is it repetitive ? Yes but not boring ...is it difficult ? yes but still enjoyable. actually ,it's not that bad ,the graphic and design of environment and characters are really good ,my opinion : the developers only focused on pure action and they almost succeeded . 7 of 10, no more and no less.

giving the player all of the super powers known by mankind,jumping higher than a skyscraper,running faster than a bullet,freezing,firing,telekineses,stomping ,running up the walls and etc...NOT necessarily make a better game.and taking all of them from the player(in most of main quests) is even worse ! in my opinion "this game is a mess" it's not better than the previous one in any aspects(other than the graphic).5 or 6 of 10 at the most.

it's not a game,it's a piece of art.

Couldn't be better ,10 of 10.

@atsra If (as you mentioned) "a game is able to touch you, to make you laugh, or cry, or fear, then it's a good game, regardless of anything else? " no ,it's not a good game necessarily ,i don't mean to say gone home is bad ,it has good story and atmosphere and etc ,but not a good game ! a good game, first of all needs a challenging game play .a good book or a good movie is not a good game either.this one is a good exploring something ... and that's why some players don't like this kind of genre because the lack of challenge. i hope i made my point by my poor English writing.

I don't care how open it is,i'm just dying to play it,that's all.

for those who didn't play it yet,believe me ,this game is much better than it looks.

at first it maybe seems boring or complicated , but it will be so entertaining then... my opinion 7.5 of 10 is fair.

@vannacut you should set your desktop resolution to 1080 and the game runs at the same res.

It's one of a few games which GS gave it a proper score , luckily its name is "metro" and not "resident evil",otherwise the GS editors may gave it an awful score too!