So, looking at the opinions for and against supporting mouse/keyboard in FPS games, I think all are in agreement that the mouse/keyboard combo provides the most accurate control.
People against the idea have these reasons:
1. Using keyboard/mouse doesn't allow you to play the games in a relaxed position.
2. They don't want to compete online with people using mouse/keyboard, and it's because if people start using mouse/keyboard, then they'd be forced to use it too in order to keep up. Which would suck because now you can't slouch on your sofa.
I subscribe to PC Gamer, and from time to time they slam on console gaming. The biggest complaint/excuse PC Gamer uses is how gaming on PC with mouse/keyboard provides the best control for RTS/FPS, and how consoles don't have this kind of control finesse. I'm not against PC gaming, mind you, I just can't afford to keep up with upgrading my PC, where a decent video card costs upwards of $500. I'm more willing to put up $600 for a PS3 and put up the rest of my money on a big screen TV. At least the combination should last more than 3-years.
Does it take more skill to use the PS3 controller in FPS than a mouse/keyboard? Absolutely! I know I won't last long in an online game if I use a PS3 controller, I totally suck at it. But that's like saying that it takes more skill to hit a target at 200 yards with an M1-Garand than with a modern sniper rifle. But is that a reason to keep using an M1-Garand, when you know that you could have used a better rifle? I personally wouldn't find it very fun.
Log in to comment