I'm curious as to whether any of the people in this thread advocating for more gun control have ever actually bought a firearm before.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm curious as to whether any of the people in this thread advocating for more gun control have ever actually bought a firearm before.
Obviously, and other people telling them how, and if they can and can't defend themselves because one nutcase got trigger happy is simply not right.[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="Socialist696"] I don't think those men are the men in question. Clearly..worlock77
And where have I done so?
It wasnt directed at you specifically, just the overall thread.I would suggest regulations on any weapon that can gun down a dozen people in seconds.redstorm72So any weapon designed since the 1880s, including your father's hunting rifles? This is why I'm harping on you, you're riddling your arguments with inconsistencies and double-standards.
I still don't understand why you have such a stick up your rear about my word usage when it really had nothing to do with what I was saying.redstorm72The same reason anyone with even a lick of medical knowledge has a stick up their rear about people who think vaccines don't do anything; you're spreading terms and even ideas that are just not solid, consistent, or even in the realm of reality, even if it is unintentional.
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]+1 If concealed to carry was allowed in that Colorado town, I'd bet that not as many people would've died. The only thing more guns would have caused during that fiasco would have been more casualties. The death toll was actually mercifully low, due to the shooter using birdshot in his shotgun and a jam-happy Beta C-mag (which no one with common sense would ever use outside of a firing range) in his AR-15 that gave out within seconds. A Glock being whipped out by a member of the audience would have just caused more misery, and even if hits were landed on the lunatic in the packed theater, he was wearing a considerable about of body armor that would have no issue stopping most CC-friendly rounds.no the best possible solution is to give everyone guns because then theyll just shoot at bad guys and stuff
what could go wrong?
Slayer_of_Bugs
[QUOTE="redstorm72"] I would suggest regulations on any weapon that can gun down a dozen people in seconds.Verge_6So any weapon designed since the 1880s, including your father's hunting rifles? This is why I'm harping on you, you're riddling your arguments with inconsistencies and double-standards.
I still don't understand why you have such a stick up your rear about my word usage when it really had nothing to do with what I was saying.redstorm72The same reason anyone with even a lick of medical knowledge has a stick up their rear about people who think vaccines don't do anything; you're spreading terms and even ideas that are just not solid, consistent, or even in the realm of reality, even if it is unintentional.
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
redstorm72
I see you're using the favorite terms of rabid anti-gun supporters. Terms only meant to scare people.
Tell me, what is your definition of a "high-powered" rifle?
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
airshocker
I see you're using the favorite terms of rabid anti-gun supporters. Terms only meant to scare people.
Tell me, what is your definition of a "high-powered" rifle?
Watch him say a Barrett obviously lol[QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
airshocker
I see you're using the favorite terms of rabid anti-gun supporters. Terms only meant to scare people.
Tell me, what is your definition of a "high-powered" rifle?
Berrett
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="redstorm72"] Why not be a little more creative? Say a Mosin Nagant or something :/
[QUOTE="airshocker"]
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
redstorm72
I see you're using the favorite terms of rabid anti-gun supporters. Terms only meant to scare people.
Tell me, what is your definition of a "high-powered" rifle?
Berrett
Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...redstorm72
So, yes, your guidelines for what firearms warrant regulation would include almost every weapon under the sun that still sees even moderate use.
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
redstorm72
What's wrong with just "semiautomatic rifles"? That's precisely what they are. And please, for all that is holy, don't use "high powered", it's as much a political term as "assault weapon". There is the "full powered" designation for rifles chambered in a cartridge that is above an intermediate type (like 5.56 and 7.62x39) that is much more appropriate and actually has a discernible area of coverage.
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]Yeah, because it is totally feasible to kill a dozen people in quick succesion with a bolt action rifle with a 5 round magazine...Verge_6
So, yes, your guidelines for what firearms warrant regulation would include almost every weapon under the sun that still sees even moderate use.
Also, what should I call "assualt weapons/rifles"? You keep saying it is the wrong term for semi automatic high powered rifles, but you haven't told me what the correct one is?
redstorm72
What's wrong with just "semiautomatic rifles"? That's precisely what they are. And please, for all that is holy, don't use "high powered", it's as much a political term as "assault weapon". There is the "full powered" designation for rifles chambered in a cartridge that is above an intermediate type (like 5.56 and 7.62x39) that is much more appropriate and actually has a discernible area of coverage.
I like the Garands too. Great rifles. You can also consider the fact that back in the day, Repeaters had large amounts of ammo so the age of mass killing potential for guns isn't anything new at all.Hey hey guys, I just realized something. Guns don't kill people. Bullets do :PSocialist696We should just make bullets illegal.
[QUOTE="Socialist696"]Hey hey guys, I just realized something. Guns don't kill people. Bullets do :PSlayer_of_BugsWe should just make bullets illegal. We should make bullets cost $5000 each.
I wonder what these pro-regulation people think of fast and furious and Obama calling executive privilege. Slayer_of_Bugs
I thought Fast and Furious was one of the weaker movies in the series, Fast 5 was much better.
[QUOTE="tenaka2"][QUOTE="Slayer_of_Bugs"]yeah if I was in that theater I would have preferred that someone or myself had a gun and was shooting back at him rather than sitting there helplessly.Slayer_of_Bugs
Wouldn't you be happier if he didn't have the guns in the first place?
Sure but I don't think that's realisticOnly because of people with your mind set.
[QUOTE="Slayer_of_Bugs"][QUOTE="Socialist696"]Hey hey guys, I just realized something. Guns don't kill people. Bullets do :PFightingfanWe should just make bullets illegal. We should make bullets cost $5000 each.
clicky
Sure but I don't think that's realistic[QUOTE="Slayer_of_Bugs"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]
Wouldn't you be happier if he didn't have the guns in the first place?
tenaka2
Only because of people with your mind set.
I believe its common sense. Humans are capable of kindness as equal to cruelty. As long as we're human there will always be room for a psychopath, or Tyrant who wishes to instill reign through sole power, or harm onto our fellow men and women. They will find a way regardlessPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment