@i_p_daily: Bro...I upvoted you just because I knew you were going to say something xD
I couldn't help myself. The troll came out (talking about myself) lol
But real talk, I want to know how fast PS5 games are going to load. I already know Series X versions of games are going to look a tad bit better but I want some comparisons. I think the first is going to be Cold War. I can see DF all over that one.
@gifford38: I'll get one for the sequel to Doom Eternal and maybe Halo if there's a big difference between the XB1 and Series X versions but those are the only games in the MS stable I really want and unfortunately, I won't be able to play Doom with PS controller now :(
@gifford38: Isn't it funny how the guy @deviltaz35 who is accusing someone of misleading others is trying to mislead others lol Isn't that some bull****?
@deviltaz35: It's over 2x as fast...so how is that misleading? Also, the PS5 comes with a game. Speaking of games, that's why Sony can charge what they charge. They offer excellent game experiences. They've been doing that for 4 generations straight with very little slow down. Furthermore, if you don't have an additional $100 to get the version with the disc drive, you can always save $100 and go digital. At least you get the same power instead of buying some extremely under powered piece of junk that'll show it's limits in about 2 years.
If they want to compete, they have o at this point and a monthly plan was a great idea along with pricing the S that low but there's a problem... Though the S has the CPU but it's lacking tremendously everywhere else. Ram, GPU, like how poorly will high end exclusives run on it? Also, you're more with the payment plan so there's interest there. If you can't afford to pay $300-$600 outright then you shouldn't be buying a console at this time. I wonder how Rent-A-Center feels about this lol
LouiXIII's comments