@loganx77: what? The federal government choose not to kill the ranchers. It's amazing how dumb the shit you post is.
It's amazing how child-like your understanding of reality is. If the ranchers were unarmed they could have simply apprehended and displaced them from their property with little to no collateral damage and media attention. Since they were armed, displacing them would require engaging and disabling them by lethal means. This would draw attention to the issue and is simply not worth the optics when other options are available.
In this case, with guns they win. Without guns, they probably lose. I'm not sure what you're not understanding.
Log in to comment