This thread is getting boring.....Wolf-avatar
is leather murder too?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Toriko42"]Call me immoral but I don't feel bad when I see those videos of Animals being beaten and skinnedI agree. Most of PETA's actions are just for attention.
I think we should worry about humans before we worry about animals. PETA are also a bunch of hypocrites as well and they're actions are idiotic.
FalcoLX
Of course we should place the well-being of human beings above that of animals, but you guys don't feel bad when you see animals being clubbed to death and then skinned?..
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]I believe the term I would currently use for them is "Eco-terrorists".
anesthesie
Yes, well, Mr. Rock-Me-Amadeus, when nobody listens and keeps slaughtering innocent creatures what else is there to do? Shock value is the only thing people listen to.
And "Eco-Terrorists?!" Give me a f*cking break. The thing they're most famous for is nude ads. Hardly terrorists.
Rodney Coronado. A member of the Animal Liberation Front, an organization that is classified by the FBI as 'domestic terrorists.' Coronado himself has been imprisoned for firebombing animal testing labs.PETA has openly endorsed the ALF and contributed large sums of money to the legal defense of Coronado. >_>
Good God, just because they supported his defence doesn't meant they took part in his crimes.
Besides, the FBI are a bunch of paranoiacs, they label you a 'domestic terrorist' if you go to flipping Cuba.
The ALF has been implicated in several incidents with firebombing animal testing labs. Sounds alot like terrorism to me. By giving them money, PETA has shown that they not only condone, but support their actions. >_>[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]I believe the term I would currently use for them is "Eco-terrorists".
PannicAtack
Yes, well, Mr. Rock-Me-Amadeus, when nobody listens and keeps slaughtering innocent creatures what else is there to do? Shock value is the only thing people listen to.
And "Eco-Terrorists?!" Give me a f*cking break. The thing they're most famous for is nude ads. Hardly terrorists.
Rodney Coronado. A member of the Animal Liberation Front, an organization that is classified by the FBI as 'domestic terrorists.' Coronado himself has been imprisoned for firebombing animal testing labs.PETA has openly endorsed the ALF and contributed large sums of money to the legal defense of Coronado. >_>
Good God, just because they supported his defence doesn't meant they took part in his crimes.
Besides, the FBI are a bunch of paranoiacs, they label you a 'domestic terrorist' if you go to flipping Cuba.
The ALF has been implicated in several incidents with firebombing animal testing labs. Sounds alot like terrorism to me. >_>Once again, when the Hell did ALF become synonymous with PETA?
Defending Coronado is a pathetic excuse.
[QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]This thread is getting boring.....dissonantblack
is leather murder too?
I only use Fake Leather.I dont think its the same as fur but I dont think its right.Fake leather is just the same as real.Also that hat you said that had fur on it.What ever its called,I heard it has Rabbit fur on it.I forgot the name of it though. >_>
[QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]I believe the term I would currently use for them is "Eco-terrorists".
anesthesie
Yes, well, Mr. Rock-Me-Amadeus, when nobody listens and keeps slaughtering innocent creatures what else is there to do? Shock value is the only thing people listen to.
And "Eco-Terrorists?!" Give me a f*cking break. The thing they're most famous for is nude ads. Hardly terrorists.
They deliver their point through fear(in a way) >.>
I'm seeing way too many animal rights threads lately... I wonder why >.> ~ de arimasucfamgcn
Im a well known user.
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]I believe the term I would currently use for them is "Eco-terrorists".
TheOddQuantum
Yes, well, Mr. Rock-Me-Amadeus, when nobody listens and keeps slaughtering innocent creatures what else is there to do? Shock value is the only thing people listen to.
And "Eco-Terrorists?!" Give me a f*cking break. The thing they're most famous for is nude ads. Hardly terrorists.
They deliver their point through fear(in a way) >.>
I'd say honesty, not fear.
Because when they kill animals for fur that is really what they do, it's not a dramatization.
To anyone who believes PETA is a great organization, I beg you to watch this. (Warning: Vulgar language)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ijLulwUTY
bigfatcrap
Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
PannicAtack
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
[QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]I believe the term I would currently use for them is "Eco-terrorists".
anesthesie
Yes, well, Mr. Rock-Me-Amadeus, when nobody listens and keeps slaughtering innocent creatures what else is there to do? Shock value is the only thing people listen to.
And "Eco-Terrorists?!" Give me a f*cking break. The thing they're most famous for is nude ads. Hardly terrorists.
They deliver their point through fear(in a way) >.>
I'd say honesty, not fear.
Because when they kill animals for fur that is really what they do, it's not a dramatization.
Your right..its Murder!!The only reason there is still fur trade is so they can make those stupid fur coats and stuff for fashion,Its just so wrong.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
But she funded and supported the crimes, thus encouraging others to do the same thing, causing more crimes of the sort.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
PannicAtack
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
Bloodaxe726
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
But she funded and supported the crimes, thus encouraging others to do the same thing, causing more crimes of the sort.
My father once gave money to the homeless Brian David Mitchell, does that mean he is guilty of Ms. Smart's kidnapping?
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
Than she's stupid, what would you think a known terrorist is going to do with money?
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
carrot-cake
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
Bloodaxe726
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
Than she's stupid, what would you think a known terrorist is going to do with money?
Because on the surface they just appear to be another animal rights group, and I'm sorry, but Ms. Newkirk isn't psychic. You can't suspect people before they've done anything wrong.
[QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
[QUOTE="Bloodaxe726"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
Than she's stupid, what would you think a known terrorist is going to do with money?
Because on the surface they just appear to be another animal rights group, and I'm sorry, but Ms. Newkirk isn't psychic. You can't suspect people before they've done anything wrong.
That's a load of crap. The ALF is known for acts of vandalism, intimidation, and arson. Their slogan is 'Direct Action.' >_>[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
carrot-cake
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
The only thing that I have not thought through in my statements is that I shouldn't waste my time on your idiotic remarks.
I just backed my statements up, you, for whatever reason, didn't want to recognize it or didn't notice.
READ before you WRITE.
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="Bloodaxe726"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
PannicAtack
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
Than she's stupid, what would you think a known terrorist is going to do with money?
Because on the surface they just appear to be another animal rights group, and I'm sorry, but Ms. Newkirk isn't psychic. You can't suspect people before they've done anything wrong.
That's a load of crap. The ALF is known for acts of vandalism, intimidation, and arson. Their slogan is 'Direct Action.' >_>That's all relative to what you find wrong, isn't it.
These acts of 'arson' you speak of are really just setting free imprisoned animals. Yes, that was somebody's trade, but again, if the ignorant masses won't listen then make them.
[QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
The only thing that I have not thought through in my statements is that I shouldn't waste my time on your idiotic remarks.
I just backed my statements up, you, for whatever reason, didn't want to recognize it or didn't notice.
READ before you WRITE.
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
carrot-cake
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
The only thing that I have not thought through in my statements is that I shouldn't waste my time on your idiotic remarks.
I just backed my statements up, you, for whatever reason, didn't want to recognize it or didn't notice.
READ before you WRITE.
What the Hell makes a link make my argument credible? It's not a link that makes a credible argument, it's that you know what the Hell you're talking about. Unlike yourself.
If you need information to argue about something that you don't know enough about, then find it yourself. I'm not patronizing you.
I arrested someone about a month ago for throwing a puppy out of a 2nd floor window. PETA called me asking about the particulars of the case. Never called back. Didn't want anything I said to be taken out of context or scewed.Sabin55
Skewed.
[QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="carrot-cake"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, has openly voiced support for them and given them money. >_>
anesthesie
How many times must I say it?
She didn't commit the crimes, therefore she is not a terrorist.
She funded them. If you hand the weapons to a hitman, knowing the intention, you share responsibility in the murder. >_>I suppose in that ridiculous scenario, yes, you would be guilty. But Ingrid was never told what was to be done with the money.
What the Hell do you mean it means nothing? Of course it does. I was answering his point, and by your logic; why does anybody else's point mean anything?
I don't have to be a member of PETA to know that Ingrid didn't know what they were going to do with her money.
The only thing that I have not thought through in my statements is that I shouldn't waste my time on your idiotic remarks.
I just backed my statements up, you, for whatever reason, didn't want to recognize it or didn't notice.
READ before you WRITE.
What the Hell makes a link make my argument credible? It's not a link that makes a credible argument, it's that you know what the Hell you're talking about. Unlike yourself.
If you need information to argue about something that you don't know enough about, then find it yourself. I'm not patronizing you.
[QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]Well,This just proves that Fur is Wrong.
anesthesie
I mean, of course it is... but what does?
The fact than an Innocent animal was beat to near death then skinned alive,only for someone to wear its skin in a fashion show.
Fur is natural and keeps you warm, why should we wear artificial polymers that are not biodegradable?
An animal can defend itself, a plant on the other hand... who's really being cruel?
(Devil's Advocate)
[QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]Well,This just proves that Fur is Wrong.
Wolf-avatar
I mean, of course it is... but what does?
The fact than an Innocent animal was beat to near death then skinned alive,only for someone to wear its skin in a fashion show.
Ah, OK.
.... You mean the video???
Fur is natural and keeps you warm, why should we wear artificial polymers that are not biodegradable?
An animal can defend itself, a plant on the other hand... who's really being cruel?
(Devil's Advocate)
entropyecho
I do hope you're being sarcastic.
That's all relative to what you find wrong, isn't it.You condone arson and theft. Wonderful.These acts of 'arson' you speak of are really just setting free imprisoned animals. Yes, that was somebody's trade, but again, if the ignorant masses won't listen then make them.
anesthesie
Fur is natural and keeps you warm, why should we wear artificial polymers that are not biodegradable?
An animal can defend itself, a plant on the other hand... who's really being cruel?
(Devil's Advocate)
entropyecho
An animal cant defend its self when its leg is snapped in half by a trap.
PETA is an evil company really.
Now im for animal rights and stuff but why must you show me these torture videos of animals dieing? Why would this change my opinion and I would morely question why you also send this video to children....
not to mention PETA are all goddamn terrorists. firebombing bulidings? are you jokeing!?!?! Why can't you make a peaceful soulition instead of useing violence??? your teaching your children to become friken terrorists.
I Feel that they should get shut down. But here in America Freedom of Speech keeps them alive which is kinda odd knowing that they must have burned down like 6 buildings so far.
[QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"][QUOTE="anesthesie"][QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]Well,This just proves that Fur is Wrong.
anesthesie
I mean, of course it is... but what does?
The fact than an Innocent animal was beat to near death then skinned alive,only for someone to wear its skin in a fashion show.
Ah, OK.
.... You mean the video???
Not just the video,Thousands of animals are killed the same way every day for the sake of fashion.
Fur is natural and keeps you warm, why should we wear artificial polymers that are not biodegradable?
An animal can defend itself, a plant on the other hand... who's really being cruel?
(Devil's Advocate)
entropyecho
How is a plant even a liveing creature... It dosen't move or do anything with its life.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment