hey laihendi

have you ever read John Rawls?

[QUOTE="Ncsoftlover"]

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

Yeah, depends on the situation, only internet kids don't support it. They get all their morals from the liberal circle jerk on the internet.

GD1551

try to get a restore death penalty bill in Canadian parliament where there's a conservative majority and see how the vote will go, then you'll know if it's just the kids on the internet that are against it.

Nobody gives a shit about irrelevant countries like Canada.

On that note, I wouldn't want to be shorter than I am now.Suzy_Q_Kazoo

Well, obviously it should theoretically increase unemployment, but that doesn't necessarily seem to actually happen.coolbeans90

I'd imagine that's based on what market model (competitive v dynamic monopsony) you use to theorize about the labour market

caveat to myself: generally a minimum wage above a certain threshold should be expected to increase unemployment in both models 

I don't understand "wealth equality". If you put in less why should you get more? Fightingfan

you'd think anyone affiliated with the GOP would have the sense not to speak about controversial issues that damaged the organization just months earlier

like seriously do these people have a political anti-survival instinct

yeah but I am asking you for some explanation as to why they were incapable of conceptualizing property

they might have been fully capable but just found their communal belief system was more valuable to them

or is it that they just did not accept the rule of private property? I am confused by your argument

do you not think it was possible to educate the natives the concept of rights instead of just declaring them incapable

because that just seems like an absurdly huge assumption. They might've been living in ways contrary to private property regimes, but that doesn't mean they were incapable of conceiving of private property or rights to it

how come it is always people who cling onto ideas of extremely strong individualism that end up somehow justifying the worst affronts against individuals

That is correct. If you have no conception of property ownership then you are not a civilized person and you do not deserve to be treated as one.Laihendi

Liberalism is a joke you see, most of the things they say are only true on paper, but in reality are completely and absolutely FALSE!   Communism anyone? I doubt a conservative constructed that idea, of course now we know it is proven false, but deep down liberals would love communism to work. There is just one problem, not all individuals are trustworthy and are altruistic. That is the big flaw right there.mahlasor