MetalMan300's comments

  • 16 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

@ FrakMaster. Really? I completely disagree. Gears of War was created with the intent that its gameplay would represent a "realistic and visceral" gameplay style where you couldnt run around like a chicken with your head cut off and survive, like you could in Halo. While i enjoyed the multiplayer of Gears 1, it was a long-shot from what the developers intended to create. I mean, do you really think that it was fair/made sense for the lancer to be useless? Stopping power is the only thing keeping the shotgun in check, I mean, its still very usable in the second. Im not some noob complaining. Am i really the only one who feels this way?

Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

Lol as usual, xbox triumphs over (almost) all. @wolfyrabbit I just love how ignorant PS3 fanboys like you say that xbox is "older and has bad graphics" when it ALWAYS tops what the PS3 shovels outeven with its older age, and how they whine about how xbox charges a monthly fee, which if they actually played xbox they would realize that its a bargain for the extra features you get. PS3 is only free because of its massive inferiority. Oh, and PS3 also has pirating (what kind of an insult is that??), the RROD is all but fixed (play an xbox for once and youd know that), and complaining about switching disks is just pathetic and lazy. After all, I'll take the better graphics any day if all i have to do is get up once in awhile to swap out a disc. So basically, your entire argument is that 360 is worse because its older (yet superior inevery way) and you have to stand up to change the disc. Oh no!!!!! PS3 sucks, and I actually own all three systems so I can say that with confidence.

Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

@king23 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Oh my gosh.....need to catch breath.....ok, breathe easily.....HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL! Really, its extremely obvious that PS3 is behind the times not only in its online service but also its graphics. All you PS3 fans ever say is, "its been proven that PS3 has better graphics", but since none of their games have better graphics, what do you have? NOTHING. Suck it up like a man and accept the facts. You guys kjust cant accept that whenever gamespot gives a fair comparison between two systems, it HAS to be biased in someway. "Oh, microsoft payed them off!" Whatever. The facts are her. Accept them for what they are and take your dumb comments away from this comparison.

Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

@c_fawcett - I have my console for games, not DVD's, which is clearly what you have your PS3 for @awheaton All I have to say is that Fox's Discount Brain Surgery Clinic is open 24/7 over here. Of course you may not be able to afford it after your PS3 purchase. @Ivoon Fanboy. (Lol just kidding) yeah the graphics do look best in the first level, but I still though the rest of the game looked great as well. Not as great as other 360 games, but still nice.

Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

Avatar image for MetalMan300
MetalMan300

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalMan300

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

  • 16 results
  • 1
  • 2