was this second take review done to make the other review seem better?, I know personal opinion is part of reviewing a game, but this easily could pass as an user review, or anyone talking about what they think of the game without analizing much of what they are saying, what happened to the pro reviews of a couple of years ago?
"BioShock Infinite. It's such a great mindf*ck, It's also beautiful, and I think, obviously, Levine always has such beautiful cross-cultural references, like Comstock and the Civil War and all that. I have to explain them to my daughter--I don't explain Comstock, that's a little heavy. I did explain, you know, he's a puritan guy, blah, blah, blah. I love the richness of those worlds. He's one of the best world creators in any of the visual forms, period."
haha great video. but I think feedbackula may not necessarily contribute to the downgrade of the comment section, I think it exposes people's stupidity and pettiness about unimportant things overall.
"Some other people talk about the limitations of the [current] hardware. We don't feel there are that many limitations. We feel we can do some very impressive stuff and do it for a large audience. This felt like the way... There'll be a much larger audience on PS3 than there will be on PS4. At a creative level, which is the most important for us, we could say everything we wanted to say and do everything we wanted to do on these machines. We didn't sit there saying, "We'd like to do this in the game, but we can't." There's plenty of power in these machines." -Dan Houser
Lunatic420s' comments