balfe1990's forum posts

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@balfe1990 said:

@charizard1605 said:

no Windows Phone (although that might change soon)

If you're in the market for a premium device, I'd recommend this bad boy; arguably the perfect WP.

Or even drop 70(or less, as is often the case) quid on a Nokia Lumia 520 and get the same basic experience as the high end handsets.

I'm actually looking at this promotion Microsoft has going where you can switch out a Galaxy S2 for a Lumia 1080 I think for free. I just don't know if Lumia 1080 is even provided on my carrier is all.

The 1020? With the 41MP shooter? Pretty elusive in the States, or so I hear. Nokia do stupid carrier exclusives which really limits their exposure. Ridiculous if you ask me, WP needs every bit of attention it can grab.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

no Windows Phone (although that might change soon)

If you're in the market for a premium device, I'd recommend this bad boy; arguably the perfect WP.

Or even drop 70(or less, as is often the case) quid on a Nokia Lumia 520 and get the same basic experience as the high end handsets.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

The reality is that no one will want to buy the XBox business because it will need to make way for the Steambox, anyway. Perhaps Valve would buy it up just to have it out of the way?

No way they'd have the capital for that. Not a chance.

And I can't really see the Steambox lineup hitting the ground running.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

That's the thing, Bing is incredibly prolific and massively important to Microsoft's overall strategy- it may be a loss leader now, just like Xbox (which still nevertheless does well for them, and is their most visible brand), or Windows Phone (which, it needs to be pointed out, has overtaken iOS in most markets outside of the US), but it is an important pillar and it is going nowhere.

Yeah, I believe it also powers Yahoo searches now. Ever since Mayer took over, they just seem to outsource every facet of their business to those more established.

That whole Windows Phone stat comes with some caveats though; namely it's emerging in obscure markets where the iPhone would never have taken off anyway(also because Apple has essentially abandoned those markets, if they ever really had any intention of becoming a powerhouse there in the first place). It's booming in India and the Philippines though, which is great.

Though it won't be approaching Android numbers or even iOS anytime soon. I wish it would, it's a fantastic platform.

@cainetao11

All good man, I'm prone to the odd fart of the brain myself.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@balfe1990: please tell me you're not serious. PS4 doesn't cost $200 to produce? Here: PlayStation 4 to sell at a loss, but Sony expects profit ...

news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-57603901-235/playstation-4-to... Cached

PlayStation 4 to sell at a loss, but Sony expects profit. The company says that it'll be able to make up the loss by generating revenue off PlayStation ..." if it sells at a loss, how much does it cost to make?

Bro, I was referring to his figure of 1000 Euro, not 399.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@balfe1990 said:

@charizard1605 said:

all iOS devices use Bing now

What?

Default search engine in all iOS devices now is Bing.

Huh. Didn't know that, they've obviously been quiet on the matter.

Lesser of two evils for them I suppose.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@StormyJoe said:

@balfe1990 said:

@StormyJoe said:

PS4 would be a $1000.

No.

Snappy response. Look, if the PS3 had sold like the PS2 did at $600, you think it would have come down in price? You really think Sony would have "learned" anything and not charged at least $600 (probably more) for the PS4?

Please.

Why would they charge 1000 Euro? Sony is not staffed by moronic apes. The Xbox isn't the sole reason they charge 399 for the PS4. There's a plethora of other factors at play. The console doesn't even cost half that to produce.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

all iOS devices use Bing now

What?

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@StormyJoe said:

PS4 would be a $1000.

No.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

@Animal-Mother said:

@balfe1990 said:

In reality, they should.

Microsofts problem these days is the amount of pies they have fingers in. Too many pies, not enough fingers. They're trying to branch out in a million different directions. Couple this with the in-fighting between the various fractured departments, and you just end up with a mess. Autocratic leaders doing whatever they want doesn't help either.

They've lost their focus. In the last ten years, they catch onto trends too late in the day, or if they come too early, they don't seize the opportunity and market and let it stagnate until someone competent comes along and plugs the gap. In the last decade - 15 years, Microsoft has come to each endeavor SECOND or THIRD, and it's already too crowded by then.

Ballmer was jaded and outmatched by opposing leadership. Nadella looks like he could apply some direction to the company. I wouldn't say he is averse to the idea of flogging the Xbox brand. It would probably be better for all involved.

But who the hell would buy it?

Yeah that's the big question, Less competition is obviously detrimental to the industry. But IF ( it seems like a pretty big if now) who would buy it?

Nobody, realistically.

Who would want that burden weighing on their bottom line? Apple has always done their own thing and clearly has different ideas of how entertainment should play out in the living room. And they, aside from Google and maybe even Yahoo, are the only ones that could actually weather that financial impact.

End of the day, nobody is going to buy the brand during it's current cycle. Any offers would have to come after the Xbox One, and then I'd say the industry would have moved on. The Xbox brand is probably something MS has to bear until they inevitably wind it down and focus on Xbox Music and Xbox Video etc. as the continuation of the name