I don't understand the score of 6. There are many games that have released sequels with little improvements. Yet they still get 8+ scores. A Batman game that has little changes from AC doesn't sound like a 6. Why does this get 6 as opposed to other sequels that have little changes?
Although I love AC, I'm really skeptical of this one from another developer and would like to know exactly what makes this game inferior to AC as an individual title, and not as an expectation as a sequel.
I remember the first time I created my web site ID. I wanted to use 91x, but it was taken so I added my initial to the front. Never saw what kind of joke that would lead to... Sigh.
It's easier for children to game on mobile devices than on devices connected to TV's or monitors. It's because it's easier to avoid their parents' watch and avoid nag. Mobile games are also more casual friendly for non-dedicated gamers.
People thought Apple would finally release a phone with a more reasonable price tag. Unfortunately, the iPhone 5C is not budget priced. iPhone 5S is just another minor upgrade... from the already disappointing iPhone 5. iOS 7 looks too childish and a lot of people seem to absolutely hate it. iPad 5 and iPad mini (with better ppi) seem to have interesting changes according to rumors, but were MIA.
The reason I bisically no longer buy Capcom games, is because I don't like paying for a game only to find out they locked/pulled stuff out so I have to pay more in order to get the full game. It's really sickening. Not only that. Even if the game has legitimate DLC, I often get discouraged from buying a game if it's loaded with overpriced DLC. I don't spend my money on games that try to milk me. I spend my money on games that deserve it.
bj91x's comments