I don't like Gamespot's review for this game, their negatives for the game really don't make sense to. They dock the game because it has similar gameplay to every other COD game? No way wonder why? Especially considering the multiplayer action which is of course the biggest appeal of the game is the same engine as COD4 you know the game of the year last year and the most popular game played on Live for the last year. So yeah not really seeing why that is a bad thing, basically its COD4 but in WW2 times with WW2 guns and gameplay but at the same time it has enough differences and additions to make it its own ie much better gore, new weapons, co-op campaign up to 4 players, and new perks.

So again to dock the game for being to similar to game of the year COD4 is lame to me and certainly not worth a 1.5 docking but thats a typical GS review now a days it seems.

As for this not COD5 nonsense, I get it doesn't say it in the title so understandably it shouldn't be called COD5 but the only reason I do so is Activision has said Infinity Ward is making the next COD game which they referred it to COD6, whether it will be or not I don't but til I see otherwise World at War=COD5 to me

check the gamespot link below for reference as to what I said
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6197777.html?tag=result;title;0