Do you accept g@ys?

[QUOTE="Ownage_Delivery"]You're derailing this fruity thread...Dark_Knight6

Leik, omigod! I looooove fruit!

There, back on track. :D

not really a problem unless they start hitting on me....

Yeah I accept them but I hate the ones that stare at me and look like they want to uhm....do stuff...with me.... Yeah it happens and I hate it! Creeps me out!

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Ownage_Delivery"] I have the power.luamhtrad

Who do?

[QUOTE="Ownage_Delivery"][QUOTE="pokerstuds"]I will never accept gays .I voted yes on 8!!!!!!!!! LOVE JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!or diepokerstuds

I accept gays because they are just the same as you in every other way escept sexual orientation. Like with alot of things you dont have to get involved, but it is wrong to castigate them for it.

[QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]The power of VOODOO!jimmyjammer69

Who do?

Do what? (such a good movie though)

Also the way gays behave traumatizes children.

SongeeX

By the way, what's this fuss all about? The topic is " Do you accept g@ys?", so I expressed my opinion. If you are unsatisfied then why the hell did you create such topic? You had better called it "If you accept gays, tell us here".SongeeX

i don't judge people on there sexual preference.

joesh89

In my country, children in kindergardens will be told about gays and fairy tales will not consist of prince and princess, but prince and prince! That what I had in mind. SongeeX

Your fears are somewhat irrational.

Yeah, I know, but a few guys took my opinion to deep in their hearts and expressed their negative emotions on me. That's why I wrote it.

SongeeX

Thats why some people got offended or disturbed by your posts.

And besides the point is not to introduce homosexuality in folklore or arts as a form of propaganda (especially when it comes to children), but to teach acceptance.

So yes when a child of any age asks its parents or teacher(s) the answer that should be given is one that promotes the (right) idea that homosexual people are equal to heterosexuals, that they are not to be discriminated and above all, not all of those things because it is imposed to the rest, but because it is the homosexual people's right (and everyone's right for that matter) to enjoy a life of equal freedom with the rest.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="SongeeX"]

In my country, children in kindergardens will be told about gays and fairy tales will not consist of prince and princess, but prince and prince! That what I had in mind. SongeeX

Your fears are somewhat irrational.

I read it in a newspaper and not in a scandal sheet. I don't know whether this will happen or not.

It would be good if children got it this way. But they can also think, that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality and they can date any sex, because it is normal. And this would lead into a tragedy. That is what am I afraid of.SongeeX

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

And besides the point is not to introduce homosexuality in folklore or arts as a form of propaganda (especially when it comes to children), but to teach acceptance.

So yes when a child of any age asks its parents or teacher(s) the answer that should be given is one that promotes the (right) idea that homosexual people are equal to heterosexuals, that they are not to be discriminated and above all, not all of those things because it is imposed to the rest, but because it is the homosexual people's right (and everyone's right for that matter) to enjoy a life of equal freedom with the rest.

SongeeX

Simply put, your kid will not become homosexual because he/she sees that it is an accepted phenomenon. As far as everyone knows, most homosexual people grew up in a society that was/is discriminating against homosexuals which clearly shows that actually BEING a homosexual has nothing to do with the society you are living in and what you see as acceptable. It only has to do with the own person's acceptance of what he/she ALREADY is and then the decision to act upon it which is the right way.

Of course I accept gays.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="SongeeX"]

I read it in a newspaper and not in a scandal sheet. I don't know whether this will happen or not.

SongeeX

I didnt read the whole thing, but the impression it gave me is that they are still studying on it and seeing whether it is appropriate/effective (meaning it teaches acceptance and its not a propaganda).

Now as far as I can tell there are many ways in which you can do certain things. Yes such an innovation, if carried out in a specific way it may work as a propaganda. This one though does not seem to be an effort of propaganda. In the right way and context and with the help of scientists (psychiatrists and others scientists on the field) the effort can be done in the right way.

I will read it all maybe later and I will tell you what I think.

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

2. Then, using condoms deviates from the "natural" destination of human kind and therefore should be condemned, am I right?

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

2) Again, not a valid reason. There are sterile straight men and women that you wouldn't call unnatural.

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

[QUOTE="K_56"]

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

AirGuitarist87

Get that plane down NOW!!! :x

[QUOTE="K_56"]

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

Funky_Llama

Two reasons why being gay is not "normal" or natural".

1. If it was "normal" there would be religions that supported it. I personally don't count Atheism because they dont believe in anything.

2. If it was "natural" they would be able to reproduce.

And before anybody says that Christianity supports gays rights, it does not. Christianity simply does not judgepeople because of thier sins.

K_56

It's kinda reversed; on a legal scale Christianity does not support (how can an ideology support something anyway?) or prohibit rights of any kind except ones given by God (life, worship, etc.).

There are some judgements of sins, though.

I have no close personal gay friends (that I know of), but I have absolutely no problem with gay people, and why should I? People like who they like, love who they love, it's not for me to question it, and I don't think anyone should.

Good, it's great to see that people are much more accepting than I thought they would be.

i have no problem with gay people.:)

but i hate when other people talk bad about them.

Teh gays love me, so i love teh gays back.........eww no not in that way