should've stuck with the XBL narrative)

QUANTIFY YOUR ARGUMENT FOR US...

What are Xbox's "great 1st party multiplayer offerings" this gen?

Psst, what are you doing man? Don't you know the narrative has now changed to XBL?

I know we've used MP games to defend our better multiplayer system argument up til now, but you're not supposed to be talking about actual MP games now we'll get embarrassed, put those away...

...You're making us look bad.

Actually lemmings are the ones who tried to change the entire subject of this thread, maybe YOU should re-read the thread buddy.

When I showed the best multiplayer system based on best exclusive MP offerings, as lemmings have tried to argue this entire generation, now belongs to Nintendo and Switch with irrefutable proof backed by critical reviews and record breaking sales the lems spinning began.

Lems went into MAXIMUM damage control and tried to retreat to XBL and THAT is when Sony fans pointed out that XBL provides a minimal difference from PSN and thus the thread derail began.

Don't blame Zappat for something you desperate lemmings started. lol

LMAO...Gold!

And they are viciously trying to change the narrative about xbox being the better multiplayer system to, "We were only referring to live".

Seriously, how many times have you heard lemmings ATTACT Sony's AAA games saying, "I like gameplay not single player one and done movies. MS offers the best MP games and Sony doesn't have any that's why I'm an xbox fan"

They are ALL literally changing their own narrative that we've been hearing since XB1. Live being better than PSN was a PS3 vs 360 argument, however that argument wasn't lumped into their best multiplayer offerings argument which they used for GAMES, (AAA Halo, AAA Forza, AAA Gears)! ...When MS's MP offerings were actually All still AAA quality!

Live and best multiplayer platform are 2 SEPARATE arguments lems used and still used up til even this thread....

Sony says: "our players demand single player games"

https://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/sony-says-our-players-demand-single-player-games-33448575/?page=1

lol...

NOW they are trying to LIE about and pretend like the best multiplayer system argument only referred to XBL.....?

Then why are lemmings still referring to GAMES ^ here? NOT a single mention of XBL as the reason why MS offered the best multiplayer system??? Reference ^ link and posts above.

Why wheren't lemmings mentioning XBL's so called superior speed, better connection, less lag, chat ect. when talking about better multiplayer experience when trying to argue MS's superiority in MP? ALL you heard about was "bu but MS better MP games", HAHAHA.

Sony guys don't let these idiotic lemmings change the narrative once again, you guys know what Xbot fanboy best multiplayer narrative revolves around and now they've back tracked because I pulled their card on higher quality MP offerings and they can't argue superior MP games anymore.

Let's be clear, Sony typically release 2 major exclusives during the year.

The first games is released 1st half of the year and the other comes out right before the holiday rush.

Example:

God of War April

Spiderman September

With the success Sony has achieved with this formula there is no reason to expect them to change any time soon.

We already know Days Gone is Sony's first AAA of the year...that only leaves one other major exclusive to close the year out with. And what is the lesser of the remaining 3 AAA exclusive games Sony has in development?

That's, right Ghosts of Tsushima!

Sony is clearly more focused on launching PS5 than they are of outselling XboxDone in 2019....Sony skipping E3 is proof of that. They want to blow the doors off with their PS5 reveal...what better way than to launch PS5 day and date with TLOU2? And with their 2 major release approach, Death Stranding would be the holiday 2020 release.

It's likely Sony release PS5 in March - May 2020.

I don't think they can off on TLOU2 til holiday 2020, but I think that would be the best time to actually launch PS5.

Why are you poking at the helpless children of system wars?

For one they don't care about quality nor if they even get games as good at the multiplats we can play anywhere else.

If MS turns a profit, come hell, high water or destruction of the gaming industry all is well in vermin land.