In all honesty, the FTP factor is what deduced 4 points from it. Wayy to much pay-to win and underdeveloped coop sequences. Underdeveloped as in "little stages" and "too short"
@aiat_gamer Well, Kevin is usually way too harsh on those matters, his reviews' tend to be neutral and usually tell you if it's a buy for you or not, but his scores are usually low with no apparent reason.
@Hurvl Nah, you pretty much got it. Besides, it looks outside of place whitin a game like Valhalla Knights, such thig is expected from Agarest War for example, or even Catherine, it's part of the whole setting.
Besides, fanservice in a bad game is the worst thing to happen, because it seems they KNEW it was bad and tried to win over the gamers with boobies instead. *cough cough* ONECHAMBARA *cough cough*
@uprentiss When you learn to speak how a common human instead of a retarded infant who just learned how to swear, come back and we'll talk, until there play your GTA all you want.
@Exit_Limbo Except for that lego game, i'd rather to play any one from that list rather than GTA itself. Don't take me wrong, not saying the game is crap, but GTA is a sandbox and nothing more, they can improve it's looks (actually, some of the details i've seen impressed me), but i find it hard to have any fun with GTA except the very open-world scenario.
Besides, Sleeping Dogs and Just Cause as an GTA clone? You haven't really played them, do you?
Raxyman's comments