Who thinks games are too expensive?

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts
I think makers need to price their games according to value. A lot of games seem to deliver less content than they should.(for example) I love CoD4 but a 5 to 6 hr campaign seems kind of cheap. At least Vegas 2 and GTA4 should provide enough content to justify the price. I just wish more games did.
Avatar image for Xx-CLOUD-xX
Xx-CLOUD-xX

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#2 Xx-CLOUD-xX
Member since 2007 • 541 Posts
Lol i personally think no games at all should be on a shelf with a 60$ price tag.. Reason is becuase we end up usually selling them anyways
Avatar image for ag1002
ag1002

13499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 ag1002
Member since 2004 • 13499 Posts
Developing games is extremely expensive. It's hard to pay over $60 for one game, so I usually rent games nowadays unless they have strong multiplayer.
Avatar image for XmashupX
XmashupX

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 XmashupX
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

That's why I only buy games I know i'll play for atleast 3 months.

But i agree 60 bucks is a killer.

Avatar image for nas-tmayne2k6
nas-tmayne2k6

514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 nas-tmayne2k6
Member since 2006 • 514 Posts

lets see

this one size fits all 60 dollar tag doesnt work, we need competition

Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts

lets see

this one size fits all 60 dollar tag doesnt work, we need competition

nas-tmayne2k6
Exactly, you don`t go in to a shoe store where every pair of shoes are the same price, and it shouldn't be that way with games either.
Avatar image for nas-tmayne2k6
nas-tmayne2k6

514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 nas-tmayne2k6
Member since 2006 • 514 Posts
[QUOTE="nas-tmayne2k6"]

lets see

this one size fits all 60 dollar tag doesnt work, we need competition

HilbillyRokstar

Exactly, you don`t go in to a shoe store where every pair of shoes are the same price, and it shouldn't be that way with games either.

theres obviously video game facsism going on, free market principles would allow large games a tag of like 65 dollars and simple games like ddr or guitar hero to be 30, plus guitar or pad.

Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts

i think its to expensive, remember back in the day when they were 40. if every game was 20 then there would probily be a lot more gamers, it would be no big deal if the game was crappy....o i just waisted 20 on this game meh only 20.

some other countries people pay around 75 for new games....

Avatar image for ag1002
ag1002

13499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 ag1002
Member since 2004 • 13499 Posts

i think its to expensive, remember back in the day when they were 40. if every game was 20 then there would probily be a lot more gamers, it would be no big deal if the game was crappy....o i just waisted 20 on this game meh only 20.

some other countries people pay around 75 for new games....

iam2green


Yeah if games were like $20 that would rock... buying a game isn't a casual thing anymore, but neither is making one.
Anyway, games for the PC are $10 cheaper than 360 games, and that's because MS sells their console for cheap but makes it's profit from overpriced games and accessories.
It'd be nice, like someone else said, if the simpler games like Guitar Hero would sell for cheaper or something... but every game, even if it's a piece of junk, is sold for $60 or even up to $80 (canada)
Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
thats why i use gamefly. much better deal for me
Avatar image for -Montauk-
-Montauk-

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -Montauk-
Member since 2007 • 880 Posts
My only problem is with budget games and sports games. If it's a budget game, it should be budget priced, if it's sports game with a couple new features from the previous one, it shouldn't be full price. TDU was awesome for $40. I don't know how much EDF 2017 was when it came out, but I really hope it was $40. Even $50 for that game would be pushing it.
Avatar image for Jo023
Jo023

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Jo023
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
i truly dont mind payin for a game like call of duty or gears of war with a 65 dollar price tag. But when they expect u to pay 60 dollars for games such as turok, the club, and lost odyssey, i bleive that is outrageous. Games such as they where they arent as good should be marketed down to to 45 dollar price tag.
Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
My only problem is with budget games and sports games. If it's a budget game, it should be budget priced, if it's sports game with a couple new features from the previous one, it shouldn't be full price. TDU was awesome for $40. I don't know how much EDF 2017 was when it came out, but I really hope it was $40. Even $50 for that game would be pushing it.-Montauk-
EDF was 40...
Avatar image for xFuryx
xFuryx

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#14 xFuryx
Member since 2007 • 745 Posts
Yeah, 60 dollars is a steep price for only one game. I use ebay, I've only paid full price for one game (gears).
Avatar image for -Montauk-
-Montauk-

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 -Montauk-
Member since 2007 • 880 Posts
[QUOTE="-Montauk-"]My only problem is with budget games and sports games. If it's a budget game, it should be budget priced, if it's sports game with a couple new features from the previous one, it shouldn't be full price. TDU was awesome for $40. I don't know how much EDF 2017 was when it came out, but I really hope it was $40. Even $50 for that game would be pushing it.zero9167
EDF was 40...

Alright, that's good. I just got it like a week ago, I didn't remember how much it was originally.
Avatar image for simardbrad
simardbrad

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 simardbrad
Member since 2004 • 2355 Posts
remember when N64 games and Snes games were $89.99? I do, that's why I had so little because it was soooo expensive.
Avatar image for nas-tmayne2k6
nas-tmayne2k6

514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#17 nas-tmayne2k6
Member since 2006 • 514 Posts
thats because cartdridges were circuit boards. dvds are cheap as hell compared to a cartridge
Avatar image for LynchMob09R
LynchMob09R

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 LynchMob09R
Member since 2003 • 1145 Posts
thatz why you wait til the price drops or buy it for cheap online!!! :D
Avatar image for RevernedICE
RevernedICE

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 RevernedICE
Member since 2006 • 1192 Posts
i, just like every other gamer would love to not have to pay 60 bucks for a game, but the fact of the matter is we are still going to pay it as long as we get the game. if the demand fits...
Avatar image for WSGRandomPerson
WSGRandomPerson

13697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#20 WSGRandomPerson
Member since 2007 • 13697 Posts
Yeah but COD4 has endless hours on multiplayer so it may be worth the 60. I wish games were back to 50 dollars like with the PS2 days..
Avatar image for Spartans_317
Spartans_317

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Spartans_317
Member since 2007 • 364 Posts

You notice that allot of DVDs are the same price. I believe the games need to stay where they are because it supports the economy. There is nothing wrong with the economy right now. The economy has just dropped a little bit but it will go back up. It has happened in the past. Games are expensive to make. Developers and Publishers cant drop the price of low content of games because when they do that, they can run out of money.

Avatar image for Spartans_317
Spartans_317

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Spartans_317
Member since 2007 • 364 Posts
Companies are trying to received alot of money from games to build more developers and this goes into making more games and more money and supports the economy more.
Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts
I don`t buy the whole "games are expensive to make" crap, aren`t they expensive to make for pc? How come those games are $10 cheaper?
Avatar image for luc11044
luc11044

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#24 luc11044
Member since 2004 • 4606 Posts

Actually, despite the rising costs in development, games are not more expensive now than they were in the early 1990s.

I remember buying new games for the 3DO or Sega CD that were $69 or even $79 Canadian back then. Considering inflation and the rising costs, I'd say the prices are very respectable because today, I can pick up new releases for $59 Canadian.

Food for thought...

Avatar image for Spartans_317
Spartans_317

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Spartans_317
Member since 2007 • 364 Posts

Dude, thats because games is the main thing you do on consoles. Companies make PC games less because there are more stuff you can do on computers that you have to pay for.

Avatar image for luc11044
luc11044

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#26 luc11044
Member since 2004 • 4606 Posts

I don`t buy the whole "games are expensive to make" crap, aren`t they expensive to make for pc? How come those games are $10 cheaper?HilbillyRokstar

and how many bugs come out on the pc versions of games? How many patches do you need to download in order to get it to work on certain pc's?

Thanks, I'll pay the extra $10 to ensure mine is compatible and works perfectly on my 360.

Avatar image for Doku16
Doku16

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Doku16
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I deffinettly think games are too expensive, and because of this I can only buy the ones I really want, I know developing games is an expensive chore, but COME ON!!!!! Like Eregon? I bought the game for ten bucks, and I just can't believe it was set to 60 at one time!
Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts

Dude, thats because games is the main thing you do on consoles. Companies make PC games less because there are more stuff you can do on computers that you have to pay for.

Spartans_317
You just supported my argument....and disputed your own.
Avatar image for luc11044
luc11044

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#29 luc11044
Member since 2004 • 4606 Posts

I deffinettly think games are too expensive, and because of this I can only buy the ones I really want, I know developing games is an expensive chore, but COME ON!!!!! Like Eregon? I bought the game for ten bucks, and I just can't believe it was set to 60 at one time!Doku16

well, that's not an argument... You can't expect all games to be good.

Avatar image for capthavic
capthavic

6478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#30 capthavic
Member since 2003 • 6478 Posts
If you don't like it then don't pay it. Wait a year or so and it'll be cheaper. Simple!
Avatar image for Spartans_317
Spartans_317

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Spartans_317
Member since 2007 • 364 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartans_317"]

Dude, thats because games is the main thing you do on consoles. Companies make PC games less because there are more stuff you can do on computers that you have to pay for.

HilbillyRokstar

You just supported my argument....and disputed your own.

Uh no.....you were complaing about games on PC being 50 dollars and console games being 60. I pointed out why.

Avatar image for patsfan4liferjn
patsfan4liferjn

1253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 patsfan4liferjn
Member since 2007 • 1253 Posts
u guys wouldnt think its expensive if u had jobs. and do u no how hard it is to make video games? how long ti takes to make them? $60 is a fair price.
Avatar image for painstation2
painstation2

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 painstation2
Member since 2005 • 139 Posts
Get a job....
Avatar image for BLAS1AN
BLAS1AN

3508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 BLAS1AN
Member since 2003 • 3508 Posts
What I cant stand is Microsoft selling Halo 3 for $60 that only included 9 multiplayer maps and then charging us an additional $10 more for 3 additional maps. I didnt give in and by the new maps though.
Avatar image for venasque
venasque

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 venasque
Member since 2005 • 373 Posts

I agree about content to a certain extent but the cost to create game is very expensive these days. And we have to remember that as the consumer we have a lot of power. If a company undelivers in the quality department, then don't buy their game. If a company innovates then support them by buying their game. And don't buy used, because that doesn't go to the publishers and supports the rip off game stores.

More information on the breakdown of the cost can be found here. Where does your $60 go?

Avatar image for Typonese
Typonese

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Typonese
Member since 2005 • 158 Posts

Whoever attempts to provide justification for the wallet slaughtering that is a modern video game purchase has either (A) More money than they have sense or (B) some hand in the industry.

$65 could potentially be a week's worth of groceries, instead for us it's an 8 hour romp through some underwater dystopia. It was hard in 2006 to go from paying $40-50 for new games for your PS2 to paying $60-70 for your 360, a system that set you back a few hundred dollars and a kidney short to boot. Furthermore, games, while they're certainly better to look at aren't getting any longer! This is theft to some degree.

Consumers have every right to think of this as murder.

This is an issue that needs to be fixed and soon.

Avatar image for luc11044
luc11044

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#37 luc11044
Member since 2004 • 4606 Posts

Whoever attempts to provide justification for the wallet slaughtering that is a modern video game purchase has either (A) More money than they have sense or (B) some hand in the industry.

$65 could potentially be a week's worth of groceries, instead for us it's an 8 hour romp through some underwater dystopia. It was hard in 2006 to go from paying $40-50 for new games for your PS2 to paying $60-70 for your 360, a system that set you back a few hundred dollars and a kidney short to boot. Furthermore, games, while they're certainly better to look at aren't getting any longer! This is theft to some degree.

Consumers have every right to think of this as murder.

This is an issue that needs to be fixed and soon.

Typonese

not going to happen and you obviously have a lot of frustration about this. Like someone posted before, no one's forcing your hand to buy these "expensive" games.

Avatar image for destinhpark
destinhpark

4831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#38 destinhpark
Member since 2006 • 4831 Posts

i truly dont mind payin for a game like call of duty or gears of war with a 65 dollar price tag. But when they expect u to pay 60 dollars for games such as turok, the club, and lost odyssey, i bleive that is outrageous. Games such as they where they arent as good should be marketed down to to 45 dollar price tag.Jo023

......LO is well worth 60 dollars, but I agree with Turok and the club..

Avatar image for MattRushmore
MattRushmore

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 MattRushmore
Member since 2008 • 246 Posts

I think makers need to price their games according to value. A lot of games seem to deliver less content than they should.(for example) I love CoD4 but a 5 to 6 hr campaign seems kind of cheap. At least Vegas 2 and GTA4 should provide enough content to justify the price. I just wish more games did. HilbillyRokstar

With over 110 hours into the game so far (campaign AND multiplayer combined) I personally feel like I got my money's worth on COD4 more than any other game on the 360. But, yeah, bringing prices down on the crap games would be great.

Avatar image for Typonese
Typonese

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Typonese
Member since 2005 • 158 Posts

I'm just a frustrated person in general, I will still buy THEM (THEY'VE become quite selective the past few years for better or worse) but I can still complain about it right?

Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
when you end up buyin a ton of new games a year and are a collecter and not a trade-in-dumdy then yest games are way to expensive, but even if they stayed at $50 ppl would still be complainin, just dont buy so many damn games, rent the ones that are short or your not sure about
Avatar image for dalestorry
dalestorry

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 dalestorry
Member since 2006 • 218 Posts
well if people had jobs i dont see why they would complain about $60 for a game... get over it... i live in australia and i have to pay $100AUS when new games come out...but i dont care coz i have a weekly income...seriously how many people here are penny pinchers
Avatar image for beatlesguru
beatlesguru

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 beatlesguru
Member since 2006 • 303 Posts
it has become more and more expensive because games demand more and more work. Video games have come a long way and have become more and more advanced in a short amount of time.
Avatar image for blue_tape
blue_tape

2868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 blue_tape
Member since 2007 • 2868 Posts
You paid $60 for COD4? Sucker. I paid $38 and most games now are coming down in price within a few months of release. Patience is a buyer's virtue.
Avatar image for Jay2800
Jay2800

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Jay2800
Member since 2007 • 141 Posts
my words exactly.
Avatar image for mcknightvt
mcknightvt

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 mcknightvt
Member since 2004 • 35 Posts

remember when N64 games and Snes games were $89.99? I do, that's why I had so little because it was soooo expensive.simardbrad

I'm glad someone else remembers this, because it really puts things in perspective. Plus, I've heard that NES games, adjusted for inflation, were about $90 also. When you consider how much more content is in a game like Oblivion GOTY or Mass Effect for $60 than Contra, which can be beaten in an hour, for $90, it seems like today's games are a steal. Or you can just wait a few years and get games cheaply like I do. In the meantime, older games are just fine.

Avatar image for Yng-ePIc
Yng-ePIc

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Yng-ePIc
Member since 2005 • 804 Posts
I thought that since I dropped 60 dollars for Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time years ago. That game was well worth it, but damn.
Avatar image for CrackerRiley023
CrackerRiley023

1057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 CrackerRiley023
Member since 2003 • 1057 Posts
I completely agree with the statement that games should not all cost the same. Some companies are stealing money from people by charging $60 for their game. Sure it cost a lot to make a game nowadays but you don't see any of those companies going bankrupt now do you? I see it this way. Games have not changed drastically since the ps2, xbox 1 days. Sure they are better looking but that comes with the better hardware. I did not see the need for games to go from $50 to $60 from last gen to the current.
Avatar image for funkyeyk
funkyeyk

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 funkyeyk
Member since 2005 • 404 Posts

Whoever attempts to provide justification for the wallet slaughtering that is a modern video game purchase has either (A) More money than they have sense or (B) some hand in the industry.

$65 could potentially be a week's worth of groceries, instead for us it's an 8 hour romp through some underwater dystopia. It was hard in 2006 to go from paying $40-50 for new games for your PS2 to paying $60-70 for your 360, a system that set you back a few hundred dollars and a kidney short to boot. Furthermore, games, while they're certainly better to look at aren't getting any longer! This is theft to some degree.

Consumers have every right to think of this as murder.

This is an issue that needs to be fixed and soon.

Typonese

A fair viewpoint, but it comes down to the fact that gaming is a luxury. If someone is skipping groceries to buy Xbox games, they need to get some priorities in order.

And there are always ways to get cheaper games. Ebay, Craigslist, Half.com, Friends, Video Store Used Bins, etc... I think I've only payed full price for 1 game on the Xbox.

Avatar image for luc11044
luc11044

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#50 luc11044
Member since 2004 • 4606 Posts

I completely agree with the statement that games should not all cost the same. Some companies are stealing money from people by charging $60 for their game. Sure it cost a lot to make a game nowadays but you don't see any of those companies going bankrupt now do you? I see it this way. Games have not changed drastically since the ps2, xbox 1 days. Sure they are better looking but that comes with the better hardware. I did not see the need for games to go from $50 to $60 from last gen to the current.CrackerRiley023

Well, I don't at all agree with this. Remember companies like Acclaim that went bankrupt...or Atari with their well publicisized struggles...even EA had to close down their Chicago office.

Competition in the game industry is fierce and for the amount of money it takes to create a game, it's understandable that publishers had to slightly increase the cost.

Again, in the early 1990s, with the N64 and other systems like the 3DO, we used to pay over $60 back then. If you factor in cost increases and inflation, the fact that nowadays most quality games are much longer. we're getting a pretty good deal.