Console shooters tend to be generic, hand holding, two weapon limit, no where near as good as PC fps. Crysis went downhill when it went to consoles, so did alot of shooters that started on PC then consoles curropted them.
locopatho
Far Cry? Metro? Portal? Bioshock? All console multiplats. Blame the devs, not the consoles. You can do whatever you want in terms of design. If devs ape COD, it's their fault, not consoles.Finally someone understands. We need new developers with fresh brains, because the current ones can't think straight.
Hermits are so desperate that they're trying to find everything about GTA V PC version coming earlier. We all know it's coming to the PC in about 6-5 months.
[QUOTE="McStrongfast"][QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]Neither. They both are casual games where multiplayer is basically shooty shooty pay n spray gaining XP and single player is basically 3 hour cinematic QTE fest. last good COD was COD1/uo and BF was BF2.. Better FPS release this year that is Metro. BF2 is probably the sprayiest Battlefield and essentially responsible for starting this tedious grindmill trend. It had better singleplayer than BF3 though.CoD is the one who started this nonsense. Not BF2, it didn't sell as much as CoD MW2. MW2 is the reason we see crappy FPS games today.
Log in to comment