LuLuClassiC's forum posts

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for LuLuClassiC
LuLuClassiC

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 LuLuClassiC
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

Well I wish that they'd have more great title on the wii, but I still have my killer app; "Super Mario Galaxy." And this alone is

enough for me to justify a purchasing of a wii.

Avatar image for LuLuClassiC
LuLuClassiC

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 LuLuClassiC
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

I personally think Super Mario Galaxy is better. A true masterpiece.

This is personal opinion, but I don't think Twilight Princess is a masterpiece.

It is indeed a great game, but for a Zelda, it felt a bit lacking. (This also

may be due to my personal infatuation with Zelda and thus the high expectation)

But in the end, I really don't think you should be 'torn' in deciding which is better;

if you like 'em both, so be it! There's nothing wrong with that.

Art is something that can never properly be ranked;

the scores are just relative references, nothing more.

Avatar image for LuLuClassiC
LuLuClassiC

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 LuLuClassiC
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

Like what Dr up there said,

when I first played brawl and saw that they got rid of L-cancelling,

I was immediately turned off. (I was practically like "you can't do anything!")

I think lot of the players [who used L-cancelling] felt the same way.

with L-canceling, you can do things like SHFFL, Wave Dash, and these

allow all sorts of attacks for different characters.

It's sort of like how in Mario Kart wii they try and limit players from doing snaking.

However, players have found all sorts of techniques for Brawl such as DAC, arrow-canceling and etc.

so I see no reason why advanced players would be turned off by Brawl anymore.

  • 20 results
  • 1
  • 2