Well, the PC version is the best yet it score only 9.3 compared to the 9.5 of the PS3 and 9.6 of the 360 version so I don't see why the OP is whining about anything. ;)
[QUOTE="buuzer0"]HAHAHAHA, Duke Nukem Forever. :lol: No matter if the game ever comes out, it will never justify the 10 years of development. I loved Duke 3d on PC back in the day though, multiplayer was insane. 10 years of total wait, but the development of the latest build is like 3-4 years.
I know Scott Miller. I'm friends with his son. Duke Nukem Forever will go multi-platform and be released at the end of this year.
Â
You can quote me on that.Â
TheOneMan
Quoting you on it.
Man, there's a better chance of Halo 3 coming out for the Wii than Duke Nukem Forever coming out at all.kholdstare61
You're logic sucks, OP. People do buy systems for their exclusives, but if the game is on other systems, then more people might get them. I would not buy a PS3 for one game. Anyone who buys a system for just one game is well, not too bright. If you have access to the game on another system, and you have more games you want for it, then it's win for the consumer, win for the developer, and only loss for the guy who made the system.
I don't believe in taking points away from high requirements. I played many games on unsupported hardware and on the lowest settings with chugging FPS and still LOVED the games. I loved CoD2 while I had to run in at low settings and 25FPS. Same goes for HL2, FEAR, Oblivion. Sure I've upgraded since then but still, system doesn't matter. I can look past requirements.
Log in to comment