reachrocksman's forum posts

Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts
Why wear glasses when you can not wear glasses?OreoMilkshake
do you even read? Because the glassless version sucks.
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts
[QUOTE="SPBoss"][QUOTE="reachrocksman"]

I keep seeing people say "3d is a gimmick for games, bring glassless and I'll consider it"

While I agree that 3D is a gimmick, you guys HAVE to learn something important.

Glassless 3D is highly inferior to active shutter 3D.

1# - It has awful viewing angles. For cell hones, or portables such as 3DS, it is fine, but for tvs, it is just awful. It is a tech that is meant for small screens.

2# - Not as much depth as active shutter.

Why would you want an inferior 3D tech, just over wearing glasses? It boggles my mind.

Do your research properly, there is a glassless 3dtv in the making with high viewing angle, it also creates a 3d image out of any 2d input, current 3d tv's need an input of two channels one for each eye. These new glassless tv's will no doubt kill of current 3d tv's. Especially due to the fact that everything becomes 3d, even a still picture. This is obviously a bait thread

As if current 3dtvs dont create 3d with a 2d source. Dont try to correct me when you dont know what your talking about.
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts
[QUOTE="reachrocksman"]because there is little info on it?Wakanoid
Have you seen the gameplay? :@

yes.
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts
because there is little info on it?
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts

[QUOTE="reachrocksman"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] Not really.Danm_999
I know really, On average a 3dtv is $300 more than its 2d counterpart. Every makes them out like they cost thousands more.....

Current economic conditions don't exactly allow people to be that flippant about hundreds of dollars.

did I say they HAD to buy it? Also, if you really want to into 3d pricing, glassless costs WAY more than active shutter. So that argument is null also.

Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts
[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]What about the fact that 3D TVs costs a bajillion dollars?MFDOOM1983
Not really.

I know really, On average a 3dtv is $300 more than its 2d counterpart. Every makes them out like they cost thousands more.....
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts

I keep seeing people say "3d is a gimmick for games, bring glassless and I'll consider it"

While I agree that 3D is a gimmick, you guys HAVE to learn something important.

Glassless 3D is highly inferior to active shutter 3D.

1# - It has awful viewing angles. For cell hones, or portables such as 3DS, it is fine, but for tvs, it is just awful. It is a tech that is meant for small screens.

2# - Not as much depth as active shutter.

Why would you want an inferior 3D tech, just over wearing glasses? It boggles my mind.

Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts

not for me. i liked crysis core the best

max-Emadness

:? not sure if srs

Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts

[QUOTE="hippiesanta"][QUOTE="reachrocksman"]

Yes I am 21 and bi. There are great advantages to it.

Being with a woman advantages:

-smell of that perfume

-woman curves

-someone to talk about feelings to

.

Being with a guy advantages

-no drama, or high maintenance.

-better sex (for me this a a no contest)

-play video games after sex (lol its true)

-I have someone to work out with.

.

This is a great way to live life. You can have the best of both worlds. I love it living life this way.

However, of course that doesn't mean that this is the life, for all of you. I am just letting you know what its like being bi.

toast_burner

Any tips to be a BI?? or a Trendy Bi? unless it comes natural since birth....

I'm pretty sure it comes naturally.

Yes it comes naturally. Like when I was in gym class in High school I seen both the guys and girls sweating and it turned me on haha.
Avatar image for reachrocksman
reachrocksman

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 reachrocksman
Member since 2010 • 259 Posts

After doing the adblock plus + about:config tweaks, I tested it out compared to Chrome, and Firefox 4 is faster.

I did a test on each site I visit every day and Firefox 4 is faster on each one of them. I'm on a Mac if that matters.