Elder Scrolls versus some half-assed console crap? That's not even a contest.

Thing is, there's nothing at all surprising here except possibly SteamMMO. Of course Half-life 3 is in some stage of development. No surprise they'd be kicking around a new Left 4 Dead, considering the popularity and success of the first two games. And the Source engine is nearly ten years old, naturally they're working on a successor.

Please post a billing address so I can invoice you for the five minutes of my life you just wasted (I stopped it a bit more than halfway through, thankfully) watching this.

This is a joke of some sort? I'm not entirely sure I get it. To explain things since the GameSpot staff don't quite seem to get it - you cannot have a good shooter on a console. It is actually impossible to do so. So calling a console game "Shooter of the Year" is absolutely ludicrous.

Wow, what a miserable choice. Seriously? Guild Wars 2 is pretty to look at, but it's neither engaging now does it bring anything new to the table. While the ending of Mass Effect 3 may have been a let down, the game was absolutely solid and was far and away a better choice than another carbon copy MMO.

Yawn. So what about the promised new single-player update?

"To the contrary, it will be the clicking of mice" That's really all they needed to say to scare me away. I like a little more depth to my gaming than incessant clicking.