mfacek's forum posts

Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

[QUOTE="mfacek"]Your argument wasn't about what a "majority" is but whether you group whites as one group and non-whites as another. If you look at it by specific race, then yes, whites are the majority. If you look at is as whites as opposed to non-whites as you obviously do, it's not a majority. There's no use in arguing semantics.Famiking
You need to represent over 50% to be a majority. If Christianity is the most popular religion in the country, but only 48% of the country call themselves Christians, they are a minority. A political part that wins with less than 50% vote is said to win with minority vote.

Hmm...I had to go back and re-check my English and I suppose you're right.

A group holding the most members but not over half would be a "plurality".

EDIT:

Went back AGAIN and have found that a group holding the most members but not being over half CAN in fact be called a majority.

Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

Making friends happens naturally. You dont just go up to people and ask them.

roosuu
Sure you don't just go up and "ask them"...but if you don't attempt to make new friends it will never happen "naturally".
Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

Some people don't understand what a "majority" is.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=majority&db=luna

I got into a flame war about this in another topic awhile ago. In the topic, a user made the statement that Off-Topic is mostly made up of white people. I mentioned that I recently made a poll titled "What is your race?". At the time, whites were around 44% of the respondents of the poll while blacks, Asians, people of mixed-race, and other groups combined were the majority at 56% of the respondents. At the time, there were 34 respondents; of which 15 reported "white" as their race. Half of 30 is 15 but 15 is less than half of 34. 17 is half of 34. According to the definition of "majority" in the link, it means over half; meaning over 50%. The user kept arguing that whites were the majority at 44%. The percentage "44%" is not a majority. In addition, another user mentioned that 34 people isn't well enough to represent everyone in Off-Topic. I'm well aware of that. But then again, how could the other user prove Off-Topic is mostly made up of whites? And then near the end he said that I failed on many levels. I tried to apologize to him. He said it was too late. I said "good riddance". What a worthless waste of time. A majority means over half or over 50%. Apparently, that user will never understand what a majority is.

Also, if you feel like flaming me, don't post in this topic. I'm not going to waste my time like I did in the other topic.

I'm just telling everyone the definition of the word "majority" along with a little story with it.

gamerguru100
Your argument wasn't about what a "majority" is but whether you group whites as one group and non-whites as another. If you look at it by specific race, then yes, whites are the majority. If you look at is as whites as opposed to non-whites as you obviously do, it's not a majority. There's no use in arguing semantics.
Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#4 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

It's much easier to meet friends if your with a friend yourself.

Though I've never met anyone at a pool...I would recommend crashing a party if your adament on meeting new people. The atmosphere at parties makes it impossible not to meet someone.

Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

[QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Civil War...it was actually about the US.;)

LJS9502_basic

While World War 2 may not have "been about" the US, an Axis victory would certainly profoundly change America. I'm still on the fence.

If the Civil War hadn't solidified American than that would not have mattered.

This is a pointless argument. You or I have no idea what America would be like if either of these wars were lost and therefore it's impossible to say which is more "important", which brings me to my original point.

Superlatives aren't always necessary. I think we can get away with calling them both extremely important.

Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

List A. List B is ruined by T-Pain and Flo Rida.

smtfs2113
Agreed.
Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

List A although Kanye West, Nas, and Dr. Dre are amazing in their own right.

Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts
[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Salads I have already said are often times are just as bad if not worse to those places.. Where there have been studies where a salad can easily exceed 1000 calories there.. When you are in that state of morbid obesity, peopel who actually come back from that.. Are put on a STRICT diet of foods that are cooked themselves.. And put on a excising regime.. When I see a person this wieght at a fast food resturante on a scooter incapable of even walking in.. I see some one who clearly is not doing that.sSubZerOo

If we are making assumption how do we even know she is ordering for herself. Honestly I don't see a bag or her talk over the voicebox.

I did consider this, either way she came in on a scooter and couldn't even walk in to get her food.. She clearly does not care for her self image..

Why does it bother you so much?
Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

They are all important, even the ones no one talks about.

Don't shame the soldiers in the little wars just because they don't get media buzz, like the US-Filipine war in about 1905.

Oh wait, there was a US military conflict in the Filipines in about 1905? Yeah, sad you never hear about it.

avatar_genius
Oh, the war where the Filipinos rose up to fight for independence against an imperialist power...reminds me of another war. There's nothing wrong with "shaming" a war. I certainly think America's imperialist policies during the turn of the century were very shameful. However, no one is "shaming" any soldiers. Saying a war was wrong does not detract from the people who headed the call to fight for their country, on either side.
Avatar image for mfacek
mfacek

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 mfacek
Member since 2006 • 3000 Posts

[QUOTE="mfacek"]

I think that both World War 2 and the Civil War profoundly changed America. I can't really distinguish which is more "important".

LJS9502_basic

Civil War...it was actually about the US.;)

While World War 2 may not have "been about" the US, an Axis victory would certainly profoundly change America. I'm still on the fence.