WhiteKnight77's forum posts

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

Is there any proof that Sessions was talking about the campaign with them. Also there is this. :O

So says a Senator on the same committee that Sessions was on. Pot meet kettle.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@Jacanuk said:
@drunk_pi said:
@darklight4 said:

@drunk_pi: Are you mentally challenged, this has nothing to do with the fucking government or left or right. My comment was about how the media forces a narrative on various stories. How often in a police shooting involving a black individual do the media turn it into a race war instead of giving people the facts they play with emotions just for views/clicks. The hit pieces on Pewdiepie is another example. The innumerable times they have a one sided interview where the opposition can't defend themselves. The media sucks and until they clean up their act people are going to distrust them even more.

Once again this has nothing to do with politicians, Trump or any other fantasy you conjure up this is simply the media being shit. If I have to explain this one more time you truly are lost cause.

How does the media force a narrative on various stories? The whole point of the news is to offer a story of something happening either locally, nationally, and/or globally. Yes there will be a bias and yes some stories are over-reported and others are under-reported.

As for police shootings of black individuals, sometimes the media does paint a broad brush and other times, the media tends to paint the narrative that crime is being committed by minorities. It's a two way street. That being said, if a police officer shoots someone and the circumstances are murky, of course there is going to be outrage considering how the police have treated minorities since Jim Crow. It's something has been ongoing in American history but the only difference is that it's being reported more often. Should the media not cover it and ignore potential abuse from police departments? In fact, it doesn't necessarily have to be about the police, it can be about anyone and anything.

I'll agree that the media has its issues but to suggest that suppression of the media is a good thing or that the media is somehow conjuring falsehoods is ridiculous.

How? the media forces a narrative when they decide what to bring. A lot of times without fact checking or even caring about what is the truth or going with what is the "truth" at the moment. Google wrongful media accusations , and see how many times someone can be accused of something and then it winds up completely untrue. And some accusations will never go away no matter how untrue they are and the media does not give a frag and hides behind the 1st. amendment.

And again how is it supression when all that happened was they did not get a invite to a casual meeting.

Either you need to look up suppression or just realize that you are running of because it´s Trump and nothing else.

*cough* NBC and George Zimmerman *cough*

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@MrGeezer said:
@WhiteKnight77 said:

So one group of people can have free speech and free expression, but the other group cannot? That is what is happening. One group just does not want to hear anything that does not conform to their mindset and are doing everything they can to stop another. They are using their rights to trample on the very same rights that they are using and people say it is OK to do so. You cannot use your rights to infringe upon the rights of others. What they are doing is totalitarianism. They want people to be subservient to them and their ideas.

We can say the same about that group, they need to learn that they will hear, read and see things that they do not want to hear and quit living in a bubble.

Except that I still have yet to hear exactly how one group's rights are being trampled on. If you can complain about how you think that something is racist, that doesn't carry the condition that "but that's only okay if you don't use the internet, since the internet makes it too easy to get people to support your cause."

Again, at no point have anyone's rights to free speech and free expression been infringed upon. If someone CHOOSES to pull a product because they think that social pressure will cause people to stop paying money, then that is not an example of someone's rights being trampled on.

I am not necessarily referring to the t-shirt. Look back about a month and what happened at Berkely? Idiots tore up a college campus building due to not wanting someone to speak there even though there were people who wanted to hear him speak.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@skipper847 said:

@WhiteKnight77: Expensive that for me I live in UK lol.

OK, try a Tesco. There should be stores that sell footwear that have something similar to check your feet with and in UK sizes. Shoes that fit properly are a boon for your feet. As far as buying clothes online, I do, but what I often do is go to a store such as the Oakley Outlet at an outlet mall shop and try the clothes that I am interested on to ensure I buy the right size. Then after buying just one at the outlet store, I can go online and buy direct from them or even Amazon.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@skipper847 said:

They should make a VR app where it measures you to that exact inch and chooses best size to your search. I no too far fetch at this time as other accessories would be needed to take your measurements but some time in future would be possible.

Go to Wal-Mart and use the device used to measure foot size. It should just touch the sides and big toe.

Instructions & Fitting Tips

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts
@kittennose said:

@WhiteKnight77: So your argument is that adult supervision doesn't prevent teen drinking because adults are in fact the source based on your own observation. So based on your experiences we need a law to stop young adults from drinking when similar laws failed to stop you?

I am for a law that help reduce the number of teens that kill themselves due to such, just as I stated originally.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@kittennose said:

@WhiteKnight77: Is it your position that supervised teenagers are no less likely to drink then unsupervised teenagers? If not, I am unsure why your comments are directed at me.

Yes, exactly. Even with parents at home, teens will drink, I know, I did. It still happens to this day. While laws will not prevent all teens from getting alcohol, it does help deter many from getting it.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@kittennose said:

@WhiteKnight77:Didn't claim that living at home eliminated it, just claimed that adult supervision is the only thing in the equation that actually prevents teenage drinking.

Where did I say that parental supervision did or didn't eliminate it. I stated that living at home with adult supervision will not prevent teenage drinking.

Living at home with a parent or parents does not prevent teenage drinking. Where do you think most kids get their alcohol from?

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

I'm wondering why the church even has a say in this at all; is this not a matter for whatever country the crime occurs in?

Or is this an issue because it occurs at the Vatican which is sort of it's own sovereign city-state?

Honestly, I can't answer why the church is allowed to handle such cases instead of criminal courts where the should be. I don't care if the church does not want bad publicity, they have earned it for sweeping such under the rig for so long and letting it happen time and again with the same priests.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

38

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@MrGeezer said:
@WhiteKnight77 said:

I remember 5 digit phone numbers and if you wanted a private line, you paid extra.

I have no problem with people communicating stuff we may not like, unfortunately, there are way to many people that want people to stop saying stuff that they do not like. We see that a lot lately be it a once employed assistant journalism professor trying to stop the student press from covering something to protests over a speaker at a campus. Certain groups are not wanting people to say certain things and these people are calling a different group fascist yet are the ones denying people the ability to speak or say what they want and yell over the top of them. It is sad really.

Suck as it may, we'd better start getting used to it. The fact is that me wanting someone to stop saying something that I don't like, and using social pressure to try to get that person to stop saying it, is almost always protected free speech. That's just how things are now. And there's no "solution" beyond REALLY trampling over people's free expression.

If we want free expression, this is what comes with it.

So one group of people can have free speech and free expression, but the other group cannot? That is what is happening. One group just does not want to hear anything that does not conform to their mindset and are doing everything they can to stop another. They are using their rights to trample on the very same rights that they are using and people say it is OK to do so. You cannot use your rights to infringe upon the rights of others. What they are doing is totalitarianism. They want people to be subservient to them and their ideas.

We can say the same about that group, they need to learn that they will hear, read and see things that they do not want to hear and quit living in a bubble.