[QUOTE="Yongying"]People like you piss me off, instead of supporting the interests of consumers (you), you side with the interests of multimillion dollar companies. :|[QUOTE="daqua_99"]
No, my point is that people should pay for what they use. We do so for every other commodity (electricity, water, fuel, etc), why not for internet bandwidth? Why should someone who uses 25GB pay the same as someone who uses 250GB of downloads?
Tylendal
why? the hell i don't know why, you probably wouldn't even care if electricity, water and fuel rose 200% in price.
I think he's just a little ticked with people's sense of entitlement. Problem is, internet downloads aren't a limited commodity. Granted, it costs a company more to provide faster internet service, but as for the download limit? That has no effect on the companies costs. In short, I think daqua_99 is trying to get at a noble point, and he would be right, IF it weren't for the fact that passing the download cap won't cost the company a cent.Right, he can be mad all he wants, people should feel entitled to keep things the way they are, it seems like he is getting screwed over in Australia along with the rest of Aussies, he should blame himself and his own for their lack of action against the companies that are scewing them over.They pay 100$ for a video game, next he'll be asking why the rest of the world doesn't pay that much...
Log in to comment