[QUOTE="minh800"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Well, see, for starters, you are assuming that Monster Hunter fans identify the series with the PSP whereas I argue that might not necessarily be the case. If the games had been on the DS, who knows how much they would have sold? I argue that the games will sell more on the 3DS for a simple reason- not only will the core Monster Hunter fanbase pick the 3DS and the 3DS versions up, but the Pokemon+Animal Crossing+Dragon Quest+Professor Layton crowd, that initially might have been interested in the series but never tried it out because it wasn't on the DS, will most likely decide to give the games a go too. By sheer numbers, I'm assuming the 3DS versions will sell more.charizard1605
I'm saying that core games sell better on devices that target core gamers. So far, nothing I've seen has made me rethink my position. This is no different. The Vita is more poised as a core gamer's device than the 3DS.
Isn't that a baseless assumption? Did the entire MGS fanbase pick up the PSP and MGS games up? No. Did the entire Tales fanbase pick up Graces and the Wii? No. Would the entire GTA fanbase pick up a WiiU and the game for an exclusive game? No. Why would the MH fanbase pick up the 3DS for it? Why should we judge them any differently?
I think those Pokemon, Layton, and Animal Crossing crowds wouldn't be that interested in MH.
What makes you think the 3DS is less of a core gamers' device than the Vita? There is literally nothing that indicates this. And we'll see in about a years' time :PEverything from aesthetics, to the hardware, and many of the announced games scream core to me much more than the 3DS. And since most of the "system sellers" I keep seeing for the 3DS feel more suited for general audiences (Nintendo fans, children, casuals), it just feels like that's what the 3DS will sell to - a general audience. Unlike the Vita which seems to target one specific group (and does so pretty well).
Log in to comment