Yongying's forum posts

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

guys, i saw the other day this samsung

It looked really awsome compared to the other tv's that i saw, is this tv worth it mainly for gaming on PS3 and pc, watching a couple bluerays, won't be using 3D alot i think. Also what is the difference between this model and the UE40D8000?

Another question, the guy at the store said he prefered the Panasonic txp50vt30, i asked him why, and he said becuase its more vibrant. I looked back and forth between the two and felt that the samsung was more crisp, i don't know! am i hearing visions or something lol?? i'm looking for 40" to 42", thanks!

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="kev_stevens67"]

Look at the big picture - just because he is handcuffed - DOES NOT mean he is no longer a threat :lol:

A police office still has to be careful.

kev_stevens67

I think you should look at the big picture, the cop should have stayed with the cuffed man in the car instead of dealing with the woman :roll:

Way to not address what I said :roll:

The man was still a potential threat

You're not only missing the big picture, you're looking the other way.

The guy wouldn't be a threat if the cop stayed in the car with him, that is the big picture i addressed you on.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="kev_stevens67"]

I am pretty sure Video taping a police officer is against the law. I'll have to see if I can look this up later. If it is against the law, then the police have every right to tell her to go inside the house and turn off the camera. I would also laugh at the person who was video taping who said "I'm video taping..it is my right" :lol:

I could be wrong though.

Edit: Another good point someone else made, was the police have every right to tell her to go inside for her own safety. What if the criminal had a gun, they didn't find yet and then started shooting. It would be for the citizens best interest to be inside..not outside. Just a thought.

kev_stevens67

What? the cop feels threatened by the girl, tells her to go inside for her own safety because the handcuffed man might shoot her? lol

Look at the big picture - just because he is handcuffed - DOES NOT mean he is no longer a threat :lol:

A police office still has to be careful.

I think you should look at the big picture, the cop should have stayed with the cuffed man in the car instead of dealing with the woman :roll:

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

I am pretty sure Video taping a police officer is against the law. I'll have to see if I can look this up later. If it is against the law, then the police have every right to tell her to go inside the house and turn off the camera. I would also laugh at the person who was video taping who said "I'm video taping..it is my right" :lol:

I could be wrong though.

Edit: Another good point someone else made, was the police have every right to tell her to go inside for her own safety. What if the criminal had a gun, they didn't find yet and then started shooting. It would be for the citizens best interest to be inside..not outside. Just a thought.

kev_stevens67

What? the cop feels threatened by the girl, tells her to go inside for her own safety because the handcuffed man might shoot her? lol

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Anyone....particularly an interested individual...can become a threat. They didn't want to take that risk and asked her to go inside. Not a big deal until she made it one.LJS9502_basic

Your making the assumption about them making the assumption that she could be a possible threat, awsome reasoning right there folks.

No. The cop said it. He said he didn't feel safe with her behind him. More than once in fact. Therefore, it's NOT assumption.;)

The cop did not feel threatened by the chick until he noticed the camera, and pulled a dick move by saying, that she is "anti police for what she said prior to recording". The cop is a liar, and you assume he is telling the truth by saying that he felt threatend by a girl, which is obviously BS.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No I'm not making assumptions. I'm going by what was said on the tape. You have edited in other reasons than those stated. They didn't arrest other people because they hadn't done anything wrong. Again...who is the potential threat...the friend of someone arrested or a stranger? She identified herself as a friend and thus put herself in a different category than uninterested bystander.LJS9502_basic

She wasn't doing anything wrong, how was she a threat?

Anyone....particularly an interested individual...can become a threat. They didn't want to take that risk and asked her to go inside. Not a big deal until she made it one.

Your making the assumption about them making the assumption that she could be a possible threat, awsome reasoning right there folks.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You are making assumptions as to his reasons though....you don't know that.LJS9502_basic

You are making assumptions and didn't answer my question.

No I'm not making assumptions. I'm going by what was said on the tape. You have edited in other reasons than those stated. They didn't arrest other people because they hadn't done anything wrong. Again...who is the potential threat...the friend of someone arrested or a stranger? She identified herself as a friend and thus put herself in a different category than uninterested bystander.

She wasn't doing anything wrong, how was she a threat?

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Which right was that?LJS9502_basic

The right to film a public servant, i'm not going to play stupid with you LJ but if you honestly think that they felt threatened by her (which i'm sure you don't) then what can i say, you shouldn't be defending cowardly cops.

Ah but again she wasn't arrested for that. Cops don't like to let situations get out of hand. They need control. She presented a possible problem. They asked her to leave. She did not. Whether you wish to agree with her arrest or not...it was lawful.

The police officer felt threatened by the camera, and has a quilty consious and got nervous, why wouldn't they arrest the rest of the people that were present, you know the ones at the end of the videos who were being called to testify what they saw? ah?

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] Then shouldn't have been upset when the cop arrested her. LJS9502_basic

She was upset because her rights were being unlawfully violated by the very same people who swore to uphold them. If you don't stand up to your rights then you might aswell live in China.

Which right was that?

The right to film a public servant, i'm not going to play stupid with you LJ but if you honestly think that they felt threatened by her (which i'm sure you don't) then what can i say, you shouldn't be defending cowardly cops.