Jewboy25's forum posts

Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts

[QUOTE="Jewboy25"][QUOTE="sparkypants"]

right our ancestors also burnt people at the stake and hung others because they were different. They also fought wars for religious reasons...so if we are going to live like our ancestors and kill deer and bear(which the did for food...not population control) why dont we jump in full force and start another crusade...while we're at it lets look for witches. I mean hey its only right because human population is getting alittle out of hand they seem to be taking up most if not all of earths natural resources.;)

sparkypants

No, of course not and I didint say that. we hunt because we want to have the skill, to know that we can live on our own without modern influence,like our ancestors did.also, we do do it for population control, I didnt say they did did I ;)

there are safer and more humane ways to practice your aim. you dont need to take an innocent life to do so. Also Im trying to make the point that we as humans have this Insane idea of controlling the earths population. Trust me mother nature knows how to govern itself, if there is any species here on earth that needs population control its humans. but this belief of taking innocent lives(human or not) for to improve ones skill and the over done destructiveness of modern weapons is exactly the reason why guns get a bad rep and why humans need some sort of gun control because our superiority complex and history proves that the human race cant control themselves.



Its been going on since the begining of man and it will still go on, thats mother nature, using that logic then hunting would have never been existant. Sure, if you want to learn how to aim you can go shoot at a range, but if you want to learn how to survive you have to learn how to harvets a dead animal, as gross at that sounds. You just contradicted yourself, if mother nature can govern itself why then the excess of humans? also we are part of nature so have you maybee thought that we are a part of the population control, we have to have a part, we cant just let 'mother nature' do everything. You act like improving skills are bad, Knowing how to survive in the wild, thats bad? knowing how to shoot something to sustain your life? Hunting has nothing to do with modern weapons, I dont know why your bringing that into the argument, In no way do I advocate automatic weapons, those things are just useless.
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
Lol I like how they call boll "germanys awnser to ed wood"
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
[QUOTE="Jewboy25"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

:| I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make anymore.

AirGuitarist87


my point is it wasnt a lacking argument it was clear what I was saying, it would be stupid to assume that I was implying that people dont die from gun owners because thats no where near what we were talking about.

I'm still having trouble understanding what you're trying to say. What, exactly, is your counter argument?



Criminals will have guns no matter how many laws are created to take them away.
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
[QUOTE="Jewboy25"]


No. A life between a misquito and a man is no competition.
and its not killing without remourse or cause, its doing it for population control, its doing it because our ancestors did it.
uh,,,since people stopped hunting them, they used to have much stricter hunting license and in the years that do the deer population greatly increases. no rocket science there. its not rare to find them searching peoples yards for food, then it moves to the streets, where they get hit by cars.sparkypants

right our ancestors also burnt people at the stake and hung others because they were different. They also fought wars for religious reasons...so if we are going to live like our ancestors and kill deer and bear(which the did for food...not population control) why dont we jump in full force and start another crusade...while we're at it lets look for witches. I mean hey its only right because human population is getting alittle out of hand they seem to be taking up most if not all of earths natural resources.;)

No, of course not and I didint say that. we hunt because we want to have the skill, to know that we can live on our own without modern influence,like our ancestors did.also, we do do it for population control, I didnt say they did did I ;)

Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts

[QUOTE="Jewboy25"]:lol: really! and my arguments arent very good! me saying innocents would die if i just blurted it out would be daft and you could probably say like it sound like im hinting that civilians dont die at the hands of guns but I directly quoted her so you would have to be a moron to not be able to make the connection.

I know alot of people die at the hand of guns but alot of people attain food for the night aswell.AirGuitarist87

:| I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make anymore.



my point is it wasnt a lacking argument it was clear what I was saying, it would be stupid to assume that I was implying that people dont die from gun owners because thats no where near what we were talking about.
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
[QUOTE="Jewboy25"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"] No offence, that's a terrible counter-argument.AirGuitarist87
No offense, but your not very offensive. anyways, he didnt give any reasons, why should I?

Tofu is a girl. And your argument made little sense, unlike tofu's. Saying that guns should be banned outside the military and police is a valid point, indicating they should only be used in extreme circumstances by professionals. Saying "Innocent people would die" is a bit daft, as it indicates that innocents don't die if guns are in the hands of civilians. I'll use an example: look at the differences between countries that allow guns compared to those that don't. Namely UK vs France.



:lol: really! and my arguments arent very good! me saying innocents would die if i just blurted it out would be daft and you could probably say like it sound like im hinting that civilians dont die at the hands of guns but I directly quoted her so you would have to be a moron to not be able to make the connection.

I know alot of people die at the hand of guns but alot of people attain food for the night aswell.
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
The Darkness for sure
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="Jewboy25"][QUOTE="tofu-lion91"] Agreed. They should be banned outside the military and police.

innocent people would die. thats a fact.

No offence, that's a terrible counter-argument.

No offense, but your not very offensive. anyways, he didnt give any reasons, why should I?
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
althoygh I can presume, does anyone know why?
Avatar image for Jewboy25
Jewboy25

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Jewboy25
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts
...isnt south korea have really dense traffic anyways, she should just take a bus :)