[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="Bloodaxe726"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="anesthesie"]I said violence was against a living creature. No where in there did it talk about it having to do with a business or location.Bloodaxe726
You could be violent towards an inanimate object if you wanted toYou could act violent, but that wouldn't be AN act of violence. Big difference.
You can have homicidal thoughts but that doesn't make you a killer. That makes you a very dangerous person with homicidal tendencies.
Having violent thoughts and acting violent are two very different things that you just claimed to be the same thing, and there is no real difference in acting violent and commiting and act of violence.
You're saying exactly what I said but claiming I didn't say it.
Having homicidal tendencies does not equal Homicidal.
And acting violent does not equate with violent acts.
Acting violent is the same thing as a violent act, just worded differently, you compared thinking violently to acting violently.
It was actually a comment directed at the user with the Emma Watson picture, who said you can be violent to an inanimate object. Which you can't. THAT isactingviolently.
Look up "act" with your dictionary.
Log in to comment