Mike Tyson vs. Bruce Lee, who would win?

They are fighting in a UFC style octagon with no rules and no protective gear. No gloves, cup, headgear, arm pads, nothing. I'm talking about Mike Tyson and Bruce Lee in their prime. The fact is Mike Tyson is a heavy weight boxer, while Bruce Lee is a light weight martial artist. If you was to place a $1000 bet, who would it be on?

LMAO

Tyson would completely destroy Lee. This comparison is stupid as fvck

Tyson. As I became older I realized a lot of Bruce's feats were exaggerated, and just part of the mystique of his death. lonewolf604

Tyson would win and this is coming from a big Bruce Lee fan.

Bruce Lee was black belt and tyson a boxer. Bruce Lee'd finish Tyson in no time if he was alive.

I don't know anything about fighting (even sport fighting), but I do know that Mike Tyson in Mike Tyson's Punch-Out! is WAAAAAYY harder to beat than Dragon Chan in Super Punch-Out!, so I'm going with Mike Tyson.

tyson has a huge weight advantage and is still living. he would easily win

[QUOTE="indzman"]

Bruce Lee was black belt and tyson a boxer. Bruce Lee'd finish Tyson in no time if he was alive.

thegerg

was Tyson a martial artist as well? You know martial artists have special moves which are quite deadly if applied appropiately, in this context i was saying lee got a chance.

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="indzman"]

Bruce Lee was black belt and tyson a boxer. Bruce Lee'd finish Tyson in no time if he was alive.

indzman

was Tyson a martial artist as well? You know martial artists have special moves which are quite deadly if applied appropiately, in this context i was saying lee got a chance.

Oh i take back my word as i didn't knew Tyson was a martial artist as well. Then Mike Tyson will win as he will be able to predict/block and even counteract lee's moves plus he got more advantages as body mass, height, strenght over lee lol.

[QUOTE="indzman"]Oh i take back my word as i didn't knew Tyson was a martial artist as well. thegerg

Isn't boxing and martial arts like judo, karate different?

[QUOTE="indzman"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Really? Because your first post in this thread makes it clear that you did. "tyson a boxer"thegerg

Isn't boxing and martial arts like judo, karate different?

Sorry really had no idea boxing also fall under martial arts category lol.

Bruce Lee was tiny. He'd be destroyed by Tyson in his prime.

Tyson.

HE'S A WRECKING MACHINE

Lee wouldn't make it through the first round.

Why WOULDN'T the obvious choice be Tyson?

Dude was massive, and Lee was small. Not to take away from whatever reputation Lee has, but Tyson would be so much stronger if they were both in their prime

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Gamefan1986

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Gamefan1986

[QUOTE="Gamefan1986"]

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Fightingfan

If Lee got him down to the ground he wouldn't let him back up again without choking him out.

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="Gamefan1986"]

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Gamefan1986

If Lee got him down to the ground he wouldn't let him back up again without choking him out.

[QUOTE="lonewolf604"]Tyson. As I became older I realized a lot of Bruce's feats were exaggerated, and just part of the mystique of his death. Fightingfan

[QUOTE="indzman"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Your reasoning for saying Lee would win is that they are both martial artists?Chris_Williams

was Tyson a martial artist as well? You know martial artists have special moves which are quite deadly if applied appropiately, in this context i was saying lee got a chance.

Tyson would KILL Lee in one hit. It wouldn't even be close.

Ali beats both.

LMAO

Tyson would completely destroy Lee. This comparison is stupid as fvck

Aljosa23

[QUOTE="indzman"]Oh i take back my word as i didn't knew Tyson was a martial artist as well. thegerg

[QUOTE="Gamefan1986"]

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

Bucked20

Lee was used to take an inmense beating and he could still get up seconds. Being honest, if we are talking about resilence here, i'd say that Lee would have the edge.

[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="Gamefan1986"]

Bruce Lee would win because Tyson would only know how to fight with his fists while Lee knew a lot about everything, and would have had more experience in real fights.

Sure Tyson would have the size advantage, but Lee would have a massive speed, knowledge, and experience edge. Plus Lee was pretty damn strong himself, he did 2 finger pushups easier than most people reach around to wipe their butts before they flush.

lightleggy

Lee was used to take an inmense beating and he could still get up seconds. Being honest, if we are talking about resilence here, i'd say that Lee would have the edge.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"]

Lee was used to take an inmense beating and he could still get up seconds. Being honest, if we are talking about resilence here, i'd say that Lee would have the edge.

InEMplease

600lbs Sumo Vs 169lbs Japanese Man

Tyson puts tigers in muhfvcking headlocks. What does Lee do besides fancy looking pushups?

Oh and for the guys who dont know: Lee won 3 boxing competitions, and he was never a boxer., he only used Wing Chun to defeat all of his boxing opponents. And he was also a hong kong gang member and it is known that he broke his opponent's arm in one fight when they sucker punched him so hard in the eye that he almost lost it. Yeah, I'd say he would definitely have the edge.lightleggy