joke_man's comments

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@id0ntkn0w7: Are you saying that the point of toned male characters in video games is to be objectified by players in a sexual way?

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sony1979: These comments seem to paint a very different picture of who cares...lol

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@decadentdescent: Your feedback is duly noted and now near immediately disregarded. Cheers

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@James_xeno:

You're talker. Listening to talkers makes me thirsty. And hungry.

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@suppaphly42:

If your point is that the 2nd review was duplicative and stupid, then we agree.

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jonnybrownieboy:

"Well first of all im not sure what you mean by archetypes maybe you meant architecture?"

Feel free to google it and learn about common JRPG archetypes if you're unfamiliar.

"Second the tales series was never established on its graphics. Its established on its storytelling."

(1) I don't see how that's relevant. (2) The storytelling has hardly changed and involves the same JRPG character types in most of the games--which is my point concerning archetypes.

"Third, different genres in the same situation, not sure what you mean by reviews (thats stating the obvious of course theyre different reviews)"

The point is making such an analogy is apples and oranges.

"and third, fair enough ill give you the fact that reviewers does influence the score."

On that, then, we can agree ;)

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide:

On this, my friend, we agree

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide:

At most I'd agree with you that KVO is a better reviewer (I was fond of him too). So, we'll have to settle to agree to disagree on that ;)

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@suppaphly42:

They were different reviewers...This by no means proves anything.

Avatar image for joke_man
joke_man

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide:

"I call bullspit on that dude. There's just no way that's even possible unless you ran through each mission with the chicken hat aka cheating."

I don't personally care what your opinion is on something I've done for which you have no clue.

"If gaming websites based the content of their reviews on what they think people will or will not play then all reviews would be shorter and have even less content then they do now. You don't watch one hour of fellowship of the ring and then review the movie."

(1) Apples and oranges.

(2) Conveniently ignores what I said.

"These Bethesda games are ginormous and I feel a more generous amount of time should be spent with these games in particular in order to more properly relate what the REAL average gamers time with the game will be like."

And as I said, most people don't put that much time on average into a game, and you have no basis upon which to suggest 40 hours is insufficient as to this game.

"Zero. I don't own the game."

Great. Thank you for proving your opinion is uninformed on the subject.