Well the interested things they shown at there e3 press conference like the last of us,god of war 4 and beyond are all coming out next year so i not sure what exclusives are planned this year,not alot,but alot of good multi-platform games so its good for everyone
I finished Luigi's mansion on the gamecube (actually played it on my wii but y'know) and im not ashamed to say some parts of it did spook me out,not in a terrified way but going around a haunted mansion even in the kinda cartoony themed luigi's mansion still made me jump in a few spots when those ghost would pop up behind me :P
[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"][QUOTE="blacktorn"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] We will see won't we. It hasn't showed it so far. And the fact the 360 and PS3 are 7 years old I find it pathetic that Nintendo is gonna charge $300 for something that is only as good as the 360. Fact is the Wii U should blow the 360 out of the water. Instead it just blows. Nintendo didn't win the last generation in both home console and portable game sales because of there chips it was the innovative controls that won them this generation,nintendo didn't even mention anything about the hardware powering the wii u because it's all about what the new controller can do for games,in any case it will still have great first party games that will be worth buying the wii u at some point anyway,who can call themselves an honest hardcore gamer if they don't play zelda or mario games,they are amoung the best and only found on nintendo's platforms. They won over the mass audience with family oriented marketing, cheap hardware, kid friendly first party games and gimmicks. They didn't win because of Zelda or Mario... sales figures alone prove that. I didn't say they won because of mario or zelda i said because of innovative controls which you called gimmicks,maybe it was a gimmick,in any case it won them this generation so it was a gimmick worth investing in.Of course some actually liked the wii controller for what it was and would not consider it a gimmick,each to there own
I was skeptical that a generational leap would be realistic, considering diminishing returns, but this has made me think again. It looks "next gen."
Haha well maybe it was the youtube feed that i watched of it wasn't good quality but it didn't wow me for some reason,but after playing ff xiii the final fantasy brand has been dead for awhile, i'm not sure we are going to get a great final fantasy again that can live upto it's name,infact jrpg's as a whole have died as a genre this generation,shame really.
[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="blacktorn"]I don't agree at all with what he said,i mean the xbox launch 1 year earlier and was $100 than the base model ps3 yet the games for a good 2-3 years looked and just ran better on the 360,so yeah the ps3 came out later and was more powerful but that difference we are only seeing now,so how can someone justify saying yeah it was right for me to pay more for the ps3 6 years ago because now there are aload of great exclusive ps3 games that do look better than 360 games (although not a world of difference). If sony can release the ps4 for example again a year later than microsoft's next xbox due to launch next holiday season BUT it actually has a noticeable improvement over what microsoft's console does and is evident from the launch of the system then yeah it will be worth waiting an extra year so sony can have the better system. But if they are going to have a more complicated system that is more powerful but we won't notice that until many years down the road then i don't think it's worth making that same mistake twice,however if sony don't do that then what will distinguish them from microsoft? Agreed. You buy the ps3 at the end of the cycle when the games actually get to use 'da powa' of the console and not buy it at the star. Instead get a 360 at the start for cheaper than a ps3 with games that performed and looked better. Same will happen next generation, I suspect the two consoles will be very close in power, and i'll get whichever has the better game lineup/quality looking games at the start. Yeah and at the end of the day anyone who really takes gaming as one of his main hobbies is going to purchase all consoles down the line,i mean i have never bought a ps3 for example but have owned 3 xbox 360's since 2006 and the ps3 was more expensive at the time and the game lineup of the xbox was better,but now i think the tables have turned and the ps3 has much more interesting exclusives that make me want to buy that system,also the price of the ps3 isn't that much more than a 360 now so price is no longer a issue also.
[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"][QUOTE="blacktorn"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] I never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference. In any case despite you posting a game that you think looks better it doesn't changed the fact that the wii u is more powerful than the 360 and ps3 as many devs have already said,so no point in arguing against some screenshots of different games,the wii u is more powerful. We will see won't we. It hasn't showed it so far. And the fact the 360 and PS3 are 7 years old I find it pathetic that Nintendo is gonna charge $300 for something that is only as good as the 360. Fact is the Wii U should blow the 360 out of the water. Instead it just blows. Nintendo didn't win the last generation in both home console and portable game sales because of there chips it was the innovative controls that won them this generation,nintendo didn't even mention anything about the hardware powering the wii u because it's all about what the new controller can do for games,in any case it will still have great first party games that will be worth buying the wii u at some point anyway,who can call themselves an honest hardcore gamer if they don't play zelda or mario games,they are amoung the best and only found on nintendo's platforms.
[QUOTE="umcommon"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] You expect him too after you make such an ignorant statement? You think Pikmin 3 looks better than Max Payne 3 and Gears 3? You are **** stupid. There is nothing else to really say. This is perhaps the biggest fanboy war cry I have ever seen in this forum. Dumb dumb dumb dumb. Go watch todays invisible walls. They will explain to you just how worthless Nintendo's press conference was.......WarTornRuston
The shading, lighting, geometry, and polygon count look better genius. Oh I forgot... you'd only like Pikmin if it was violent, how silly of me. I never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference. In any case despite you posting a game that you think looks better it doesn't changed the fact that the wii u is more powerful than the 360 and ps3 as many devs have already said,so no point in arguing against some screenshots of different games,the wii u is more powerful.
Log in to comment