lol, this is funny. the main point is that the PS3 was supposed to be a LOT better than the 360 originally, hence the delayed release, and the highly touted spec sheet. Big whup though, 360 has better graphics on almost all of the games that are ported to both systems, and of course it has amazing graphics on its exclusives. The PS3 also has excellent graphics, and some of its exclusive games are beautiful, but nothing to make it stand apart from the 360. All you playstation fanboys got lied to, and now you're in denial as you continue to claim superiority. It's all about the games anyways, and your personal preference in games should make the difference in which console you purchase. I'm with the 360 there, although there are some good PS3 games I obviously miss out on, and vice versa for PS3 owners. The fact that people will sit here and argue tooth and nail about it is pathetic, because what it all comes down to is that we are all sheepish consumers that got suckered by companies into buying video games, because they figured out what we like and how to make us buy it. Ya'll are worse than Nintendo fanboys, and that's pretty damn nerdy. Say hello to Handgella and Palmela for me, dorks.

half the script on this page doesn't work. I'll be surprised if this actually posts. Tsk tsk mister web master, do your job.