1. You can, but not with any credibility to a reasonable individual.

2. This is like if were were discussing the morality of a "social democracy" and I used Joseph Stalin to make a retarded point. The first tell that you're going to start introducing pseudo logic like false equivalencies and continuum fallacies is that you start dividing my position into numbered "points". It's laughably cartoonish.

Edit: So you edited your point to at least try to provide an honest argument. The argument is not in regards to the morality of "ethno-nationalism", it's whether or not white people and black people should be held to the same moral standard in this regard because of historical context.

1. Why can't who do what?

2. Irrelevant deflection. Try again.

I never said I had a problem with the movie for being black nationalist wish fulfillment. I'm pointing to the fact that one can't be of sound reasoning to hold progressive views and view The Black Panther's wish fulfillment as anything but problematic and maintain that you're opposed to ethno-nationalism.

If it's not a progressive value to oppose ethno-nationalism as a concept then all the the rhetoric and gas lighting when calling someone or their views "white nationalist" might as well go right out the window.

What is wrong with wanting to preserve your racial and cultural identity? Nothing, inherently.

Sorry dude, gibberish again. The point you're trying to make is in left field and not relevant at all.

No he's just being a typical pretzel-brained liberal trying to conflate a subjective view of culture with an objective welfare statistic that isn't in his favor. His arguments are always incredibly petty and are typically continuum fallacies revolving around semantics rather than substance.

that takes 5 seconds to debunk

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/02/19/homicides-toll-big-u-s-cities-2017/302763002/

https://www.thetrace.org/2017/07/gun-homicide-rates-baltimore-st-lous-detroit/

I thought your head was going to explode earlier because you couldn't respond to my question. I'm glad you recovered. When someone insists on this shitty meme where working class are the problem with guns then I respond with a shitty meme of my own.

If you think working class Americans are the "gun culture" problem, then move to Chicago or Detroit.

I reverted my post back to the form that you originally quoted, not because I don't stand by my previous assertion. It's not that I don't think gun laws aren't effective, I just think that folks are proposing legislative measures on the pretense that the "mass shooter" is the primary issue with guns. That's only a secondary issue. If they're proposing that background checks and an assault weapon ban is going to be an effective measure in reducing the instance of homicide in Chicago then I think they're wrong.

It's also this insistence that "gun culture" and the 2nd ammendment supporting working-class are the problem with violent crime in the US that I find particularly absurd. If that's someone's meme-worthy approach to legislate then they're obviously fundamentally retarded. Unfortunately that's what politicians are.

Yeah I figured. And yes, Islamic terrorism is the low-IQ talking point of the right used to justify legislation. It's not a tactic specific to one side. The notion that the 2nd Amendment supporting American working class redneck is ruining modern western society? Good luck providing for that. Obviously they didn't engage.