Enough of this fanboy bait. Wanna see a huge difference in visuals and performance? Compare console version to PC version. Enough is enough already with this barely noticable garbage.
ID tried to hide a mediocre game behind 60fps and pretty graphics. I redboxed it and for the final three hours I kept thing "Thank God I didn't buy this". The most disapointing game of the year deserves to flop.
[QUOTE="drinkerofjuice"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"] They are pegged down for not being credible, like X-Play, IGN, Game Informer, etc.Giant_Panda
Sometimes I wonder if gaming journalism is in the state it's in partially because gamers can't distinguish the good publications from the bad. :P
Exactly. Why on earth anyone listens to IGN, X-play or EDGE is beyond me.
Whats really beyond me is how gamers don't even look to their own when judging a game. A title can have a whooping 40 reviews from 40 random "reviewers" and that will determine a failure or a success. Despite user reviews that may damn near triple the "professional" ones, from people who more than likely put more time into the game than the so-called pros. Funny, yet sad.
This would be great news if I was 10 years younger.
bonesawisready5
I don't understand why, do you think you would've appreciated it more in your youth or did you care more about scores and how they effect public reaction in the media in your youth?
As a child I would tolerate playing a little guy in a little green hat swinging his little sword. Not so much now a days. I have no issue with the children that this game is targeting. I'm just apart of the high population of adults who have not cared about the name Zelda in well over a decade. Review scores are cool for little fanboy wars, but lets be real. We already know what game will be crowned GOTY by the gaming community. The millions who buy the title in the first week combined with the millions that will be playing online is a much more credible indicator of GOTY than random magazine and website employees.
They don't beta test because they're on an 2 year cycle and don't have time, they don't talk about the engine because it sucks, and the only reason they feel the need to adress the claims of "cut and paste" are because they're true.
DarkLink77
So when did you play MW3? Or are we playing the "talk out our behind" game????
They don't beta test because they're on an 2 year cycle and don't have time, they don't talk about the engine because it sucks, and the only reason they feel the need to adress the claims of "cut and paste" are because they're true.
eboyishere
Also if they would have beta test sales would have went down.
Its a known fact that CoD games release in a poor state. This has been happening since CoD 2 which was damn near unplayable on the 360 for weeks. What is a beta going to do besides inform people of the obvious? BO had another poor launch and is the highest selling installment. A broken beta will not have decreased sales at all.
I fail to see why people put Halo and CoD in the same sentence. CoD wipes the floor with Halo in every way imaginable. Theres a reason CoD is the best selling Xbox title after Halo had a much bigger fan-support headstart. Reach sealed deal for me. The outdated gameplay, outdated visuals, and bland enemies showed that Halo is not in CoDs league.
soulitane
I find it kind of funny you use outdated visuals as a deterrent against halo when in comparison to CoD :P
I fail to see whats so funny considering CoD looks extremely better while running at a higher fps. Never implied it was a visual powerhouse, but compared to Halo, it vastly superior.
Log in to comment