I chose both, because i found features in both

the most important features i think make up an RPG are:

coherent and reactive gameworld (set 1)

Free and rich choice of the character and stats/skills thereof; presence of an inventory with a variety of items to choose from (set 2)

this in my mind is what defines an RPG, therefore i chose both sets

I really enjoyed morrowind, also I enjoyed overlord, both games should run on your comp fine

I know morrowind is es3 while oblivion is supposed to be "better", but i enjoyed morrowind much more, along with many people i know (i'm not the only person who felt that oblivion was dumbed down for the consoles), and it also has easier demands on the computeing side

As strategy games go, you didn't go wrong with AOE 2...

I also enjoyed COD... i never noticed anything special about the audio, but that's probably a good thing, since that means that it didn't cut out or do anything it shouldn't do

Homeworld 2 and Age of Empires 2 Expansion are tied in my opinion.

Sorry, but I didn't enjoy the RTS portion of Starcraft, melee and campaign were absolutely boring for me, when I play UMS on bnet I join the maps that are basically Aoe2 copies or Homeworld 2 copies. So i played Aoe 2 and Homeworld 2 instead, and am still playing.

I know, my avatar is from Starcraft, but in my opinion Starcraft is just Homeworld 2 and Age of Empires 2 lite, so still a good game but is inferior to the Heavyweights.