I love WOW and i have no life to ruin, so i love the game. All games are like crack some you get bored of, WOW maybe take up all your gaming time so you won't buy games. The games is very well made.

You can't Find an MMO like this on a console. So if you don't like it it's understandable, the game needs alot of your time and is to hard for 2 year olds.

[QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="manningbowl135"]

It's not just the offense, which is a valid point. Execution is the most important part, but you can't even get to that if you don't even know how to run each play. As a rookie, it takes you a lot longer to learn a NFL playbook than a vet, so they sit for awhile until they have it down.

After that is the part where you throw him out there too soon. The guy is out of College, most times playing in a good team, so not used to a pass rush. He comes in and if you throw him to the wolves, he'll get hit 10 times harder and 10 times more than he did in college. He'll have 1/10th the time he had in college. All that contributes to a young guy losing confidence. He'll get flustered in the pocket easily in his career, throw off his back foot, throw it too soon. Stuff like that. That's what happened to Carr and Couch.

This approach worked well with Palmer and Pennington. For some QBs, it does, for some it doesn't. There's no right way and there's no what if b/c you only get one shot. That's why QBs are the riskiest position in football. There's just as many if not more 1st round QB busts as there are booms.

PS: Also when you start a rookie from day 1, you're effectively telling the vets that you've given up on the season before it even began. You simply can't run a team that way.

manningbowl135

1) Roethlisberger is an anamoly. Most starting QBs are horrible in their rookie season. Starting them usually means you're giving up on the season and focusing on the future.

What I'm saying is there's no right way to tell what's the better way. You just said starting Peyton was the best way to develop him. I can't argue that b/c well..look how he turned out and I don't know how he would turn out if he sat. But you can look at it from the other side. Palmer, he sat and later became one of the best QBs in the league. If the Bengals had to do it again, would they start Palmer immediately? Should they? The sitting method resulted in the complete turnaround of their franchise and just like the Peyton situation, you can't say starting him would've been better b/c you don't know.

My point: Both methods have success and failure stories. There's no way to tell which one is the best way for a QB.

It's not just the offense, which is a valid point. Execution is the most important part, but you can't even get to that if you don't even know how to run each play. As a rookie, it takes you a lot longer to learn a NFL playbook than a vet, so they sit for awhile until they have it down.

After that is the part where you throw him out there too soon. The guy is out of College, most times playing in a good team, so not used to a pass rush. He comes in and if you throw him to the wolves, he'll get hit 10 times harder and 10 times more than he did in college. He'll have 1/10th the time he had in college. All that contributes to a young guy losing confidence. He'll get flustered in the pocket easily in his career, throw off his back foot, throw it too soon. Stuff like that. That's what happened to Carr and Couch.

This approach worked well with Palmer and Pennington. For some QBs, it does, for some it doesn't. There's no right way and there's no what if b/c you only get one shot. That's why QBs are the riskiest position in football. There's just as many if not more 1st round QB busts as there are booms.

PS: Also when you start a rookie from day 1, you're effectively telling the vets that you've given up on the season before it even began. You simply can't run a team that way.

manningbowl135

Rather have a rookie QB sit and learn. McNair did that years ago with the Titans(might been Oilers when he came in I forget)and was a good QB for them for that. Some are good enough mentally and physically(increased games from college with stronger opposition)to handle it, most are not. Rather see a QB watch for a year, with some can come in midway to end of season to get the reps. Russells time should be now. Quinns time is not as Anderson is doing a fine job as the starter.mrgab

[QUOTE="-Halftime-"]

I agree with you man. I hate when people are trying to make this a race issue.

Sean Taylor made some bad decisions in his life, definitely, but that doesn't mean he was a bad guy or a "thug". Simply an immature kid that did some stupid things at the time. The man was killed in his own home, protecting his girl & his daughter. Not in some strip club or on a street corner. This "Hung out with the wrong crowd" thing can go out the window till we actually know if the man that killed Sean was an aquaintance of his, because that accusation has no weight at this point.

WhoShotMe

Exactly.

I was actually surprised Sean lived in Miami cause he players for Washington what does that tell you? His sister still hung out with the wrong crowd? And until last year he was hanging with the same people. I feel bad for Sean but i feel worse for The younger generation because they seem to be heading in the wrong direction. acting like gansgters robbing people for no reason these losers need to find a job.

Sadly if was a football player and my sister threw big partys and invite people from the hood she hardly knew in my house, i think she would fall into the wrong crowd. Sometimes even siblings can be the wrong crown(MIchael Vick is going to jail with his uncle)I Would make sure my sister did he bzness in her house not mine. So you might think Family doesn't fall under wrong crowd but it does.

I have to disagree with the whole "give them time to learn the offense" knowing the offense on paper means nothing on the field if you can't execute. Bill Parcels was desperate last year with Bledsoe and put in Tony Romo after saying earlier in the year he didn't feel confident in him. What my point is these Qb's best time to play football is by playing, sitting Jamarcus Russel and Brady Quin is Idiotic. If you don't have a solid QB and drafted a Rookie QB start him and go game to game. Ben Rothlisberger lead his team to the Playoffs his first 2 years in the league. If Jamarcus and Brady are your future you need to start them in week 1 cause next year don't hold your breath cause they still have to learn to avoid a Pass Rush and throw inbetween windows, something they won't learn this year.

Why take 2 years to do something you can do in 1? Oaklands not making the playoffs Even though Clevlands doing good whos to say if they started Brady in week 1 they might have been a better team. Look what Rothlisberger did when Maddox got injured in his first year.

A reviewer should never, NEVER be let go because of a review. Sure, I hated Jeff after the whole Twilight Princess thing, but after beating the game, I, along with many, realized his review was accurate. Jeff was probably the best reviewer on Gamespot, and he wasn't afraid to give a game what it deserved. So now what are we supposed to believe? After this whole thing, I've realized that many game's reviews most likely aren't actually what the reviewer thinks; there could be so much more to it, such as the advertising on this site and paying for higher reviews.

And Eidos:

I will NEVER, ever buy a single game from you again. How about instead of crying about how bad your game suks, you could *gasp* make a good game? I know, crazy, isn't it? You're company will never be respected from many people now, including me.

Fick1122