@tman08: Siege sucks with M/K on console because it's 30 fps. So no real advantage there. I doubt many developers will choose to enable this for their multiplayer titles, anyway. Personally, I want this for single player campaings for those game swhich areunavailable on PC.

I still have it on my PS4, it was a really cool experience back then and definitely worthy of preservation. I'm glad this person waited this long to show it to the public (nearly complete), so even if they shut him down, it's already in the wild. Mission acomplished, IMO.

@ice12tray: Yeah, pretty much the same thing. I just immediatelly thought of how hypocritical this was when I saw the headline.

I'd love it if they fixed it. It's a huge game (collectioN) with tons of content, marred with inaccessibility of the multiplayer.

@JEF8484: I love both but 4 definitely made more of an impact. 5 felt more like a streamlined expansion (though still fantastic and in many ways better).

Best GTA car phsyics in the entire series. So sad they neutered them for 5.

No. The game has far more serious problems on console (for me) than content. I'm never, *ever* playing a sub 60 fps game of this sort again. It's just pure garbage.

@horizonwriter: My hope is that the swan song will be some game we haven't even heard of.

@Warlord_Irochi: Well... do you doubt there'll be a successor to PS4? Pretty safe statement to make ("PS5 is real").

@Vodoo: Well, to be fair, you can play your old Xbox OG, 360 and regular One games on the X. Maybe not all, but they're working on it. So the comparison is unfari to Xbox on this point. But yeah, even as a collector, i'd rather the convenience of playing on one machine, be it phsyical games or digital.