[QUOTE="0mega3FattyAcid"]
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I am a gun owner and have a state concealed carry license and am a member of the NRA, so I'm obviously pro gun. However unlike many of my fellow NRA members I do believe in some gun control measuers, in fact most supporters of the right to bear arms do. If someone wants to own a gun they need to know the basics, I feel that hunters safety must be required for anyone looking to purchase a fire arm, as well as hand gun saftey for hand gun owners.
I also support more thorough background checks (there are loop holes, trust me) and mental health checks before a person can buy a fire arm. I go the gun range quite often, not as much as I used to but at least twice a week. I feel it's important for me to know how to use my fire arm efficently if need be, however at the gun range I often see people who should NOT be handling fire arms.
I often see wannabe gangster tough guys who think guns make them "cool" and other such loonies, I met one kid who was there with his older brother that thought he knew everything about guns because he plays COD, I'm being serious. People like that have no business around guns, period. But I don't like the anti-gun crowd, all of their arguments are irrational and no one is going to take my guns away from me.
Besides it's the criminals that love gun control the most, they get their guns off the black market, they will always have guns. By banning guns or enforcing strict control laws, all your doing is making it harder for innocent people to protect themselves and making it easier for criminals to hurt people.
ShadowMoses900
Totally agree. Just to make things clear, i'm all for people posessing guns. Makes no difference to me. I was just pointing out the arguement that pro-2nd amendment people were saying about if Belcher didn't have a gun, he would have stabbed his girlfriend or found some other method so they would have been dead anyways. And THAT I don't agree with. At the end of the statement on Sunday Night Football, it was mentioned that if Belcher didn't have a gun, him and his girlfriend would still be alive. THAT I agree with.
While it is true he could have used a different weapon, it would have probably been more difficult. What people don't understand is when it comes to self defense and just combat in general, it's not like the movies at all. It's a "balance of power" so to speak, and unconciously you want to tip that balance in your favor and a gun does that completely.
If you have a gun and the other person doesn't, you have the power of that situation.With a knife the assailant would have not gotten very far I don't think, he could have gotten taken down or tackled at the least, but I don't know much about the situation.
The thing that bothers me though from anti-gun people is some of them stereotype repsonsible gun owners like myself as dumb red necks and other such nonsense. I feel safer with a gun and I know how to use one effectively, I have never been in hand cuffs and I have zero criminal record of any kind.
I am a law abiding citizen and not any where close to being a "dumb red neck", I wish they would respect my right to bear arms.
Yeah, he could have used another weapon...but for the sake of arguing, it is a lot less likely for someone in the heat of passion to use an "intimate" weapon, rather than a gun. I took a criminal homicide class back in college and spent half a semester on this subject....and for the life of me cannot remember if more homicides are pre-mediated or in the heat of passion. But if more are in the heat of passion, I can probably say that a gun would be the easiest and fastest way to achieve your goal if you were thinking irrationally.
Log in to comment