I will never understand the parameters you use to value a game. I'm totally agree in saying that Arkham Origins is the carbon copy of Arkham City. However the game still provides a game experience at the top of the category. Every year you regularly reward games like Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed with high votes though those franchise are endless repetitions of the same. Preposterous, then, the 7,5 given to that chunk of shit know as Gears of War Judgment. Not flaming out... just thinking loud.
The day I'll can not buy used games anymore will be the day i stop totally to play videogames. In average I buy 10-15 used games for year and 3-4 new. I'm aware that companies get nothing from my purchases in the used world. BUT... i also take often dlc for my used games, so the companies get however some money and i'm glad to support them it this way. The moment they'll cut used games they'll lose totally me and much likely even a large share of public.
In my opinion the "6" identify: 1) a game that can be still played though its flaws; 2) a long anticipaded title that disappoints expectations; 3) a game suited for only a tranche of videogamers masses;
shindark's comments