Great show gotta say though that if and only if someone came forward to that million dollar challenge and proved their skills I am quite confident that person would to 90% certainty not be made public and all information gathered willing and unwillingly from the person or later the so called subject would not be made public. This in mind with the panic it all could start and affect our way of life and also with the some of the to me horrible experiments that has been done on the civilian population like the the MK-ULTRA program done during 1953-1964 and was approved by the goverment to test LSD on the civilian population because they feared the russians and chinese were using this drug to turn americans and they did not want to fall behind on the subject. Also another which I dont remember the name of where a college was targeted and students were druged and some raped to see the psychological on the one's who were targeted. These and many more, and yes these are the only one's that have gone public and become known.
I dont understand how people can write the dislike on PS4 is not making the eye camera mandatory and lack of these kind of games. The lack of games I can understand but not making it mandatory is not even a dislike for me especially since for the Xbox one it is not even integrated into the xbox one but is a whole separate box of hardware the PS4 can just as easily in the future make something similar and then make it a choice to buy it or not instead of forcing it onto you and demanding an extra 100$.
Also yeah while some people might say the money difference is not that big of a deal. The price for Xbox one is 100$ more + 60$ for a 1 year sub (which you are pretty much forced to take) + any gaming cost. While PS4 is 100$ less + no forced sub but it is for 50$ + any gaming cost. That means if the Xbox one lives for let's say 5 years you will have to pay 30$ more every year compared to the PS4 if you take the PS4 sub. If not you will save 80$ each year compared to the Xbox one. Even so with the 30$ per year in a 5 year period that means the PS4 + 3 games new games with sub = Xbox one with sub.
I am still undecided and seeing as the xbox is not even released in Sweden yet, and here the price difference between an Xbox one and a PS4 is 150$ for the consoles and 14$ more on the Xbox sub for me a 5 year period difference would be 44$ per year or without sub 110$ per year.
So from a complete money looking perspective the PS4 is the way to go. But I've decided to wait to see what the next years gaming line up is for both of the consoles my Xbox 360 is still great to me.
@kpolicoff But they have barely released any great games in a year after release atleast not great exclusive titles and to be honest next years line up compared to the other consoles is really really weak. Also as I've already said multiple times alot of people still dont know Wii U is a new console but actually think it's just an upgraded and overpriced new controller.
The biggest issue I could see with the Wii U at launch and still is this simple fact.
2 weeks before it's launch I had no idea it was even coming out a friend told me about it. I asked a girl I know last week if she was getting the new super mario seeing as she has every single game from that serie and she said yes I am, so I just said oh so you have a Wii U? No I dont what is that? It's the new nintendo game console that came out this time last year. What? I thought that was only a normal Wii with a control with a screen on it.
I mean the coverage on Wii U has been terrible in Sweden before it's release and even after it's release there has not been a single commercial on the tv or almost anywhere that has shown the Wii U.
I mean it's bad when people dont even know a new console is out or the difference between a Wii and a Wii U.
Cant really see how Xbox One even has a chance to outsell PS4 in europe seeing as the PS4 is already out here while the Xbox One will be made available stometime early next year. So why would people buy alot of consoles that are not even out yet compared to one that is?
While I agree the scorn/hate on COD lately has been a bit over the top and I do like this show to see the comments on the site. I did find your comment in the show "If I were to play the devils advocate on this" you say that the game is mainly reviewed as a multiplayer game the review in itself has about 50/50 on single/multiplayer on the other hand 2 out of 3 positive things about the game is from the single or now coop campaign and the only negative is a weak story. This still warrants the game the usual 8+ score. At the same time Medal of Honor: Warfighter which was released oct last year was shot down and given a 6/10 because of it's weak story and cliché campaign while still same as Call of Duty from what I understand is a mainly multiplayer focused game aswell.
Tobajas' comments