Vangaurdius' forum posts
[QUOTE="Vangaurdius"]consoles are [for]people who can't afford a good computer (although really, it's more a case of being too lazy to put a good computer together...)El_Zo1212oO shut up. Believe or not, there are people who don't know **** about PC hardware. That means we either buy a prebuilt setup(several times more expensive than building your own) or we pay someone to build us a machine(just as expensive as buying a prebuilt machine). And also, some of us prefer the convenience of playing on consoles to the potential hassle of having to troubleshoot a new PC title. Which falls into the too lazy to learn or do it despite being fully aware of the superiority.
There is always room for improvement but do we absolutely need it to enjoy the game proven by the past? No. You don't need realistic people to enjoy a game to its fullest. Yes realistic graphics would be nice. But no graphics that aren't realistic should not be left. As for poor people, that is how the market works. Poor people don't buy so they're not going to sell it. In the end people can still enjoy artistic graphics and realistic graphics are not mandatory for the game industry to move on.[QUOTE="Vangaurdius"]No, there is plenty of room for improvement. And games are far from photo-realistic unless your blind. You can have both amazing graphics and great gameplay. Where the problem lays is in terribly outdated consoles and halting progress because the poor cannot afford to keep pace with the technology. True progress will come when they are left behind.shadowchronicle
Also you sound kind of pompous when you talk about how poor people should be left behind.
Should have been more clear in regards to graphics. I don't mean everything needs to try and be ARMA. I'm referring more to textures that aren't blurry, dynamic shadows that are effected by every light source in a room etc. I'd be pretty bored if everything tried to be a real life simulator. Gaming needs crazy stuff like Serious Sam and cartoony graphics can look really good if they put a lot of effort into it. As for the whole poor thing. That's why the next xbox is only using a lousy 6670. The main market for consoles are people who can't afford a good computer (although really, it's more a case of being too lazy to put a good computer together, as they really aren't all that expensive, especially considering cards like the gtx 690 are complete overkill, same thing with processors). The consoles need to be dirt cheap because of their market. What needs to happen is a separation between consoles and PC's. Developers and Publishers that make games exclusively for PC's should get together with nvida, amd, etc. and start pushing games requirements and use that to push the sale of new computer parts. They already sort of do this with things like physX, but they should push even harder. I wouldn't mind the advertising if it meant I got to play games that look better, and have more sophisticated mechanics.You are forgetting that they're French. Still, the image was more of poking fun at what could happen, rather than what is happening.Calling the Colonists "good guys" is laughable at best lmfao. @ Vanguardius, if Ubisoft were an American company, I'd bet my life and house on the game being like that. Just be thankful that they're European.
Englandfc1966
Log in to comment