I know right? I agree with xcollector-- this all sounded bogus from the very start. Come one there are definitely fps's out there that prove you can build a bigger, better looking fps than any COD game ever has been and still make it run at least 60 frames per second-- just take a look at Crysis 2 and of course...BATTLEFIELD 3, which both run on the Xbox 360 and PS3-- not to mention the PS3 also has KZ2 & 3 which also graphically beat down the COD series.I must say, with how mediocre the series actually is (compared to what it should be considering it's like the highest selling fps franchise in the world) I keep buying and playing the crap out of the new installments. Recently of course, it's been COD MW3, which I got the first week, and have reached prestige 10 (11-15 are a ripoff because the emblems look stupid and all the same practically, no creativity). That being what it is...I would love to see them actually take some time to add something new to the game and upgrade it to at least keep up with what other games are doing, if not to out-do them as well. They seriously need to tweak their games so it's not so easy to cheat....I mean really? If it's so impossible to stop, then why are problems like that not so rampant on other games? Not so say that they don't exist, but I have never played a game with more pansy dork swallowing cheaters on it than any online COD game.

hahaha I love HavQ-san's comment. Soso true.

@zipnut5-- LMAO. I usually tell people not to quit their day jobs, but you can probably afford to man that's hilarious.

lol, I feel ya, same here.

Well that's fine nd4, and I knew what you meant the first time I read it, but it's good to know that you do in fact know how to spell and punctuate correctly, and that you cared to show us. Lol, this conversation is becoming pretty amusing. Look, honestly, I don't really care that much, if you think you're right then fine you are. I'm sorry for calling you a moron when I disagreed with you, although I still disagree. lol

malghani said it! Praise be to the wisdom of malghani! lol

Then how is that observation pertinent anyways in the first place? TAA would be the thing to look at since you view games in motion.... Sorry I assumed you were referring to what matters.....

@nd4spdr-- what you claim to notice is subjective. Besides, nobody said anything about an 8x anyways, as I believe I remember, it was half of that (4x) lol. Nice quote there buddy lmao

@ Juk3n-- Lol I can see your point, I was mainly directing that at people who angrily picket for Microsoft or Sony based on their fandom of a particular system. Obviously your point about us all being somewhat of a "dork" in our own right is true, otherwise you are right, I wouldn't be reading and commenting on this article. Don't freak I wasn't talking s*** to everybody, just the fanatics. They can take all the offense they want :) and I hope you're not one!

@ nd4spdr-- anti-aliasing is most apparent in motion moron. And if you haven't noticed the images are always clearer on the internet (gamespot and other game sites) than they are on the screen when you are playing, and I mean on a 1080p screen with settings up. Still always look sharper as stills on a website, so it would be even more difficult to tell if there was anti-aliasing or not! I hate when people talk out their A......