[QUOTE="OmniXIISlash"]

I had an interview at a pizza hut a few weeks ago. When they ask why did you want this job don't say money. I said money and they seemed angry and then started talking about how they were looking for someone with more Pizza Hut Spirit or some garbage. Luckily it was only like a 2 minute interview before they asked that and clearly didn't like my answer unlike the hour long one at sears

JasonDarksavior

Of course everyone does it for money, but don't say that.

Say you like engaging with people, be upbeat, put some bounce in your step, and make sure to tuck in your shirt.ZumaJones07

I think the most important thing is to say that you love pizza hut and that's why you wanted to work there.

It's going to be an American Civil War with me on one side trying to kill everyone for the lulz and everyone else trying to stop me... To make a long story short I'm going to win then move on to destroying the world with all the nuclear weapons I'll have from killing everyone else in america.

I had an interview at a pizza hut a few weeks ago. When they ask why did you want this job don't say money. I said money and they seemed angry and then started talking about how they were looking for someone with more Pizza Hut Spirit or some garbage. Luckily it was only like a 2 minute interview before they asked that and clearly didn't like my answer unlike the hour long one at sears

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]

[QUOTE="superfluidity"]

I get that prison is punishment, but why should porn specifically be forbidden?

It basically amounts to someone's interpretation of morality being imposed on inmates, rather than just banning something for practical reasons (like weapons). It actually seems like it would make a lot of sense to allow it, because it would probably reduce the prison rape problem.

James161324

You don't reward a naughty child with lollies. You send them to their room.

Exactly, prision shouldn't be nice, i like the dudgeon's of medieval time

Then give them only nude pictures of Paris Hilton?

[QUOTE="OmniXIISlash"]

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]

I hope this is one of those times where a judge uses common sense and tells the guy to stop wasting peoples time and tells him that if he wanted access to porn maybe he shouldn't have robbed a bank and instead gottebn a job, bought a computer and internet connection and had access to all the porn he wanted...

If it's one of those cases where lawyers try to exploit some insignificant and semantic loophole in the law and the judge actually falls for it then the entire United States should just implode. The law should be there to protect people, not allow convicted criminals to make asinine cases in an attempt to exploit legal loopholes especialyl when common sense fills in that hole.

DigitalExile

If the loophole is there the judge can't fall for it. The Judge has to allow the loophole exploit until it's ended with a new law. Judges don't make the laws they can only sentance people for breaking them and if something falls into a loophole then the judge has to allow it.

I don't know where you read that you forfeit your luxury to porn when you commit a crime. I can kinda understand where the guy is coming from because sexual stimulation is needed and wanted by the very fabric of the human rage. To take that away might be pushing past the line of luxury and into the line of need which would be cruel and unusual punishment.

I hope this is one of those times where a judge uses common sense and tells the guy to stop wasting peoples time and tells him that if he wanted access to porn maybe he shouldn't have robbed a bank and instead gottebn a job, bought a computer and internet connection and had access to all the porn he wanted...

If it's one of those cases where lawyers try to exploit some insignificant and semantic loophole in the law and the judge actually falls for it then the entire United States should just implode. The law should be there to protect people, not allow convicted criminals to make asinine cases in an attempt to exploit legal loopholes especialyl when common sense fills in that hole.

DigitalExile

If the loophole is there the judge can't fall for it. The Judge has to allow the loophole exploit until it's ended with a new law. Judges don't make the laws they can only sentance people for breaking them and if something falls into a loophole then the judge has to allow it.

I'm sure there is a lot of copyright violations on the internet, but really what is anyone going to do?

That is crazy. I can understand at most a small fine for someone putting it up, but jail for watching it? really USA? I don't want to live on this planet anymore.